Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-06-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. h May, 2019 CS(COMM) 1169/2018 & I.As. 13934/2018, 15885/2018 EISAI CO. LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Archana Sanker, Mr.Dhruv Anand, Ms.Vidisha Garg, Ms.Udita Patro and Mr.Nischay Mall, Advocates for plaintiffs versus SATISH REDDY & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Ms.Sneha Jain, Mr.Devvrat Joshi, Mr.Amitavo Mitra and Ms.Garima Sawhney, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA I.A. 13934/2018 JUDGMENT1 The plaintiffs have instituted this suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling, distributing, exporting or offering for sale of any product that infringes the plaintiffs patent No.215528 including Lorcaserin or any of its pharmaceutically acceptable salts including Lorcaserin Hydrochloride (hereinafter referred to as LH) and Lorcaserin Hydrochloride Hemihydrate (hereinafter re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-06-2019
~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 851/2017 Reserved on:4. h August, 2018 Pronounced on:6. h May, 2019 PRAVESH DIXIT @ TINDA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI A. Negi, PS Dwarka South CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The appellant Pravesh Dixit @ Tinda stands convicted, vide judgment dated 23rd February, 2017, under Sections 367 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC) and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, having been found guilty of subjecting a child, 17 years and 4 months of age (who would be referred to, hereinafter, as X), to penetrative sexual assault. Consequent thereto, the appellant has, vide subsequent order dated 27th April, 2017, been sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI), for commission of the offence punishable under Section 4 of the POCS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-03-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.129 OF2017Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI) ..Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents JUDGMENT Arun Mishra, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) (hereinafter referred to as the Society) highlighting the issues and problems affecting the practice of obstetricians and gynaecologists across the country under the Preconception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 23(1) and 23(2) of the Act and seeking direction in the nature of certiorari/mandamus for decriminalising anomalies in paperwork/record keeping/clerical errors in regard of the provisions of the Act for being violative of 2 Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitut...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-03-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 02.2019 Pronounced on:03. 05.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 269/2018, CAV10742018 & C.M. APPL. 48680-48681/2018 DISPOSAFE HEALTH & LIFE CARE LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Versus HINDUSTAN SYRINGES & MEDICAL DEVICES LTD . .... Respondent FAO(OS) (COMM) 272/2018, CAV10792018 & C.M. Appl. 48934-48935/2018 DISPOSAFE HEALTH & LIFE LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Versus RAJIV NATH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Daswani, Mr. Soham Kumar, Mr. Aisvary Vikram and Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Advocates Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Ms. V. Mohini, Mr. Udayvir Rana, Advocate in FAO(OS) (Comm) 269/2018 & 272/2018 FAO (OS)(COMM) 269/2018 & 272/2018 Page 1 of 29 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This judgment will dispose of two appeals; FAO (OS) (Comm) 272/2018 is preferred by Disposafe Health & Lifeca...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-02-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:02. 05.2019 + W.P.(C) 6468/2012 NARESH KUMAR SHARMA & ANR Through None. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1. Dr.Harsh Mr.Siddharth Shukla, Adv. for R-3. Pathak, Adv. with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction as under:-"i. The respondents to formulate guidelines/rules/procedures for effective functioning, implementation and convening of the functions, duties and obligation of the respondent No.2; ii.... RESPONDENTS to provide requisite infrastructure for training, preparing, boarding and lodging facilities to the athletes representing India in international events; iii. Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 to submit the report of the action WP (C) 6468/2012 Page 1 of 9 taken against the erring officials of the Respondent No.2 for committing the overt a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-30-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3873 OF2010THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NEMI CHAND MAHELA AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENT(S) W I T H (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.4562 OF2012 CIVIL APPEAL No.4491 OF2019JUDGMENT Sanjiv Khanna, J.Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4562 of 2012.2. Predicament of candidates consequent to conflicting opinions in different decisions of the High Court on true and correct interpretation of principle of prospective overruling as directed in Kailash Chand Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.1 is the cause of this agonising and festering litigation since 1999. This scarecrow of a litigation, to use the words of Charles Dickens, in 1 (2002) 6 SCC562Civil Appeal No.3873 of 2010 & Anr. Page 1 of 15 course of time, [has]. become so complicated that no man alive knows what it means. 3. Award of bonus marks to candidates seeking appointment to the post of Primary Schoo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 743/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5412/2019 (stay) Decided on:30. h April, 2019 ANKUR NARANG ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Hitender Kapur, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Adv. with SI Yogender PS Paschim Vihar. Mr. Kamal Gupta, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.38/2019 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at PS Paschim Vihar on the complaint of respondent No.2.2. The three grounds taken by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR in question are; first is lack of territorial jurisdiction contending that no offence has taken place in Delhi and thus Police Station has no jurisdiction to investigate and the Trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the offence; secondly, that the FIR was not lodged within the period of limitation and thirdly that on the face of the FIR the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-29-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:3. d April, 2019 Pronounced on:29th April, 2019 CS (COMM) 313/2018 M/S PARIDHI UDYOG ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra, Adv. JAGDEV RAJ SARWAN RAM DHIMAN versus ..... Defendant Through: Ms. RajdipaBehura, Advocate with Mr. PhilomonKani and Ms. Kirti Handa, Advocates JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present suit concerns Plaintiff's intellectual property rights in its registered trademark AADHAR SHREE [label].. Case of the Plaintiff 2. Plaintiff, a partnership firm is the registered proprietor of the trademark AADHAR SHREE (Label) in Class 19. The firm is manufacturing and marketing Plaster of Paris and Plaster Sheets bearing Trademark AADHAR SHREE. Plaintiff adopted and conceived the said mark in the year 2005 and has been using the same since then. It is claimed by the... Petitioner that the goods bearing the afore-noted trade mark have acquired distinctiveness, substantial goodwill and reputation amongst the consumers bec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-25-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 04.2019 Pronounced on:25. 04.2019 LPA1842019 & CM APPL. No.12369/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS .... Appellants Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG with Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG, Mr.Ripu Daman Singh Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Hina Bhargava, Mr.N.K. Singh (Joint Secretary) & Ms. Veena Kumari, Director for Ministry of Mines. versus M/S RVG METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aman Vachher, Mr. Yashraj, Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Mr. Shyam Agarwal & Mr. Arun Nagar, Advs. LPA1852019 & CM APPL. Nos. 12384/2019 & 18118/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Appellants Acharya, Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG with Ms.Maninder ASG, Mr.Ripu Daman Singh Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Hina Bhargava, Mr.N.K. Singh (Joint Secretary) & Ms. Veena Kumari, Director for Ministry of Mines. versus M/S STANDARD METALLOYS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aman V...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-25-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 04.2019 Pronounced on:25. 04.2019 LPA1842019 & CM APPL. No.12369/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS .... Appellants Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG with Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG, Mr.Ripu Daman Singh Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Hina Bhargava, Mr.N.K. Singh (Joint Secretary) & Ms. Veena Kumari, Director for Ministry of Mines. versus M/S RVG METALS & ALLOYS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aman Vachher, Mr. Yashraj, Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Mr. Shyam Agarwal & Mr. Arun Nagar, Advs. LPA1852019 & CM APPL. Nos. 12384/2019 & 18118/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Appellants Acharya, Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG with Ms.Maninder ASG, Mr.Ripu Daman Singh Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Hina Bhargava, Mr.N.K. Singh (Joint Secretary) & Ms. Veena Kumari, Director for Ministry of Mines. versus M/S STANDARD METALLOYS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aman V...
Tag this Judgment!