Skip to content


Ordered - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: ordered Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.208 seconds)
Aug 03 2004 (HC)

Shri Sadashiv Sakharam Vs. Additional Director General and Special Ins ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-03-2004

Reported in: 2004(6)BomCR617; 2005(1)MhLj243

..... 1 did not accept the petitioner s reply and passed an order imposing the penalty of removal from service petitioner filed an ..... the petitioner cannot be accepted there is no reason why the order passed by the mat should be interfered with while exercising ..... freedom of investigation is the essence of these provisions but in order to suppress the mischief it is sufficiently indicated under different .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2004 (HC)

Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rakesh Chandra Gangwar and ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-31-2004

Reported in: (2004)3UPLBEC2447

has allowed the writ petitions and has quashed the impugned orders hence these appeals 4 a preliminary objection had been raised

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 13 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Raj Forging and Gears Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-13-2004

Reported in: (2006)(197)ELT271TriDel

1 revenue filed this appeal against the order in appeal passed by the commissioner appeals 2 the contention of the revenue is that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 2004 (TRI)

Axel Polymers Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(97)ECC413

..... without payment of duty under the cover of exemption notification we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2004 (TRI)

V.S. Bengani and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Jul-08-2004

Reported in: (2006)STR139

..... not permissible in the law 4 in view of the discussions made above the impugned order of the deputy commissioner is set aside and the case is remanded back to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2004 (TRI)

Galaxy Clocks Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-08-2004

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT378Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the appeal is directed against the order in appeal whereby the claim of the appellants to avail modvat credit on capital goods .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 2004 (TRI)

G. Jayachandran Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-06-2004

Reported in: (2005)(98)ECC227

..... of the customs act we therefore do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the ld commissioner and we uphold the same and sustain the penalty of rs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 2004 (TRI)

Seth Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-06-2004

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT207TriDel

..... pre deposit of penalty of rs 50 56 275 imposed on them under the impugned order 2 shri j s agrawal learned advocate submitted that the applicants manufacture m s ingots .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 2004 (TRI)

i.C.i. (i) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-02-2004

..... case before classification is arrived at under heading 3402 that has not been done the order is therefore to be set aside and matter remitted back for re determination after ascertainment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 2004 (TRI)

Carrara Marble and Granite Inds. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-02-2004

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT482Tri(Mum.)bai

..... were not available for confiscation hence the appeal 3 the learned advocate strongly contested the order of confiscation and imposition of penalties it is argued that the goods on examination were .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //