Ordered - Judgment Search Results
Civil Writ Petition No. 22723 of 2011 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No. 2272 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
Jalandhar. The short point that arises for adjudication is, whether the Director, Land Records, Punjab, Jalandhar, could have ordered transfer/exchange of the Gram Panchayat Property and, if so empowered, could pass the impugned order without impleading the
Civil Writ Petition No.25543 of 2012 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.25543 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
petitioner at some length and gone through various documents. 9].In our considered view, no interference with the impugned orders passed by the respondent-authorities in rejecting CWP No.25543 of 2012 [4].the petitioner's complaint or in upholding the allotment
Civil Writ Petition No.24971 of 2012 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.24971 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
the petitioners in case they succeed in the revision petitions, auction to that extent may not be confirmed. Ordered accordingly. Let a copy of this order be given dasti to Mr.Mikhail Kad, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, under
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Civil Writ Petition No.2291 of 2009 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.2291 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
Singh entered the word “stay”. on the Nakal Jamabandi despite of the fact that there was no stay ordered by any Court restraining transfer of land of the petitioner. Prabh Singh was portrayed as a land grabber
Civil Writ Petition No.4039 of 1988 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.4039 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
development by the then Municipal Committee (not Municipal Corporation).Bhathinda. COCP Nos.1275 & 1548 of 2007, which have been ordered to be heard alongwith these cases are also being disposed of. [2].For brevity, the facts are being extracted
Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1984 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.651 of 1 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J.(Oral) This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.651, 2030, 658, 2028, 2029, 571, 644, 652, 653, 654, 655, 656,
Civil Writ Petition No.4498 of 1993 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.4498 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
Reporters or not?.”3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos.4498, 4102, 4117, 4478, 5029, 8042, 3700, 3831, 3933, 3956, 3958, 3960,
Civil Writ Petition No. 9973 of 2013(Oandm) Vs. Civil Writ Petition No ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-2013
a statue of a resident of the village, who died while working in the Border Security Force. An order dated 09.05.2013 was passed by this Court while issuing notice of motion. A relevant extract of this order
Civil Writ Petition No.5973 of 2010 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.5973 of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 3.8.2009 (Annexure P-10) passed by respondent No.2-Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, rejecting his claim for allotment of a
Civil Writ Petition No.18593 of 2013 Vs. Civil Writ Petition No.18593 ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
copies of the writ petition be supplied to learned State counsel during the couRs.of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. In
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free