Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Parcels - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

1874

Parcels Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1874

Parcels v. Johnson - 87 U.S. 653 (1874) U.S. Supreme Court Parcels v. Johnson, 87 U.S. 20 Wall. 653


Oct 16 1998

Railway Parcel and Goods Handling Mazdoor Union and ors. Vs. Union of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-16-1998

Reported in: (2000)ILLJ1050SC

had been satisfied. We had confined the enquiry by the learned Assistant Labour Commissioner to such of the Parcel Porters, whose names and details had been furnished from pages 32 to 42 in the paper book of


Mar 22 2023

Trichur Railway Parcel Worker'S Co-Op. Society Ltd vs Union of India

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-22-2023

THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 19025 OF 2015 PETITIONER/S: TRICHUR RAILWAY PARCEL WORKER'S CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD., REGISTRATION NO.R 1115, TC-34/130, R.M.LANE, VELIYANNUR, TRICHUR-680021. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MR.K.A.ASHRAF.SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.P.S.SYAMKUTTAN


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 21 2026

KMP Speed Parcel Service, Vs The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Appeals),

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-21-2026

MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN WP No.20361 of 2026 and WMP Nos.21849 & 21853 of 2026 M/s.KMP Speed Parcel Service, Rep. by its Authorised Representative, Mr. Kumaravel Krishnakumar, 401, New Chitrambalam Layout, Ponni Nagar, P.N.Palayam, Coimbatore, Tamil


Mar 25 2026

Prakash Parcel Services Limited vs Beml Limited

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-25-2026

BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 211 OF 2025 BETWEEN: PRAKASH PARCEL SERVICES LIMITED HAVING ITS REGD OFFICE AT NO.18/3, 1ST MAIN, 2ND FLOOR, MISSION ROAD, SAMPANGIRAMA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560027 REPRESENTED


Mar 17 2025

Parcel by Night Private Limited vs the Deputy State Tax Officer-I(St)

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-17-2025

17.03.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy W.P.Nos.9219 & 9224 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10327, 10328 and 10338 of 2025 Tvl. Parcel By night Pvt. Ltd., rep. By its Director, Mr.HR.Shankar ...Petitioner in both W.Ps. Vs.1. The Deputy State Tax


Mar 08 2019

Abt Parcel Service vs the Assistant State Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-08-2019

MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY ,THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1940 PETITIONER: M/S ABT PARCEL SERVICE 66H9-12, NANGUNERI ROAD, PERUMALPURAM, TIRUNELVELI- 627007 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER R.VENKITESH. BY ADVS. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.M.RAJAGOPAL


Jan 25 2002

Abt Parcel Services Vs. Presiding Officer, First Additional Labour Cou ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-25-2002

Reported in: [2002(93)FLR1103]; (2002)IILLJ688Mad

A.K. Rajan, J.1. The petitioner herein has filed the present writ petition challenging the award dated January 21, 1994, passed by the Labour Court in I.D. No. 1478 of 1992.2. The brief facts of the case...


Apr 23 2010

Parcel Carriers (India) Pvt. Ltd. a Private Limited Company Duly Regis ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-23-2010

Reported in: 2010(112)BomLR2258

having their registered office at Vile Parle (E), Mumbai. They had entered into an agreement for leasing of parcel space in train No. 5645-DN, operating between LTT (Kurla) to Guwahati (Assam) for a period of three years


Oct 05 2010

Super Fast Parcel Service (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-05-2010

The Court :- The case of the petitioners is that though they emerged as the highest bidder, for undisclosed reasons the respondents did not invite them for negotiation and participation in the ongoing process in which...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial