Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-23-2019
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE2D DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH AND CRIMINAL REFERRED CASE NO.1 OF2018C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1067 OF2018IN CRIMINAL REFERRED CASE NO.1 OF2018BETWEEN : THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001. (SUO MOTU BY SRI H.S. CHANDRAMOULI, STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)... APPELLANT AND: SALEEM SON OF ABDUL KHAYAM NOW AGED35YEARS NO.70/4, 13TH A CROSS BESIDES MEMORIAL MASJID GORIPALYA BENGALURU-560 026. (BY SRI. N.R. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE)... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL REFERRED CASE IS REGISTERED AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION366(1) CR.P.C. FOR CONFIRMATION OF DEATH SENTENCE AWARDED TO ACCUSED SALEEM BY JUDGMENT DATED2401.2018 PASSED IN S.C.NO.147/2012 ONF THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SESSIONS AND RETYPED AND REPLACED VIDE ORDER DATED2308.2019 2 RAMANAGARA FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS376AND302OF INDIAN PENAL CODE. IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-30-2019
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JULY2019BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA I.A.NO.1/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.21 OF2017BETWEEN : M/S SURABHI CHITS LIMITED OFFICE AT NO.5, GAJENDRA TOWERS, 11TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560085 AND BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.24/1, ADARSHA COMPLEX, CRESCENT ROAD, SHIVANANDA CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MARKETING MANAGER SRI. VISHWANATH PATIL S/O RACHAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT31YEARS... APPELLANT (BY SRI: V. RAVI PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND SRI GANSHYAM T S/O TARACHAND, AGED ABOUT56YEARS, R/AT GHAR KA KAHANA2DELICIOUS VEGETARIAN HOME FOODS , NO.104, WILSON VINTAGE APARTMENTS, 14TH CROSS, OPP. NEW AUDUGODI POST OFFICE WILSON GARDEN, BANGALORE-560030... RESPONDENT (BY SRI: B PRAMOD, ADVOCATE) THIS I.A.1/2017 IS FILED UNDER SECTION3784) OF CRPC PRAYING TO GRANT SPECIAL LEAVE TO FILE THE ABOVE APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT IN CC.NO.33441/2014 DATED710.2016 IN THE COURT OF...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-17-2019
1 NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1560 OF2019PREM SINGH APPELLANT(S) Versus SUKHDEV SINGH & OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1561 OF2019JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.These appeals by the victim as well as by the State are directed against the judgment dated 24.07.2013 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal of the accused and set aside the judgment of the trial court whereby the respondents herein were convicted for various offences punishable under Sections 148, 2 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, and sentenced to various terms including life imprisonment.2. We do not intend to give detailed facts of the case. The gist of the case is that on 25.05.2005, accused Jagir Singh had caused injuries to Palwinder Kaur, who is the sisterinlaw of Prem Singh (PW1). Prem Singh (PW1) had gone to the milk chilling centre at Lopoke, because his father was contesting election...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-05-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8139 OF2019(DIARY No.38432 OF2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) LT. COL. OM DUTT SHARMA (RETD.) DEAD THROUGH LRS & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1)2) The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur1 on 9th February, 2017 whereby, an Original Application filed by the respondent - Lt. Col. Om Dutt Sharma was allowed holding that the respondent is entitled to the benefit of One Rank One Pension2. The respondent died during pendency of the appeal. His legal heirs have been brought on record, whereas respondent Nos. 3 to 86 have been impleaded as intervenors vide order dated 14th May, 1 2 for short, Tribunal for short, OROP 1 2018 in view of the fact that the said intervenors claim the same benefit as claimed and granted to the deceased respondent. Since the issue is purely legal and the fact that large num...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2017 Decided on:8. h January, 2019 CS(OS) 205/2009 RODERICK JOHN ANDREW MACKENZIE..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.Kirti S. Javali and Ms.Nikita C. Jain, Advocates. Versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. + Crl. M.A. No.5011/2009 in CS(OS) 210/2009 HIMACHAL HELICOPTER SKIING PTY LTD...... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Kirti S. Javali, Advocate. versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD...... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Roderick John Andrew Mackenzie, the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.205/2009 filed the suit inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants their employees, servants, agents etc. from using or otherwise copying, selling, offering for sale, counterfeit/unlicensed versions of the plaintiffs copyright in his artistic work HIMLAYAN ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2017 Decided on:8. h January, 2019 CS(OS) 205/2009 RODERICK JOHN ANDREW MACKENZIE..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.Kirti S. Javali and Ms.Nikita C. Jain, Advocates. Versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. + Crl. M.A. No.5011/2009 in CS(OS) 210/2009 HIMACHAL HELICOPTER SKIING PTY LTD...... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Kirti S. Javali, Advocate. versus HIMALAYAN HELI SERVICES PVT. LTD...... Defendant Represented by: Mr.Vivek Malik and Mr.Mukul Thakur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Roderick John Andrew Mackenzie, the plaintiff in CS(OS) No.205/2009 filed the suit inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants their employees, servants, agents etc. from using or otherwise copying, selling, offering for sale, counterfeit/unlicensed versions of the plaintiffs copyright in his artistic work HIMLAYAN ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h January, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12133/2016 % 1. AKHIL DELHI PRATHMIK SHIKSHAK SANGH Through: Mr. P.S. Sridhar Raj, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC-North DMC/R-1 with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan and Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. Mr. Rakesh Mittal, SC-SDMC with Ms.Yamini Mittal, Adv. for R-2/SDMC Mr. G.D. Mishra, EDMC/R-5 SC- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed by an organisation going by the moniker Akhil Delhi Prathmik Shikshak Sangh, which purports to be a society, registered under the Societies Registration Act, comprising, inter alia, various teachers of schools run by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and espousing their cause.2. The writ petition ventilates a grievance against devolution, on teachers in government schools, of duties which are not linked to education, specifically opening of bank a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-24-2019
$~19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2712/2016 STATE Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ........ Petitioner for the State with SI Nepal Singh, PS CR Park. versus SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: Respondent in person. ..... Respondent ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.76/2007 of the subject case was registered on the compliant of Phool Singh, a delivery-man, engaged by a firm named and styled as Kalkaji Gas Service, the duties entrusted to him being to take gas cylinders from the godown of his employer in a three wheeler scooter (TSR) and deliver the same to the respective consumers, as per instructions.2. It is alleged that, on 16.03.2007, he having carried twenty-two gas cylinders from the godown of his employer, had reached near house No.1520 in C.R. Park, New Delhi at about 1:45 p.m., he was accosted by four persons who had come to the place in an Indica car bearing registration N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!