Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 943/2015 Reserved on: March 07, 2018 Date of decision: March 22, 2018 SATYAPAL SINGH ...Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 1002/2015 And KUNWAR NEERAJ STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, ...Appellant Advocate versus Through: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for... RESPONDENTthe State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT2203.2018 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 27th April 2015 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01 (New Delhi District), Patiala House Courts in Sessions Case No.127 of 2013 arising out of FIR No.17 of 2013 registered at Police Station (PS) Sagarpur convicting the Appellants, Kunwar Neeraj (A-1) and Satyapal Singh (A-4), for the Crl.A. 943/2015 & 1002/2015 Page 1 of 30 offences Section 302 Indian Penal C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 943/2015 Reserved on: March 07, 2018 Date of decision: March 22, 2018 SATYAPAL SINGH ...Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 1002/2015 And KUNWAR NEERAJ STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, ...Appellant Advocate versus Through: Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for... RESPONDENTthe State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT2203.2018 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 27th April 2015 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01 (New Delhi District), Patiala House Courts in Sessions Case No.127 of 2013 arising out of FIR No.17 of 2013 registered at Police Station (PS) Sagarpur convicting the Appellants, Kunwar Neeraj (A-1) and Satyapal Singh (A-4), for the Crl.A. 943/2015 & 1002/2015 Page 1 of 30 offences Section 302 Indian Penal C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2018
..... in front of bangla saheb gurudwara, baba kharag singh marg, new delhi.3. the prosecution has based its case against the two appellants on two eye-witnesses, i.e. siddharth @ nepali (pw-5) and rajesh @ rajwa (pw-6), and on kuldeep (pw-14) to whom both the appellants purportedly made an extra-judicial confession.4. constable raj yadav (pw-11) received ..... to the rml hospital. the mlc (ex.pw-12/a) revealed that the deceased had been brought there at around 11.15 pm on 20th december 2011 by siddharth @ chotu nepali. it was noted that he was brought dead. the mlc itself noted that there were two contused wounds over the temporo-occipital scalp, there was bleeding from both ears and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2018
..... in front of bangla saheb gurudwara, baba kharag singh marg, new delhi.3. the prosecution has based its case against the two appellants on two eye-witnesses, i.e. siddharth @ nepali (pw-5) and rajesh @ rajwa (pw-6), and on kuldeep (pw-14) to whom both the appellants purportedly made an extra-judicial confession.4. constable raj yadav (pw-11) received ..... to the rml hospital. the mlc (ex.pw-12/a) revealed that the deceased had been brought there at around 11.15 pm on 20th december 2011 by siddharth @ chotu nepali. it was noted that he was brought dead. the mlc itself noted that there were two contused wounds over the temporo-occipital scalp, there was bleeding from both ears and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5 * + W.P.(C) 974/2018 with CM Nos.4142-4143/2018 ASHISH KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Surya Nath Pandey, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for UOI with Ms.Anumita Chandra, Advocate with Lt.Col.(Dr.) Ashok Kumar, Cl. Spl. (Ophthal) & VR Surgean Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Mr.Devik Singh & Mr.Akash Mohapatra, Advocates for R-2 & R-3/UPSC CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER2003.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by his non selection in the National % 1. Defence Academy and Naval Academy Examination (1) -2017 for NDA-139 Course and has prayed for issuance of a writ/directions to the respondents to constitute a Review Medial Board to re-examine him. W.P.(C) 974/2018 Page 1 of 4 2. The brief facts of the case are that in January, 2017, the respondent No.2/UPSC had published an Examination Notice for conducting examinations for admission to the Army, Na...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~6 * + W.P.(C) 977/2018 & CM No.4144/2018 (Stay) DAKSH BASSI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Surya Nath Pandey, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Anumita Chandra, Advocate with Lt.Col. Ravikanth & Swg. Cdr. S.N.Singh, Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Mr.Devik Singh & Mr.Akash Mohapatra, Advocates for R-2 & R-3/UPSC. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER2003.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by his non-selection by the % 1. respondents in the National Defence Academy and Naval Academy Examination (1)-2017 for NDA-139 Course and has prayed for issuance of a writ/direction to the respondents to constitute a Review Medial Board to re-examine him.2. The brief facts of the case are that in January, 2017, the respondent No.2/UPSC had published an Examination Notice for W.P.(C) 977/2018 Page 1 of 4 conducting examinations for admission to the Army, Navy and Air Fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2018
$~10. * + % W.P.(CRL) 513/2018 BALDEV SINGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 03.2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Advocate versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE & ORS Through: Mr. Satish ..... Respondent with Aggarwal, Ms.Gitanjali Kumar, Adv for DRI Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Ms. Shakshi Aggarwal, G.P., Mr. Shyam Sundar Rai, Mr. Deepak Goyal, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. TEJI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek a declaration that Section 32A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) is ultravires to the extent it prevents the W.P.(CRL) 513/2018 Page 1 of 17 convicts under the said Act from getting remission under the Delhi Jail Manual.2. The petitioner is a convict under the NDPS Act. He stands convicte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-19-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.318 OF2006National Campaign Committee for Central Legislation on Construction Labour (NCC-CL) .....Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ....Respondents CONMT. PET. (C) No.52/2013 in W.P. (C) No.318/2006 WITH JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Symbolic justice there is nothing more to offer to several millions of construction workers in the unorganized sector not social justice, not economic justice. The reason is quite simple. No State Government and no Union Territory Administration (UTA) seems willing to fully adhere to and abide by (or is perhaps even capable of fully adhering to and abiding by) two W.P. (C) No.318 of 2006 etc. Page 1 of 57 laws solemnly enacted by Parliament, namely, the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 (the BOCW Act) and the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 (the Cess Act). ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-19-2018
$~R-117 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 793/2017 DEEPAK KASHYAP ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kaveeta Wadia and Mr.Shashank Tripathi, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1903.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20th May 2017, passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS-2 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts in Sessions Case No.111/2012 arising out of FIR. No.208/2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Burari convicting the Appellant for the offences under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Ms. Radha (the deceased) and for the offence under Section 323 IPC for causing injury on Smt. Janki Devi (PW-5) who was trying to save her daughter Radha.2. The appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 22nd May 2017, whereby for the offence under Section 302 IPC the Appellant was Crl.A.793/2017 Page 1 of 16 sentenced to impri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-16-2018
..... west bengal in a press conference stated that bengali would be compulsory in all schools in west bengal. the gorkhas viewed this as an encroachment on their language, i.e. nepali/gorkhali. a facebook post dated 16.05.2017 made by the chief minister of west bengal has also been referred to, which mentions that one of the three languages would .....
Tag this Judgment!