Non Core - Judgment Search Results

Core Vs. Vinal

Court: US Supreme Court

Core v. Vinal - 117 U.S. 347 (1886) U.S. Supreme Court Core v. Vinal, 117 U.S. 347 (1886) Core

United States Vs. Cores

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Cores - 356 U.S. 405 (1958) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Cores, 356 U.S. 405 (1958) United States

Core Minerals Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court: Chennai

DATED:10. 7.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI C.M.A.Nos.285 and 1320 of 2014 Core Minerals TVH Belica Towers, 5th Floor Tower 2, No.94, MRC Nagar Chennai  600 028. .. Appellant in … Order No.40191 of 2014, dated 21.3.2014 passed by the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant for non-compliance of the stay order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.3. The substantial question of law

M/S. Core Foundations and Developers Private Limited vs the District P ...

Court: Kerala

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1946 PETITIONER: M/S. CORE FOUNDATIONS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED KANJOOPARAMBIL BUILDINGS, CONVENT ROAD, KOVILVATTOM DESOM, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS

M/s.Core Plasto Enterprises, Vs Joint Director General of Foreign Trad ...

Court: Chennai

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & C.M.P.Nos.31654 & 31664 of 2025 M/s. Core Plasto Enterprises Rep. by its Partner A-22, Phase III, Sidco Thiru Vi Ka Indl Estate Guindy Appellant in … till the passing of adjudication order. It appears that recovery proceedings have also been issued on account of non-fulfillment of obligation under Foreign Trade Regulation Act.3. Be that as it may, though we are not inclined to

Core Tech Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India,

Court: Kerala

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1941 WP(C).No.5950 OF 2020(P) PETITIONER/S: CORE TECH INFO SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR G.MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI, MURALIKA KRRA 24A, KRISHNA TOWERS TC

Core Healthcare Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2004]121CompCas77(Guj); (2004)3GLR706; [2004]54SCL138(Guj); [2005]139STC116(Guj)

the decisions being relied upon for the petitioner. On carefully going through them, we have noticed that in none of them have the courts countenanced a company registered as a sick industrial company retaining current sales tax

Core Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Standard Chartered Bank

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2001]106CompCas70(Guj)

adopted by the respondent-company on the court, the application made by the respondent-company to the BIFR itself is non estin the sense that it has no legal sanctity in view of the statement made before the Court … 1. The applicant, Core Healthcare Ltd., has filed these two applications with a prayer to review the order dated 2-5-2000, passed by

Core Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Standard Chartered Bank and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2001]107CompCas501(Guj)

vires, (ii) the authority had no jurisdiction and (iii) there was denial of natural justice. According to him none of the three factors were present in the case of the petitioner and as such the petition should

Core Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2006(198)ELT21(Guj)

12(1)(b) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, even payment was made by a crossed cheque of same date 30-11-1998 under cheque number mentioned in the order.10. Similarly