Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-10-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h March, 2019 Date of decision:10. h May, 2019 SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD ..... Plaintiff CS (COMM) 622/2018 & I.A. 12663/2014 Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Devyati Nath and Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Advocates (M:98919. 9028). AJANTA PHARMA LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, versus Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Afzal B. Khan and Ms. Suhrita Majundar, Advocates (M:98818. 0037). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. Is the test for infringement and passing off for nutraceutical products the same as the test applicable for pharmaceuticals?.2. The dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant in the present case is in respect of two products used by patients of age related dimness of vision and diabetic retinopathy. They are sold under the trademarks GLOEYE and GLOTAB. Both are ocular medicines. Since they contain plant extracts, they are termed as nutraceuticals under Section 22...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16. 05.2019 + W.P.(C) 1163/2017 and CM APPL. 38867/2017 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms Archana Shanker, Mr Shrawan Chopra, Ms Prachi Agarwal, Mr Devinder Rawat, Mr Pundreek Dwivedi and Ms Ridhie Bajaj. :Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Waize Ali Noor and Ms Shruti Dutt for UOI. Mr Vishal Sudan and Ms Prachi Tiwari for R-3. Mr J.Sai Deepak, Mr Guru Narang and Mr Avinash K. Sharma, Advocates for R-5. Ms Bitika Sharma, Ms Mansee Teotia and Ms Lakshay Kaushik, Advocates for R-7. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 08.11.2016 passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs (hereafter the Controller), W.P.(C) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-24-2019
$~ * + + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 955/2018 SEEMA alias PRABHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with versus Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Raju Yadav, PS Sultanpuri, Delhi. AND CRL.A. 757/2018 KISHORE KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Advocate with Mr. Narsingh Narain Rai and Mr. Indu Bhushan Vimal, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Raju Yadav, PS Sultanpuri, Delhi. Date of Decision:24. h May, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Crl.A.No.757/2018 & 955/2018 JUDGMENT Page 1 of 47 MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. While Crl.A.955/2018 has been filed by appellant-accused Seema @ Prabha, Crl.A. 757/2018 has been filed by appellant-accused Kishore Kumar challenging the judgment dated 22nd December, 2017 convicting them under Sect...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-24-2019
$~ * + + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 955/2018 SEEMA alias PRABHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with versus Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Raju Yadav, PS Sultanpuri, Delhi. AND CRL.A. 757/2018 KISHORE KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Advocate with Mr. Narsingh Narain Rai and Mr. Indu Bhushan Vimal, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Raju Yadav, PS Sultanpuri, Delhi. Date of Decision:24. h May, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Crl.A.No.757/2018 & 955/2018 JUDGMENT Page 1 of 47 MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. While Crl.A.955/2018 has been filed by appellant-accused Seema @ Prabha, Crl.A. 757/2018 has been filed by appellant-accused Kishore Kumar challenging the judgment dated 22nd December, 2017 convicting them under Sect...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-27-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 701/2017 % Judgment reserved on:20. h May, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:27. h May, 2019 MANNU STATE Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. ....Appellant Versus Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J1 The present Appeal is instituted on behalf of the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment of conviction dated 25.03.2017 and order on sentence dated 03.04.2017 passed by the Court of Special Judge (NDPS-01), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in Session Case No.56203/2016 in FIR No.455/2012, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentence...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-28-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h May, 2019 CS(COMM) 3/2018, IA No.90/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.92/2018 (u/s 80(2) CPC) RAJ REWAL ..... PLAINTIFF Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vedanta Varma, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Rupin Bahl & Mr. Akhil Kumar Gola, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... DEFENDANTS Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Yuvraj, Ms. Sneh Suman & Mr. Neil Mason, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The question for consideration is, whether an Architect, as author of 1. artistic work of architecture in the form of a building or structure having an artistic character or design and having a copyright therein, upon the owner of the land on which building is constructed choosing to demolish the said building to construct another building in its place, has a right to restrain the owner from doing so and if the building has been demolished, to demand compensation therefo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-28-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved:11. hSeptember 2018 Judgement Pronounced:28. h May, 2019 + FAO(OS) 202/2017 M/S TEKNOW CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr.Karan Luthra and Ms.Malavika Lal, Advocates. versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pallav Kumar and Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 against the judgment dated 16.03.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge setting aside in part the Award of the Sole Arbitrator dated 30.04.2015 with regard to pendente lite interest. FAO(OS) 202/2017 Page 1 of 24 2. Some necessary facts, which are required ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:19. 03.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:30. 05.2019 CRL.A.1013/2018 MAHABIR MEHTO STATE versus . Appellant .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Madhav Khurana and Ms. Trisha Mittal, Advocates : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP with SI Sunder Singh, PS-Baba Haridas Nagar CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted under the provision of section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) assails the judgment dated 27.04.2018 and the order on sentence dated 14.05.2018, rendered by the learned Additional Session Judge-01, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in Session Case No.440846/2016, title as State vs. CRL.A. 1013/2018 Page 1 of 29 Mahabir Mehto, emanating from F.I.R No.216/2013 (hereinafter referred to as the subject FIR) under sectionsof the Indian Pena...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :16. 05.2019. Date of Decision :31. 05.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: + RC.REV. 72/2016 and CM APPL. 4199/2016 (Stay) RAJESHWAR DAYAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Mukul Kumar and Mr. P.D. Sharma, Advocates versus PREETI GUPTA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ravish K. Goyal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. The present proceedings instituted under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as DRC Act) assail the impugned order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the ACJ/CCJ/ARC, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in E-118/2013 whereby the application of the petitioner/tenant seeking leave to defend was dismissed and consequently an order of eviction of the petitioner/tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act was passed qua the tenanted premises i.e, shop on the ground floor of property bearing no.530, Chatta Hingamal, Chotta Bazar, Shahdara, Delhi-32. R.C.Rev.72/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-31-2019
$~21 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Judgement pronounced on:31. t May, 2019 + CRL.A. 681/2017 BIPLAV BISWAS .... Appellant Through: Mr. KTS Tulsi, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Faraz Khan, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State .... Respondent CRL.A. 705/2017 DEEPAK .... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 1161/2017 DEEPAK .... Appellant Through: Mr. SB Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State .... Respondent CRL.A. 6/2018 HARDEEP .... Appellant Through: Ms. Swati Rathi, Advocate along with Mr. Rohit Boora, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 681/2017 & other connected matters Page 1 of 58 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHI...
Tag this Judgment!