Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-22-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 02.2019 Pronounced on:22. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 5022/2017 & CM APPLN. 21659/2017 ONYX THERAPEUTICS, INC. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Dutt and Ms. Gunjan Hans, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. J.Sai Deepak, Mr. Afzal B. Khan and Mr. Eashan Ghosh, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 The present petition is preferred for quashing the impugned orders dated 12.05.2017 and 11.04.2017 passed by the respondent No.2 and restore the order dated April 10, 2017. Consequently, enable the petitioner to cross- examine Dr. Surajit Sinha and Dr. Prachi Tiwari prior to a final hearing on merits in the Section 25(2), Patents Act proceeding initiated by the respondent No.3 against Patent No.255964. W.P.(C) 5022/2017 Page 1 of 28 2. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondent No.2 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.21072125 OF2011C.B.I. New Delhi .Appellant(s) VERSUS B.B. Agarwal & Ors. etc. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 18.04.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Crl.MC Nos.572230 of 2006 & Crl.MA No.9675 of 2006, Crl.MC No.74 of 2007 & Crl.MA Nos.23536 of 1 2007, Crl.MC No.80 of 2007 & Crl.MA Nos.25960 of 2007 and Crl.MC No.2376 of 2007 & Crl.MA Nos.834142 of 2007 whereby the High Court allowed the criminal petitions filed by the respondents herein under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) and quashed the criminal proceedings in CBI Case No.RC.4(A)/94CBI/BSC/DLI pending before the Special Judge, Tis Hazari, Delhi against the respondents herein.2. A few facts need mention hereinbelow to appreciate the short controversy involved in these appeals...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4763-4764 OF2013TAMIL NADU POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STERLITE INDUSTRIES (I) LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8773-8774 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9542-9543 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL No.5782 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1552-1554 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL No.23 OF2019CIVIL APPEAL No.1582 OF2019JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. The present appeals arise out of orders that have been passed by the National Green Tribunal [NGT]. dated 31.05.2013, 08.08.2013, 1 and 15.12.2018. The brief facts necessary to appreciate the controversy raised in the present case are as follows.2. The respondent, Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. / Vedanta Ltd., was operating a copper smelter plant at the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. (SIPCOT) Industrial Complex at Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu. On 01.08.1994, the respondent received a No-Objection Certificate [NOC]. from the Tamil Nadu Pollution C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h February, 2019. CS(COMM) 903/2018 & IA165862018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus AQUALITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh, Mr. Rohan Seth and Mr. Dhruv Grover, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 905/2016 & IA86062016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Mohd. Sazeed Rayeen and Mr. Somnath Dey, Advs. Versus ACTION SHOES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-13-2019
$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th February, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 362/2018 MANISHA STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State Mr. Tarun Goomber, Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.407/2015 was registered on 25.04.2015 by Police Station Safdurjung Enclave on the complaint of the petitioner, allegations having been made and the investigation taken up for offences allegedly committed under Sections 354/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The police, having concluded the investigation, submitted report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking trial of one Dr. Naval Bhatia on the accusations for offences punishable under Sections 354/354-A/506/509 IPC. Allegations had also been made by the petitioner agains...
Tag this Judgment!