Ordered - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: ordered Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.109 seconds)Shri D.K. Rajepandhare, Ex-joint Civil Judge and J.M. Satara Vs. State ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-26-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR858; 2005(6)BomCR288; 2005(4)MhLj1067
..... was the conduct of the delinquent in passing the impugned orders when such orders were passed in quick service and whether such matters could ..... enquiry its consideration has to be reflected in a reasoned order the order must contain findings on each charge and they must be ..... 20 years of service on the date of the impugned order the order of compulsory retirement cuts short his service but gives him .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Eva Mary Elezabath Vs. Jayaraj,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2005
Reported in: AIR2005Mad452
..... gopal agarwala and ors that in an application seeking a writ of habeas corpus for custody of minor child the principal consideration for the ..... child samuel rily macon before this court and pass suitable orders for custody 2 according to the petitioner she and her ..... s welfare and education have got highly affected hence this habeas corpus petition 3 according to the first respondent after the death .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Krishnaveni Vs. the Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-09-2005
Reported in: 2006CriLJ757; 2005(5)CTC518
..... detenu it was not possible for the detenus to make an effective representation against the order of detention to the detaining authority mr rana appearing for the respondent submitted that although ..... authority must offer to the detenu the earliest opportunity of making representation against the detention order these are the safeguards to be made before an executive authority can be permitted to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBihar State Sugar Corporation Vs. Commr. of Central Excise and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Nov-07-2005
..... processed in their factory he submits that in an identical case this tribunal vide its order no a 1093 kol 2001 dated 4 10 2001 had allowed their appeal which is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarapur Coatings and Adhesives Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-11-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT44Tri(Mum.)bai
1 these three appeals arise out of two separate orders by commissioner appeals appeal no e 1386 98 arises out of the demand confirmed by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRama Newsprint and Papers Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-15-2005
..... above we find merit in the appellants contention 2 the appeals are thus allowed the order of the commissioner is accordingly set aside
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWool Worth (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jul-14-2005
..... not been passed on to the buyers i do not find any infirmity in the orders of the authorities below the appeal deserves to be dismissed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.T.K. Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-13-2005
..... 43 in table to notification 10 2002 2 1 in view of the findings the order is set aside and the appeal is allowed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTriton Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-12-2005
..... imposed was to the tune of rs 2 64 400 on appeal against the above order the commissioner appeals rejected the same hence the present appeal 3 shri dipen lathi ld .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEicher Tractors Ltd., Shri V.P. Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2005
..... the applicants are liable to pay the disputed amount of duty demanded in the impugned order 5 we find that in this case the duty is demanded in respect of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial