Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: part c states miscellaneous laws repealing act 1951 schedule i repeals Court: sikkim Page 1 of about 3 results (0.207 seconds)

Sep 15 1978 (HC)

Raj Kumar Rai Vs. State

Court : Sikkim

Reported in : 1979CriLJ310

..... the extension of the central provinces law was to be deemed to have been made without repealing the corresponding vindhya pradesh law.thereafter, parliament passed the part c states (miscellaneous laws) repeal act, 1951, repealing inter alia the vindhya pradesh law with effect from 29th dec. 1950, being the date on which the central provinces ..... government to extend by notifications enactment in force in part a states to part c states, observed (at page 685) that 'when a notification is issued by the appropriate government extending the law of a part a state to a part c state, the law so extended derives its force from section 2 of the part c states (laws) act enacted by parliament' and that ..... may be made in any enactment so extended for the repeal or amendment of any corresponding law...which is for the time being applicable to that part c state.' kania, c. j. and mahajan, j. held that both the power to extend laws and the power to repeal corresponding laws under the provisions quoted above .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1985 (HC)

State of Sikkim Vs. Gyalpo Tshering Tamang and ors.

Court : Sikkim

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1423

..... to be and to have been the law simply because the said code on that date stood repealed by the new code of 1973. both the miscellaneous applications are accordingly dismissed. the records of the cases withdrawn to go down at once for disposal according to law.ripusudan dayal, j.9. i agree. ..... india by and under the constitution, that could not, by itself, result in automatic extension of the all-india enactments to those states and the part b states (laws) act, 1951 had to be passed for extending central acts to those states. the very provisions of clauses (k) and (n) of article 371f, inserted by the constitution (thirty-sixth amendment) act, ..... enactment, say statute 'a', is incorporated by reference in a later enactment, say statute 'b', then the repeal of the statute 'a' by another later enactment, say statute 'c', would not affect, the continued and effective operation of the repealed statute 'a' as referred to in statute 'b' and this clearly demonstrates that the repealed statute 'a', .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1980 (HC)

State of Sikkim Vs. Palden Bhutia

Court : Sikkim

Reported in : 1981CriLJ695

..... f (k) - 'notwithstanding anything in this constitution, all laws in force immediately before the appointed day in the territories comprised in the state of sikkim or any part thereof shall continue to be in force therein until amended or repealed by a competent legislature or other competent authority.section 2 of the ..... its repeal (subject to the schedule of the act) while the second part enforced the statute prospectively. the expression that 'the provisions of the said cr. p.c. 1898... have been the law in force in the territories comprised in the state of sikkim immediately before the commencement of the constitution (thirty-sixth amendment act ..... sikkim act-'the provisions of the cr. p.c. 1898 subject to the exceptions and modifications mentioned in the schedule below have been the law in force in the territories comprised in the state .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //