Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Raj Forging and Gears Ltd.

Commissioner of C. Ex. vs Raj Forging and Gears Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jul 13, 2004
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/35918

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue
Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Respondent

Raj Forging and Gears Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2006)(197)ELT271TriDel

Excerpt

1. revenue filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal passed by the commissioner (appeals).2. the contention of the revenue is that the appellant took credits of rs. 2 lakh each on 14.10.97 and 24.10.97 in pla whereas the amounts were deposited in govt. accounts on 15.10.97 and 25.10.97. therefore, there was no sufficient balance in the pla at the time of clearance of the goods on 14.10.97 and 24.10.97.3. the contention of the respondent is that the cheques were presented in bank on 14.10.97 and 24.10.97 in pursuance to the deposit of the presentation of the cheque. the amounts were credited on the next day in govt. account and the date of presentation of cheque is the date on which they can take credit. the respondent relied upon the board circular no. 86/2003-cus., dated 3.10.2003 where it was clarified that in respect of central excise duty and service tax, the date of payment will be the date of presentation of the cheque in the bank subject to realisation of the cheque. in the present case, the cheques were not dishonoured by the bank. in view of the above, i find no merit in the appeal, the same is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. Revenue filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals).

2. The contention of the Revenue is that the appellant took credits of Rs. 2 lakh each on 14.10.97 and 24.10.97 in PLA whereas the amounts were deposited in Govt. Accounts on 15.10.97 and 25.10.97. Therefore, there was no sufficient balance in the PLA at the time of clearance of the goods on 14.10.97 and 24.10.97.

3. The contention of the respondent is that the cheques were presented in bank on 14.10.97 and 24.10.97 in pursuance to the deposit of the presentation of the cheque. The amounts were credited on the next day in Govt. account and the date of presentation of cheque is the date on which they can take credit. The respondent relied upon the Board Circular No. 86/2003-Cus., dated 3.10.2003 where it was clarified that in respect of Central Excise Duty and Service Tax, the date of payment will be the date of presentation of the cheque in the bank subject to realisation of the cheque. In the present case, the cheques were not dishonoured by the bank. In view of the above, I find no merit in the appeal, the same is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial