Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: part c states miscellaneous laws repealing act 1951 schedule i repeals Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 75 results (0.121 seconds)

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , special provisions to income tax and for continuation of facilities in certain state institutions etc. part-viii of the act deals with bhakra-nangal and beas projects while part-ix carries provisions regarding `services'. part-x of the act is loaded with legal and miscellaneous provisions. 26. some of the provisions of parts-vii and x of the 1966 act referred to and/or pressed into ..... where it was functioning or operating immediate before 1st november, 1966, was experienced? b. any tangible material or a fact-finding enquiry established the factum of such obstruction or difficulty? c. the cause(s) of such obstruction or difficulty originated out of the `law', namely, the 1925 act under which the board was established? d. the obstruction or difficulty, if any .....

Tilakram Rambaksh Vs. Bank of Patiala and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1959P& H440

..... . (1) as from the commencement of this constitution - (a) all properly and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in any indian state corresponding to a state specified in part b of the first schedule shall vest in the union, if the purposes for which such property and assets were held immediately before such commencement will thereafter ..... the constitutionality of an enactment and the burden is upon him who attacks it to show that there has been a clear transgression of the constitutional principles; (c) that it must be presumed that the legislature understands and correctly appreciates the need of its own people, that its laws are directed to problems made manifest ..... v. s. r. tendolkar, air 1958 sc 538. after considering all the previous decisions of the supreme court hearing on such a question, s. r. das, c. j., laid down six clear-cut propositions at pages 547-548 of that report-'(a) that a law may be constitutional even though it relates to a single individual .....

Ramesh Birch and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1988P& H281

..... . the learned judges were also of the view that an increase in the rate of duty could have been given effect to in a part c state under the provisions, of s. 2 of the part c states (laws) act, 1950 on the ground that such an extension of the increase in rate would not offend the majority view in re ..... such laws or central enactments indirectly replaces the existing laws which are for the time being applicable to part c states. the division bench observed :--'..........the scheme of s. 22 of the part c states (laws) act is that central acts applicable to part c states have to be left alone. the central government is not given the power by the parliament in any ..... way, to amend or modify the central acts applicable to part c states. parliament is the legislature for part c states and is competent to make laws for such states. it appears that, for this reason no power was conferred on the central government, either to amend or alter a .....

Firm Gauri Lal Gurdev Das Vs. Jugal Kishore Sharma and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1959P& H265

..... 2(5)) and therefore introduced a new clause in section 2(21) defining 'states.' the new clause numbered as 21 reads: ''state' means a part a state or a part c state, and 'states' means all the territories for the time being comprised within part a states and part c states.' section 2(5) defines a 'foreign court' as meaning a court situate ..... by the central government.' the words 'state' and 'states' were defined by the said order as under : -- ' 'state' means a part a state or a part c state,and 'states' means all the territories for the timebeing comprised within part a states and part cstates.' on the basis of the definitions of 'foreign court'and 'states' introduced in the civil procedurecode by ..... both the central act as well as the pepsu laws on this matter are consistent as discussed above and during january 1951 judgment of part a and part c states must be considered to be foreign judgments when sought to be enforced in pepsu courts. in this view of the statutory provisions it .....

Gurbinder Singh and ors. Vs. Lal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1959P& H123

..... which there is of course no warrant at all.the argument is otherwise futile, for there is no doubt that when the code of civil procedure was extended to part 'b' states the intention was that the provisions of the code alone would govern those matters which were expressly provided for in the code. mr. nehra pointed out in this ..... mere procedure, but there are so many authoritative decisions to the contrary starting with the privy council decision in the colonial sugar refining co. ltd. v. irving, 1905 a.c. 369 that it is, i feel, ton late now to advocate that view. lord macnaghten observed in that case ;'the only question is, was the appeal to his ..... the provision contained in sub-section (2) of sec. 49 of ordinance x, 2005 bk. stood repealed, because that was a provision corresponding to a provision contained in section 100 of the code of civil procedure. i shall presently consider mr. nchra's contention in this connection, but it is convenient first to deal with mr. atma ram's argument .....

Tilak Raj Vs. the Chandigarh Administration and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1976P& H238

..... ) as respects any period before the commencement of the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956, shall mean a part a state, a part b state or a part c state; and (b) as respects any period after such commencement, shall mean a state specified in the first schedule to the constitution and shall include a union territory:' 6. mr. dhingra, learned counsel for the petitioner, for his submission that ..... of rs. 4,800/- per month and the compensation amount determined by the competent authority.32. for the reasons stated, the writ petition is dismissed. however, in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.33. in civil miscellaneous application no. 2058 of 1975, the petitioner has claimed modification of this court's order dated 17-7-1975 ..... question by the petitioner, the respondent shall give credit up to any amount that may have been received from the petitioner in this behalf. in view of this, the civil miscellaneous stands disposed of accordingly.

Chander Bhan Vs. Maha Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1965P& H279

..... the rate of stamp duty within the limits of its own jurisdiction. whether this increase could have been given effect to in a part c state under the provision of section 2 of the part c state (laws) act possibly would have presented no difficulty because such an extension would not offend the majority view in the delhi laws act ..... indirectly replaces the existing laws or central enactments which are for the time being applicable to part c states.(7) this argument seems to have force. the scheme of section 2 of the part c states (laws) act is that central acts applicable to part c states act is not given the power by the parliament in any way to amend or modify ..... the executive the power to determine as to which the legislature has already laid down. thus the power of extension which is contemplated by section 2 of the part c states (laws) act, includes the powers of introducing laws which may be in actual conflict with the laws validity established and already in operation in that territory. .....

P.G.F. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2005]124CompCas201(P& H); (2004)4CompLJ288(P& H); [2004]55SCL165(Punj& Har)

..... of insurance to which the insurance act, 1938, applies;(iv) providing for any scheme, pension scheme or the insurance scheme framed under the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952;(v) under which deposits are accepted under section 58a of the companies act, 1956;(vi) under which deposits are accepted by a company declared ..... . in this behalf, learned counsel for the petitioners has invited court's attention to the decision of the supreme court in state of a.p. v. mcdowell & co. [1996] 3 scc 709, relevant part of which, is being extracted hereunder :--'36. in view of our finding that the impugned enactment is perfectly within the legislative ..... credit rating agencies and venture capital funds which play a major role in the development of the capital market which were outside the purview of the board;(c) impose monetary penalties also in addition to or other than penalties of suspension of cancellation of certificate of registration which may not be appropriate in all .....

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

..... female students could have better relations and understanding with a lady principal than a male principal. can this be considered the justification. the action on the part of the state in having a college for imparting education exclusively for ladies can certainly be for their advancement, but, at the same time the argument that only ..... welfare legislation the courts will be justified in straining the language a little to achieve the object of the enactment.'132. dealing with section 125, cr.p.c. justice krishna iyer observed as follows in ramesh chander v. veena kaushal, air 1978 sc 1807 (at p 1809):--'this provision is a measure of social ..... petitioner was considered and he wasaccordingly informed vide annexure p/2. he -was intimated that his grading being low in the merit prepared by the d.p.c., he could not be appointed principal, government collectes, union territory, chandigarh. the other averments regarding his service career have appropriatedly been replied. no justification has .....

S. Iqbal Singh Vs. S. Gurdas Singh Badal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H163

..... no reply has been filed on behalf of shri parkash singh badal, and shri a. s. pooni. on the other hand, they have preferred two applications, civil miscellaneous nos. 25-e and 26-e of 1971, praying that they cannot be impleaded as respondents in the election petition.2. the case was fixed for today to ..... relating to the trial of election petitions even in america. in the american jurisprudence (second edition, volume 26, at page 154, in paragraph 334) it is stated on the subject of parties to an election dispute as follows :--'since election contests are special statutory proceedings, the proper or necessary parties to such proceedings usually are ..... :-- 'no election shall be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with the provisions of this part.' (c) the grounds on which the election petition can be presented are specified in sections 100 and 101. (d) the persons who can present such a petition and the limitation within which it can be presented are .....