Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-15-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"15.04.2019 + W.P.(C) 3901/2019 BAL KISHAN Through: Mr.Ajesh Luthra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr.N.K. Singh & Ms.Ankita Ahuja Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J (ORAL) C.M. No.17688/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3901/2019 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 03.01.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in OA No.1936/2013. The Tribunal has dismissed the said original application by the impugned order. The petitioner had preferred the said original application to assail the disciplinary action taken against him by the respondents on the premise that on the same charge, he had been proceeded in a criminal case wherein he had been acquitted. The acquittal of the petitioner had taken place on ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-11-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 463/2018 & I.A. No.15416/2018 Date of Decision :11. h April, 2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORUTY OF INDIA THROUGH: THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NHAI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.Ravi Shankar, Ms.Yamunah Nachiar, Ms.Bhanu Kapoor, Advs. versus REENGUS SIKAR EXPRESSWAY LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Prashant Pakhiddey, Ms.Lakshmi Dwivedi, Mr.Anubhav Ray, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as to the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 05.07.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the work of Four Laning of Reengus Sikar section from Km 298.075 near Madhopur Junction to Km 341.047 of NH-11 in O.M.P. (Comm.) No.463/2018 Page 1 the State of Rajasthan awarded ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-09-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3588 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(C) No.46 of 2019]. CARETEL INFOTECH LTD. .APPELLANT Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. .RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. 2. Leave granted. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (respondent No.1) floated an e-public tender on 4.12.2017 for setting up call centres for receiving, recording and replying to information enquiries and complaints from LPG customers of IOC/HPC/BPC. The appellant participated in the tender. Clause 20 of the tender reads as under:1. 20. Black List/Ban/Holiday List i. Bids received from parties who have been banned/blacklisted/put on holiday list or parties in respect of whom the action for blacklisting and holiday listing has been initiated by HPCL/any Government/Quasi Government Agencies or PSUs, shall not be considered for either evaluation or for award of work. Offer of Vendor who has not submitted declaration o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 13, 2018 Judgment delivered on: April 05, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9864/2017, CM No.40141/2017 M/S STELLING TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. (RAILYATRI.IN) AND ANR. Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioners Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Mr. Jiten Mehra, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Anand Daga, Ms. Gunjan Ahuja and Mr. Iqram Govind Singh, Advs. for R3. versus INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Adv. for IRCTC AND + W.P.(C) 8562/2017, CM No.35240/2017 MR. ANAND PUROHIT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Mr. Yuvraj Sharma and Ms. Sneh Suman, Advs. Versus INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Adv. for IRCTC. Mr. Arjun Garg and Mr. Manish Yadav, Advs. for R2. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hardeep Singh Anand, Mr. Jiten Mehra, Ms. Van...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 353/2003 IN THE MATTER OF: Reserved on:13. 02.2019 Date of decision:05. 04.2019 JAGRAJ SINGH alias RAJAN BHAIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikram Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State. ..... Respondent STATE OF DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. A limited question that has come up for consideration in the present appeal, arising from Sessions Case No.185/2001, in FIR No.301/2000, PS Patel Nagar, is as to whether the conviction of the appellant vide impugned judgment dated 21.4.2003, under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 22.4.2003, sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three years, is liable to be upheld or he deserves to be held guilty for the commi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h February, 2019 Decided on:4. h April, 2019 CRL.A. 990/2018 SHAMSHAD @ MURAPPAN & ORS. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Avinash Nandan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Shamshad @ Murappan, Akram and Shahrukh @ Sharup Khan challenge the impugned judgment dated 5th July, 2018 convicting them for the offence punishable under Sections 304 Part-II and 34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 7th July, 2018 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period six months for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II/34 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellants have been convicted on the statement of the sole eye- witn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Decided on:26. h March, 2019 DASHRATH LAL (DECEASED) THR. LRs LPA942016 .....Appellants Through: Mr.Kamal Mehta, Advocate. versus DVB (NOW BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.) & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar with Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R1. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the legal representatives (LRs) (Appellants 2 to4) of late JUDGMENT Shri Dashrath Lal (Appellant No.1) and three others (Appellants 5 to7) is directed against the order dated 17th November 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing WP(C) 4093 of 2000.2. The challenge in the writ petition was to an order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB), the predecessor-in-interest of the Respondent No.1 BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL) dismissing Appellant No.1 and three other employees (Appellants 5 to7) from service. The challenge was also to the order ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-26-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h March, 2019 CS(COMM) 10/2019 & IA No.259/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) SURYA FOOD AND AGRO LIMITED .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. N. Mahabir and Mr. P.C. Arya, Advs. OM TRADERS & ANR. Versus ...Defendants Through: Mr. Hemant Sharma, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit against the two defendants namely (i) Om Traders; and, (ii) Raja Udyog Private Limited (RUPL), for permanent injunction restraining selling, offering for sale any goods, advertising or promoting any product under the packaging, get up, trade dress of the defendants product BUTTER KRUNCH or any packaging, get up, trade dress which is similar to that of plaintiffs product BUTTER DELITE and likely to cause passing off and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 10th January, 2019, when though not finding any case of passing off to have been made out but observing that the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. 01.2019 Date of Decision :14. 03.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 128/2018 & I.A. No.3857/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Keshav Mohan, Mr.Rishi K.Awasthi and Ms.Ritu Arora, Advs. versus + PUNE SHOLAPUR ROAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Laik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Concession Agreement dated 30.09.2009 executed between the parties for the work of Design, Engineering, Construction, Development, Finance, Operation and Maintenance of 4 laning of Pune Solapur Section of NH 9 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-11-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 482/2003 IN THE MATTER OF: Reserved on:21. 1.2019 Date of decision:11. 3.2019 HIMMAT SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Pradeep Chowdhary and Mr. Vikrant Chowdhary, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State. SI Suresh Kumar, P.S. Inderpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The three appellants, who are related to each other, being brothers, have challenged the judgment dated 4.7.2003, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in case FIR No.33/2002 registered against them at P.S. Inderpuri under Section 3IPC whereunder appellant No.1, Himmat Singh @ Mangal has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and the appellant No.2, Rajesh and appellant No.3, Vinod have been convicted under Section 3IPC. The appellants are also aggrieved by the order on sentence dated 4.7.2003 whereunder they have been sentenced to undergo rigo...
Tag this Judgment!