Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-12-2018
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1843 of 2018 (@ Diary No.36081 of 2017) COMMODORE P.K. BANERJEE .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Leave to appeal granted.2) This appeal is preferred by Commodore P.K. Banerjee under Section 32 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) questioning the correctness and legality of the judgment and order dated September 14, 2017 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (for short AFT) in O.A. No.392 of 2014 and order dated December 10, 2017 in M.A. No.1219 of 2017 filed in O.A. No.392 of 2014 passed by the AFT.3) Vide Order dated September 14, 2017, the AFT has dismissed the O.A. No.392 of 2014 which was instituted by the appellant questioning the 2 gradings given to him in Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) of some of the years recorded by his superiors which, according to him, had adversely affected his career...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-08-2018
* + + + + + + + + % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (COMM) No.772/2016 CS(COMM) No.570/2017 CS(COMM) No.571/2017 CS(COMM) No.780/2017 CS(OS) No.2850/2014 CS(OS) No.64/2016 CS (COMM) No.52/2018 CS (COMM) No.53/2018 8th February, 2018 CS (COMM) No.772/2016 M/s CROCS INC.USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Shukla, Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Ms. Tanvi Mishra Advocates. versus M/s LIBERTY SHOES LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Devyani Nath, Mr. Shubhankar, Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advocates for D-1. + CS(COMM) No.570/2017 M/s CROCS INC. USA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Giri, Mr. Vinay Shukla, Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Ms. Tanvi Mishra Advocates. CS (COMM) No.772/2016 and connected cases Page 1 of 54 versus M/s RELAXO FOOTWEAR LTD. Through: None. ..... Defendant + CS(COMM) No.571/2017 M/s CROCS INC. USA ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-08-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 222/2002 BIJENDER STATE Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % ORDER0802.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal directed against a judgment dated 1st September 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.15/1999 arising out of FIR No.982/1998 registered at Police Station (PS) Rajouri Garden convicting the Appellant of the offence under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife, Kanta. The appeal also impugns the order on sentence dated 3rd September, 2002 whereby he was sentenced to imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs.2,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months. Case of the prosecution 2. At around 10.25 am in the morning of 1st November 1998, information was received in t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-07-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No.32138 OF2015The Goa Foundation M/s Sesa Sterlite Ltd. & Ors. Versus WITH Petitioner Respondents SLP (C) NOS. 32699-32727 OF2015 WRIT PETITION (C) No.711 OF2015AND WRIT PETITION (C) No.720 OF2015JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J1 Rapacious and rampant exploitation of our natural resources is the hallmark of our iron ore mining sector - coupled with a total lack of concern for the environment and the health and well-being of the denizens in the vicinity of the mines. The sole motive of mining lease holders seems to be to make profits (no matter how) and the attitude seems to be that if the rule of law is required to be put on the backburner, so be it. Unfortunately, the S.L.P. (C) No.32138 of 2015 etc. Page 1 of 101 State is unable to firmly stop violations of the law and other illegalities, perhaps with a view to maximize revenue, but without appreciating the long term impact of this indiff...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-06-2018
$~ * R-67 + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 835/2014 MANOJ @ LEKHRAJ Date of Decision:6. h February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP with Insp. Raj Kumar, I.O. ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 19th April 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.38 of 2013 arising out of FIR No.262 of 2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Mangol Puri convicting the Appellant, Manoj @ Lekhraj, for the offence under Section 120B read with Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 28th April 2014 whereby for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life and a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs and in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-02-2018
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:2. d February, 2018 W.P.(C) 10870/2017 and CMNo.44503/2017 SKY LIGHT HOSPITALITY LLP ........ Petitioner Through Mr. C. S. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gautam Jain, Mr. Madhur Aggarwal and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advs. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -28(1), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Sr. Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Sky Light Hospitality LLP, a limited liability partnership, who had on 13.05.2016 taken over and acquired rights and liabilities of M/s Sky Light Hospitality Private Limited upon conversion under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, has filed the present writ petition impugning notice dated 30.03.2017 for the assessment year 2010-11 under Sectionof the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act for short).2.... Petitioner also impugns the order dated 09.11.2017 passed by the Assessing Offic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-02-2018
$~1 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :2. d February, 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 821/2017, CRL. M. B. 2207/2017, CRL. M. A. 17715-17716/2017 + HARISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Adv. with Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Adv. versus STATE Through : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 922/2017, CRL. M. B. 2195/2017, CRL. M. A. 20329/2017 VEERPAL ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Naomi Chandra, Adv. versus STATE Through : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present revision petitions have been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of the judgment dated 01.05.2017 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.18/2016, whereby the findings of conviction recorded by the learned Trial Court were endorsed. By a judgment dated 28.01.2016, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate had found both the petitioners CRL. REV. PET. 821/2017 & 922/2017 Page 1 o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-02-2018
$~1 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :2. d February, 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 821/2017, CRL. M. B. 2207/2017, CRL. M. A. 17715-17716/2017 + HARISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Adv. with Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Adv. versus STATE Through : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 922/2017, CRL. M. B. 2195/2017, CRL. M. A. 20329/2017 VEERPAL ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Naomi Chandra, Adv. versus STATE Through : Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present revision petitions have been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of the judgment dated 01.05.2017 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.18/2016, whereby the findings of conviction recorded by the learned Trial Court were endorsed. By a judgment dated 28.01.2016, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate had found both the petitioners CRL. REV. PET. 821/2017 & 922/2017 Page 1 o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-01-2018
$~ * 12 + 13 + 14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2002 KISHAN LAL Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 215/2002 KALU @ VIJAY PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 604/2003 RAJENDER @ RAJU @ GANJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Aman Crl A Nos. 89 and 215 of 2002 and 604 of 2003 page 1 of 14 Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT0102.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th January 200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-01-2018
$~ * 12 + 13 + 14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2002 KISHAN LAL Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 215/2002 KALU @ VIJAY PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 604/2003 RAJENDER @ RAJU @ GANJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Aman Crl A Nos. 89 and 215 of 2002 and 604 of 2003 page 1 of 14 Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT0102.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th January 200...
Tag this Judgment!