Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-10-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2018 Pronounced on:10. 04.2019 + W.P.(C) 11467/2018, CM APPL. 44376-44378/2018 MAHINDRA ELECTRIC MOBILITY LIMITED AND ANR. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS versus versus TATA MOTORS LIMITED & ANR COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA versus MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. GENERAL MOTORS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS + W.P.(C) 6610/2014 + W.P.(C) 6634/2014, CM APPL. 20409/2014 + W.P.(C) 7087/2014, CM APPL. 16614/2014, CM APPL. 39827/2018 + W.P.(C) 7121/2014, CM APPL. 16680/2014, CM APPL. 31959/2018 + W.P.(C) 7186/2014, CM APPL. 16889/2014 + W.P.(C) 7306/2014, CM APPL. 17096/2014 + W.P.(C) 7321/2014, CM APPL. 17118/2014 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MERCEDES BENZ INDIA PVT LT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-10-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 10, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1924/2019 PANKAJ UPPAL & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naval Jha, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor with ASI Gian Chand. Mr. Lalit Yadav and Mr. Anil Thakur, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.7629/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1924/2019 Quashing of FIR No.76/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 20th July, 2018 (Annexure P-3). Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Gian Chand on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1924/2019 Page 1 of 3 R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2019
$~82 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6103/2018 & CM APPLN. 23703/2018 J.C. BAMFORD EXCAVATORS LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anil Dutt, Mr.Prashant Phillips, Mr.Sudarshan Shekhawat, Ms.Gunjan Hans and Ms.Godhuli Nanda, Advocates 1. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr.Kavindra Gill, Mr.Upendra Sai and Mr.Kamaldeep, Advocates for R-1 and R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the order dated 09th April, 2018 whereby Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs revoked patent No.251037 and imposed cost of Rs.10,000/- on the petitioner.2. The petitioner applied for grant of a patent in respect of an invention titled Excavating and Loading Machine on 11th May, 2015. The petitioners patent application was published under Section 11A of the Patents Act on 09th January, 2009 and patent No.25103...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 13, 2018 Judgment delivered on: April 05, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9864/2017, CM No.40141/2017 M/S STELLING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. (RAILYATRI.IN) AND ANR. Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioners Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Mr. Jiten Mehra, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Anand Daga, Ms. Gunjan Ahuja and Mr. Iqram Govind Singh, Advs. for R3. versus INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Adv. for IRCTC AND + W.P.(C) 8562/2017, CM No.35240/2017 MR. ANAND PUROHIT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Mr. Yuvraj Sharma and Ms. Sneh Suman, Advs. Versus INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Adv. for IRCTC. Mr. Arjun Garg and Mr. Manish Yadav, Advs. for R2. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Mr. Jiten Mehra, Ms. Van...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 353/2003 IN THE MATTER OF: Reserved on:13. 02.2019 Date of decision:05. 04.2019 JAGRAJ SINGH alias RAJAN BHAIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikram Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State. ..... Respondent STATE OF DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. A limited question that has come up for consideration in the present appeal, arising from Sessions Case No.185/2001, in FIR No.301/2000, PS Patel Nagar, is as to whether the conviction of the appellant vide impugned judgment dated 21.4.2003, under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 22.4.2003, sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three years, is liable to be upheld or he deserves to be held guilty for the commi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-04-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2173/2019 NEVIL VISHNUBHAI PATEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr T. Sundar Ramanathan, Mr Jay Shah and Ms Kumudavalli S., Advocates. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS versus Kaur Through: Mr T. Singhdev, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar and Ms Amandeep Ahuja, Advocates for R-1/MCI. Mr Praveen Khattar, Advocate for R-2/DMC with Mr L. D. S. Uppal, Assistant Secretary, DMC. Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for Mr Kirtiman Singh, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0404.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.15750/2019 1. This is an application filed by the petitioner for correctly reflecting his name as Nevil Vishnubhai Patel. The cause title is rectified to reflect the same.2. The application is disposed of. W.P. (C) 2173/2019 Page 1 of 6 CM No.10232/2019 3. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2173/2019 & CM No.10231/2019 4. Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h February, 2019 Decided on:4. h April, 2019 CRL.A. 990/2018 SHAMSHAD @ MURAPPAN & ORS. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Avinash Nandan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Shamshad @ Murappan, Akram and Shahrukh @ Sharup Khan challenge the impugned judgment dated 5th July, 2018 convicting them for the offence punishable under Sections 304 Part-II and 34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 7th July, 2018 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period six months for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II/34 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellants have been convicted on the statement of the sole eye- witn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-02-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.578 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.7857 of 2018) National Investigation Agency ..Appellant(s) :Versus: Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.M. K hanwilkar , J.1. Leave granted.2. The respondent is named as Accused No.10 in the First Information Report dated 30th May, 2017, registered by the Officerincharge of Police Station, NIA, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 121 and 121A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 13,16,17,18,20,38,39 and 40 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, (for short the 1967 Act). The respondent (Accused No.10) filed an application for bail before the District and Sessions Judge, 2 Special Court (NIA), New Delhi, which came to be rejected on 8th June, 2018. That order has been reversed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.768/2018 vide order dated 13th September, 2018. The High Court direc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-02-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.66 OF2018IN TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1399 OF2018DHARANI SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.339 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.802 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1086 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1110 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1124 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1142 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1138 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1156 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1153 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1166 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1206 OF20181 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1212 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1236 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1296 OF2018SLP(C) No.31421 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1316 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1308 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1359 OF2018TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.65 OF2018IN TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No.1404 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1363 OF20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Decided on:26. h March, 2019 DASHRATH LAL (DECEASED) THR. LRs LPA942016 .....Appellants Through: Mr.Kamal Mehta, Advocate. versus DVB (NOW BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.) & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R1. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the legal representatives (LRs) (Appellants 2 to4) of late JUDGMENT Shri Dashrath Lal (Appellant No.1) and three others (Appellants 5 to7) is directed against the order dated 17th November 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing WP(C) 4093 of 2000.2. The challenge in the writ petition was to an order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB), the predecessor-in-interest of the Respondent No.1 BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL) dismissing Appellant No.1 and three other employees (Appellants 5 to7) from service. The challenge was also to the order ...
Tag this Judgment!