Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Mar-01-2014
1. On 26.06.2012, a learned Single Judge of this Court took notice of the news published in various newspapers on 26.06.2012 indicating that on a call of the Indian Medical Association, doctors in various government hospitals and dispensaries remained off their duties on 25.06.2012 and consequently several deaths were reported. The learned Single Judge has taken note of Regulations 2.1.1 and 2.4 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 which read as under: 2.1.1. œThough a physician is not bound to treat each and every person asking his services, he should not only be ever ready to respond to the calls of the sick and the injured, but should be mindful of the high character of his mission and the responsibility he discharges in the course of his professional duties. In his treatment, he should never forget that the health and the lives of those entrusted to his care depend on his skill and attention. A physician should endeavour...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The solitary appellant has preferred this appeal against his conviction for the offences under Sections 307 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo respectively rigorous imprisonment for 10 and 7 years with a fine of Rs. 1000/- each for both the offences, however, the sentences are to run concurrently, as awarded on 22nd June, 2002, by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. “ II, Aurangabad, in connection with Session Trial No. 128/89 / 161/2002 arising out of Kutumba P.S. Case No. 10/89. 3. The case was instituted against unknown for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code on the Fardbeyan of one Yogendra Tiwary (P.W.6) recorded on 5th February 1989 at 04 hours by S.I. Mundrika Prasad (P.W.9) which reveals that at about 1.00 a.m. while the entire family members were sleeping suddenly the informant awoke on hearing the sound of firing and foun...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Feb-05-2014
1. Appellant Pappu Kumar Mandal has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 20 of the NDPS Act vide judgment dated 31.10.2013 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years as well as also fined of Rs.1,00000/- in default thereof to undergo R.I. for two years vide order dated 12.11.2013 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge under NDPS Act, Khagaria in Special Case No.02 of 2010 arising out of Naugachhia Rail P.S.Case No.09 of 2010. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief as per self statement of ASI Bhagwan Prasad Singh(P.W.2) drawn on 31.03.2010 is that during course of escort of 322 Dn. along with police personnel they have perceived suspicious activity of a passenger who attempted to conceal a bag and Jhola over which he was interrogated. He disclosed his identity as Pappu Kumar Mandal. On query with regard to bag and Jhola, he became perplexed and tried to flee. In presence of escort party, the bag and Jhola was searched. From bag three packets of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-27-2014
Verma Sunil Criminal Appeal No.S.929 -SB of 2013 1 2014.06.17 10:37 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.S.929 -SB of 2013 Date of decision 27.05.2014. Raju Singh ...... Appellant. versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent. CORAM :- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.C.PURI.1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present : Mr. Anil Chaudhary, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Ajaib Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. K.C.PURI, J.Raju Singh accused-appellant has directed the present appeal against the judgment and order dated 18.10.2013 passed by Shri Virinder Aggarwal, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur vide which he stood convicted under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short the IPC) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years.2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 25.8.2010 Lachhman Dass c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present: The Honble Justice Arindam Sinha W.P.No.1936 of 1995 India Trident Maritime PVT.LTD.& ORS.Vs The Board of Trustees for the Port of Calcutta & ORS.For the Petitioner For the Respondents : Mr.Tilak Kr. Bose, Sr.Adv.Ms.Nilanjana Adhya, Adv.: Mr.S.K.Roychowdhury, Adv.Ms.Kumkum Das(Dutta).Adv.Heard on : 05.06.2014 and 10.06.2014. Judgment on : 25th June, 2014. Arindam Sinha, J. The petitioners being steamer agent and shipowner had by this writ petition prayed for issuance of mandamus upon the Kolkata Port Trust and Customs to forthwith release 78 containers belonging to them upon allocating suitable space for storage of the cargo contained therein and for refund of ground rent debited to their marine account. By order dated 12th February, 1996 of this court the said two Authorities were directed to allow the petitioners to de-stuff the cargo in the 78 containers within one week therefrom and, thereafter, t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-01-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t July, 2014 % + CS(OS) 2589/2013 M/S ALLIED BLENDERS & DISTILLERS PVT. LTD.....Plaintiff Through: Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina and Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Shrawan Chopra & Ms. T. Saukshmya, Advs. Versus SHREE NATH HERITAGE LIQUOR PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sumit Rajput, Ms. Aastha Jain, Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad and Mr. Rajul Jain, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.IA No.20759/2013 (of the plaintiff u/O XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from selling, distributing, advertising or dealing in alcoholic beverages especially Indian made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) or goods of any description bearing the trade mark Collectors Choice or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trade mark Officers Choice and amounting to infringement of the plaintiffs registered trade m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-03-2014
CWP No.19704 of 2003 (O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19704 of 2003 (O & M) Reserved on: 21.05.2014 Date of decision: 03.07.2014 Rati Ram and others ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr.Gaurav Singh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 8. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. The present judgment shall dispose of 3 writ petitions i.e.CWP Nos.19704 of 2003, Rati Ram and others versus State of Haryana and otheRs.CWP No.13621 of 2004, Jaipal Singh and others versus State of Haryana and others and CWP No.19691 of 2005, Nepal Singh and others versus State of Haryana and otheRs.since common questions of facts and law are involved in all the writ petitions. The facts are being taken from CWP Nos.19704 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10112 of 2014 Date of Decision :11.7. 2014 Charanjot Singh ..Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondents ..CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ..Present : Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner..RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J (Oral) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this court by way of instant petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he finally approached the respondent authorities by way of his representation dated 12.02.2014 (Annexure P-7).but the same is also pending decision. He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied, in case respondent no.1 is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, within a reasona...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-15-2014
CWP No.537 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CM No.2622 of 2014 in/and CWP No.537 of 2014 Date of Decision : 15.7.2014 Pawan Kumar ......Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents ..CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ..Present : Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner..RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J CM No.2622 of 2014 Applicant seeks to place on record Annexure P-12-B i.e.the seniority list. Application is allowed as prayed for. Document Annexures P-12-B is permitted to be placed on record. C.M.stands disposed of. CWP No.537 of 2014 Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this court by way of instant petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he finally approached Sahni Gre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-17-2014
CWP No.1143 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1143 of 2013 (O&M) Reserved on:01.07.2014. Date of decision:17.07.2014 Sarabjit Kaur & others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr.G.S.Sirphikhi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Aman Bahri, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3. Mr.V.S.Kataria, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ***** G.S.Sandhawalia J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by 57 petitioners, who are seeking a direction that roll numbers/admit cards be issued to them and they be allowed to sit in the Auxiliary Nurses & Mid-wives Course (for short, the 'ANM course') theory examinations, commencing from January, 2013.2. In view of the fact that the writ petition came up for hearing on 21.01.2013, for the first time, interim orders were passed permitting the petitioners to appear in the examination which were commencing...
Tag this Judgment!