Ors V The - Judgment Search Results

K.V.Muralidhar Vs. K.V.Ananda Rao and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5875-5876/2010 K.V.MURALIDHAR APPELLANT(S) VERSUS K.V.ANANDA RAO & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE,J.Heard learned counsel for the parties at length. Upon hearing

V.K. Surendra Vs. V.K. Thimmaiah and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

executed by late Shri Kunnaiah? iii) In the event if the Will dated 14.06.1991 is proved to be valid in law what is the effect of the said Will on the suit schedule properties in the event

V.K. Surendra Vs. V.K. Thimmaiah and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1499 OF 200.V.K. SURENDRA …. APPELLANT VERSUS V.K. THIMMAIAH & ORS. ….RESPONDENTS J UD G M E N T SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.This appeal has

Lalitkumar V. Sanghavi (D) Th Lrs.Neetu Vs. Dharamdas V. Sanghavi and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3148 OF2014[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4267 of 2013]. Lalitkumar V. Sanghavi (D) Th. LRs Neeta Lalit Kumar Sanghavi & Anr. …Appellants Versus Dharamdas V. Sanghavi & Ors. …Respondents

Sivasankar v.k. Vs. V.k.sivan .

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON­REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1206­1207 OF2015SIVASANKAR V.K. ..Appellant Versus V.K. SIVAN AND OTHERS ..Respondents JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.These appeals are presented by the unsuccessful

V.A. Raman Vs. K.V. John and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC2582; JT1998(2)SC62; 1998(1)SCALE660; (1998)9SCC442; [1998]1SCR874

inter alia, in paragraph 2:-'The advice of these 12 candidates will be provisional and their inter se seniority vis-a-vis the open market candidates will be fixed only after the finalisation of the ranked list of open market

theja V. Nagarjuna Vs. V. Nagarjuna

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2000(7)SC342; (2000)9SCC453

is pending before the Family Court, Bangalore.5. Under such circumstances, we transfer Divorce Petition O.P. No. 7/99 titled V. Nagarjuna v. V. Theja pending before I Civil Judge Ranga Reddi District Court, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad to Family

Smt. V. Mangaleswari Vs. V. Balakrishna Reddy and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(2001)ACC732; 2000ACJ1440; JT2000(7)SC496; (2000)9SCC224

side. The learned Counsel for the Respondent-Insurance Company states that the Appellant was not earning anything by playing Veena and it was only her habit. However, the Tribunal itself held that by playing Veena the Appellant was

V.R. Sudhakara Rao and ors. Vs. T.V. Kameswari

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(3)AWC2723(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(3)CHN26; 2007(3)CTC684; JT2007(7)SC252; 2008(1)MhLj1; 2008MPLJ239(SC); 2007(5)SCALE815; (2007)6SCC650

on the file of the same Court. 2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows: One Thangirala Venkata Avadhani filed O.S. No. 131/82 for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants

V.M. Mathew Vs. V.S. Sharma and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC109; JT1995(6)SC318; 1996(1)KLT36(SC); (1996)1MLJ76(SC); 1995(5)SCALE111; (1995)6SCC122; [1995]Supp3SCR131; 1995(2)LC809(SC)

is not admissible. In support thereof, he has placed reliance on the decisions in Dal Bahadur Singh and Ors. v. Bijai Bahadur Singh and Ors. . Sundara Rajali v. Gopala Thevan and Anr. : AIR1934Mad100 and Brajaballav Ghose