Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

theja V. Nagarjuna Vs. V. Nagarjuna

theja V. Nagarjuna vs V. Nagarjuna

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Feb 11, 2000
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/667414

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 861 of 1999
Subject
Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- Section 3(2): [S.B. Sinha & Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, JJ] Grant of Bail u/s 439 Cr.P.C., - Accused charged inter alia under Section 3 of Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Grant of bail was challenged on ground that crime was of grave nature as National Security was jeopardised Trial of accused had not started - Accused ...

Key legal issue
Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

theja V. Nagarjuna

Respondent

V. Nagarjuna

Legal References

Cases Referred
V. Nagarjuna v. V. Theja
Reported In
JT2000(7)SC342; (2000)9SCC453

Excerpt

- section 3(2): [s.b. sinha & dr. mukundakam sharma, jj] grant of bail u/s 439 cr.p.c., - accused charged inter alia under section 3 of official secrets act, 1923 - grant of bail was challenged on ground that crime was of grave nature as national security was jeopardised trial of accused had not started - accused had already undergone pre-trial detention of twenty-two months without even a prima facie determination of seriousness of offence - restrictions already imposed on travelling abroad in earlier matter and no allegation about misuse or abuse of liberty or violation of any conditions held, there is no infirmity in grant of bail in view of facts and circumstance of case. order1. this petition is filed seeking transfer of divorce petition o.p. no. 7/99 pending before i senior civil judge, ranga reddi district court, saroor nagar, hyderabad, to the family court at bangalore.2. notice was issued to the respondent and the office report shows that although the respondent has been served but has not put in appearance in this case. we, therefore, decide the matter ex-parte.3. in the petition, petitioner has stated that she is unable to meet the expenditure of travel to hyderabad from bangalore for attending the day-to-day proceeding of the divorce petition and moreover she has a minor son and excepting her aged parents there is none to accompany her to hyderabad.4. the petitioner has already filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights which is pending before the family court, bangalore.5. under such circumstances, we transfer divorce petition o.p. no. 7/99 titled v. nagarjuna v. v. theja pending before i civil judge ranga reddi district court, saroor nagar, hyderabad to family court at bangalore to be heard and decided along with m.c. no. 632/99, pending before the family court at bangalore.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. This petition is filed seeking transfer of Divorce Petition O.P. No. 7/99 pending before I Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddi District Court, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad, to the Family Court at Bangalore.

2. Notice was issued to the Respondent and the office report shows that although the respondent has been served but has not put in appearance in this case. We, therefore, decide the matter ex-parte.

3. In the petition, petitioner has stated that she is unable to meet the expenditure of travel to Hyderabad from Bangalore for attending the day-to-day proceeding of the Divorce Petition and moreover she has a minor son and excepting her aged parents there is none to accompany her to Hyderabad.

4. The petitioner has already filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights which is pending before the Family Court, Bangalore.

5. Under such circumstances, we transfer Divorce Petition O.P. No. 7/99 titled V. Nagarjuna v. V. Theja pending before I Civil Judge Ranga Reddi District Court, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad to Family Court at Bangalore to be heard and decided along with M.C. No. 632/99, pending before the Family Court at Bangalore.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial