Ors V S K - Judgment Search Results

C.V.S.K. Sharma (Dr.), I.A.S., Commissioner and Special Officer, Great ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(4)ALT796

D.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard both sides.2. This Contempt Appeal is directed against the order, dated 19-6-2009, passed by a learned … suit for partition, in which the present property was shown in the name of one Mohd. Jameeluddin. One Kamaluddin, who claims to be the successor of the original owner, disposed of a part of the disputed property

M/S V.S.K.Ferro Alloys Limited, and anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda, and anr.

Court: Chennai

to be passed. Thereafter the Debt Recovery Certificate bearing No.12 of 2006 dated 6.2.2006 was also drawn. The said Debt Recovery Certificate was transferred to Debt Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai, and numbered as DRC No.356 of 2007. Subsequently,

V.S.K Sood Vs. Vir Surinder Beri and ors

Court: Delhi

NEW DELHI I.A. No. 20366/2011in CS(OS) 1386/2011 Reserved on:13. h August, 2013 Decided on:26. h August, 2013 % V.S.K SOOD Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. B.S. Bagga and Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates. versus VIR SURINDER BERI & ORS

V.S.K. Adhi Chettiar Suravelu Chettiar, Tanners, Vaniyambadi and ors. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1957Mad603; [1957]8STC274(Mad)

Rule 16 (2) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules, these petitioners were assessed to sales-tax on the total volume of their purchases. The assessments in dispute relate to the year 1951-52. The assessing officer as well as … 1. The petitioners in this batch of revision cases are licensed tanners carrying on business in several places in the North Arcot District, Under Rule 16 (2) of the Turnover and Assessment Rules, these petitioners … the income from all invested personal properly, bonds, stocks, investments of all kinds, it is obvious that by far the largest part of the anticipated

V.S.K.Murthy Vs. P.Srinivasan

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

taken cognizance of the case complaint and thereafter, after the appearance of opposite party and on entertaining written version etc., and while conducting the enquiry came to know that the complaint is not maintainable before the District … and to pay cost. The District Forum, return back to the complaint to approach proper Forum. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the opposite party, praying to set aside the order of the District … on entertaining written version etc., and while conducting the enquiry came to know that the complaint is not maintainable before the District Forum due to

V.S.K.M. Subramania Pillai and anr. Vs. Paramasivan Pillai

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 24Ind.Cas.864

ought to have been exonerated from his suretyship under Section 135 of the Indian Contract Act.2. Damodar Das v. Muhammad Hussain 22 A. 351 : A.W.N. (1900) 106. is relied upon by the petitioner to show that … Tyabji, J.1. The question is whether , the 2nd defendant ought to have been exonerated from his suretyship under Section 135 of the Indian Contract Act.2. Damodar Das v. Muhammad Hussain 22 A. 351 : A.W.N.

D.L.M.M. Sharma Vs. C.V.S.K. Sarma and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALD197; 2002(2)ALT303

V.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner filed this contempt case alleging that the respondents have flouted the orders of this

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. V.S.K. Adi Chetty Suravel Chetty

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2002]254ITR633(Mad)

The word used in the section is 'may'. The Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa : [1972]83ITR26(SC) , has laid down that the penalty will not be imposed merely because … R. Jayasimha Babu, J.1. The Assessing Officer has discretion under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whether or not to initiate penalty proceedings. The word used in the

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Madras-i Vs. P. V. S. K. Palania ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1980)17CTR(Mad)347; [1980]125ITR357(Mad)

SETHURAMAN J. - The following questions have been referred by the Tribunal under s. 256(2) of the I.T. Act, … assessee is a manufacturer of aerated water under the trade name 'Kali Mark'. It has a factory at Virudhunagar. In the original assessment made for each of the assessment years 1964-65 to 1969-70, the assessee claimed depreciation

A.P. Nachimuthu Vs. V.S.K. Ramaswami Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1957Mad221; (1953)2MLJ556

width.' 2. Apparently both of them were anxious to obtain a licence for a touring talkie in the village of Avadathur, within the limits of the Jalakanta-puram panchayat board in the Salem District and both of them … respondent) are proprietors of two rival touring talkies. Rule 18 (a) of the aforesaid rules runs thus:'No license shall be granted under the Act for the use of any temporary building for public resort or entertainment unless … is situated to the north east of the cinema shed. There is Kambu crop in a portion beyond the vacant space. South: There is 74