Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: part c states miscellaneous laws repealing act 1951 schedule i repeals Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 58 results (0.137 seconds)

Aug 20 1959 (HC)

Munnilal Kailash Chandra and ors. Vs. Akabai D/O. Malharrao and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP130

..... the territories enumerated therein including the territories of the 'corresponding state' of madhya pradesh (except certain districts) and the territories of the 'existing state' of madhya bharat except sunel.7. part v deals with 'high courts.'8. part xi is about 'legal and miscellaneous provisions.' in this part section 119 reads thus:'the provisions of part ii shall not be deemed to have effected any change in ..... be doubted that rules made by a high court under section 122 of the civil p. c. are covered by the definition of the word 'law' in section 2 of the act. section 122 of the civil procedure code runs thus:'high courts for part a states and part b states may, from time to time after previous publication, make rules regulating their own procedure and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2001 (HC)

State of M.P. and Others Vs. Balveer Singh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2001MP268; 2001(3)MPHT255; 2001(2)MPLJ644

..... of bhanpura tehsil of mandsaur district; (c) sironj sub-division of kotah district in the existing state of rajasthan; (d) the territories of the existing state of bhopal; and (e) the territories of the existing state of vindhya pradesh; (2) the said sironj sub-djvisipn shall be included in, and become part of, bhilsa district in the new state of madhya pradesh.7. the law relating ..... ix land records 111. jurisdiction of civil courts.-- the civil courts shall have jurisdiction to decide any dispute to which the state government is not a party relating to any right which is recorded in the record-of-rights.chapter xix miscellaneous 257. exclusive jurisdiction of revenue authorities.-- except as otherwise provided in this code, or in any other enactment for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 1960 (HC)

Guru Narayanprasad and ors. Vs. Pt. Kedarnath Vishweshwarprasadji

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1961MP216

..... of the transfer of property act and the two provisions cannot stand together. they are clearly repugnant to each other. if section 22 of the government of part c states act, 1951 applies, the state law must be declared void.11. however we are of the opinion that after the amendment of the definition of law made by parliament as given in ..... the presence or absence of such a power but whether the enactment is void on account of repugnancy in accordance with the provisions in section 22 of the government of part c states act, 1951.9. shri sen also relied upon the decision, in megh raj v. allah rakhia, air 1947 pc 72. the position under section 107 of the ..... provisions in section 6 of the abolition act are repugnant to the provisions relating to mortgages in the transfer of property act which was extended to vindhya pradesh by the part c states (laws) act, 1950 (no. xxx of 1950) and, therefore, they are void; and, (ii) that under section 6 of the abolition act, the mortgage in suit which was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 1960 (HC)

Lal Bhargavendra Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962MP257

..... and the new province came into being from 23-1-1950. 26-1-1950 after the constitution, vindhya pradesh became a part c state. 1-11-1956 after reorganisation of states, vindhya pradesh became a part of the state of madhya pradesh. 7. we have already said that the order of the raj pramukh in the instant case was passed ..... 4-1950 (ex. d-1). it is pertinent to observe that the first order was passed while the state was the united state of vindhya pradesh and the second order was passed after vindhya pradesh became a part c state under the constitution. the trial court passed contradictory decrees in these two cases, as it considered that the government ..... of india was bound by the state of facts prevailing immediately before the constitution. the learned judge gave no relief in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2006 (HC)

Heavy Electricals Mazdoor Trade Union Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR1180]; (2006)IILLJ1027MP; 2006(1)MPHT551; 2006(2)MPLJ289

..... of the government of india dated 28-4-1951. it was contended before the supreme court on behalf of the appellant that the power given by section 2 of the part c states (laws) act, 1950 was a power of conditional legislation and is different from the power of delegated legislation and such power of conditional legislation was not a recurring power and ..... mr. shrivastava, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, a similar question came up for consideration before the supreme court. section 2 of the part c states (laws) act, 1950 empowered the central government to extend by notification in the official gazette to any part c state or any part of such state with such restrictions and modifications as it thinks fit, any enactment which is in force in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1962 (HC)

Mohanlal Hargovindas Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962MP245

..... in accordance with law. explanation--in this section, law of a state' in relation to a state specified in part c of the first schedule of the constitution, means any law made by the legislative assembly of any of that state or extended to that state by a notification issued under section 2 of the part c states (laws) act, 1950 (30 of 1950).' this section enacts that, notwithstanding ..... any judgment, decree or order of any court, no state law imposing sales tax or purchase tax on transactions made between 1st april 1961 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1985 (HC)

Laxmi Narayan Nayak Vs. Ramratan Chaturvedi and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986MP165; 1986MPLJ261

..... pottery co. ltd., air 1985 madh pra 42 as the full bench was of the view that the enactment was beyond the competence of the state legislature. even under the amended section 100 c.p.c., now letters patent appeals against judgments in second appeals have been abolished.21. i am, therefore, of the view that no appeal should be ..... be tried by the high court, as nearly as may be, in accordance with the procedure applicable under the code of civil procedure. chapter iv-a of that part deals with appeals. under section 116a notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, an appeal shall lie to supreme court on any ..... effect of abrogating the right of appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against the final decision of a single judge in an election petition. the enacting part of section 116a gives no indication that it covers the entire field relating to appeals including appeals against interlocutory orders in addition to providing for appeals against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 1963 (HC)

Mohansingh Laxmansingh Vs. Bhanwarlal Rajmal Nahata and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1964MP137

..... of the election of the petitioner. full particulars of the corrupt practice mentioned in this para are detailed in schedule c which forms part of the petition.'in schedule 'c' to the petition, the respondent-bhanwarlal stated that the appellant made statements of the above type at public meetings held at laduna on 13th january 1962, ..... election of the petitioner.the full particulars of this corrupt practice mentioned in this para are detailed in schedule g which forms part of this petition.'in schedule f the respondent-bhanwarlal stated that the appellant mohansingh made an appeal to the rajput voters on the ground of caste at largely attended meetings held ..... particulars of this corrupt practice mentioned in this para are given in schedule b which forms part of this petition.'in schedules a and b to the petition bhanwarlal, while giving, the particulars of this corrupt practice, stated that mohansingh distributed the said pamphlets on or about 20th february 1962 and 23rd february 1962 at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 1991 (HC)

Mukund Das and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(0)MPLJ767b

..... panchayats and janpad panchayats as the basic units of a government. with the awakening of the desire to participate in the governance of the state, the demand for decentralisation of political power increased. in the erstwhile state of c. p. & berar there were two acts. the central provinces and berar panchayats act, 1946 and the central provinces and berar local ..... also appears to be reasonable. therefore, we hold that section 10 of the adhiniyam is a valid piece of legislation. 22. this takes us now to the consideration of certain parts of section 13 which are as follows : 13.(1) every gram panchayat shall consist of- (i) panchas elected from the wards and elected sarpanch; and (ii) panchas ..... for being a panch of the gram panchayat: provided that the member co-opeted under this sub-section shall have right to speak at and otherwise to lake part in the proceedings of any meeting of gram panchayat or any of its standing committees but shall not be entitled to vote in or move any motion or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1953 (HC)

Mahendra Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Madhya Bharat and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1953CriLJ1409

..... the act applies on such date as the government may by a notification appoint. it is noteworthy that the parliament in enacting section 1(2), part b states (laws) act, 1951 which empowers the government to appoint a suitable date by a notification in the gazette for the commencement of the act, ..... arms act, 1878 is one of the acts specified in the schedule and has been so amended as to include in its territorial extent part b states. it must be noted that section 3 besides amending in certain respects the acts and ordinances specified in the schedule also amends the extant clause ..... to how far 'delegated legislation' is permissible. 'in re article 143, constitution of india and delhi laws act 1912 etc. air 1951 s c 332 (c), and a reference to its final conclusion will show that delegation of the character which section 14 involves cannot on any view be held to be ..... am of the opinion that this application must be dismissed with costs, fixing the counsel's fee at rs. 75/-.shinde, c.j.14. i agree. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //