Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2018
$ ~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: December 16th, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 19th, 2018 + CRL.A. No.254/2014 VIVEKANAND BIHARI .... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Deepak Anand and Mr. Aayushmaan Vatsayana, Advs. Versus Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for ......Respondent State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. (JUDGMENT) The appellant Vivekanand Bihari seeks, by means of the present appeal, to challenge the judgment, dated 25th September 2013, and the consequent order, dated 26th September 2013, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), whereby the appellant has been found guilty of having committed the murder of Prabhash, and of having thrown his dead body in the ganda nala (drain), thereby committing offences Crl Appeal 254/2014 Page 1 of 90 punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.922/2004 16th February, 2018 + % METRO EXPORTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Jayakar, Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Shete, Advocate, Mr. Javaid Muzaffar, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Advocate and Mr. Bharat Bagla, Advocate. Through: Mr. Mohan M. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Defendant versus Through: Ms. Sunita Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit being CS(OS) No.922/2004 is filed by the plaintiff Metro Exporters Pvt. Ltd. The sole defendant in the suit is United India Insurance Co. Ltd. By the suit plaintiff seeks a money decree for a total amount of Rs.79,38,613.02/-, i.e principal amount of Rs.76,70,056/- with interest at 18%. The present suit was originally filed in the Mumbai High Court but was thereafter transferred to this Court in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated 23.1.2004 in CS(OS) No.922/2004 a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.922/2004 16th February, 2018 + % METRO EXPORTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Jayakar, Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Shete, Advocate, Mr. Javaid Muzaffar, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Advocate and Mr. Bharat Bagla, Advocate. Through: Mr. Mohan M. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Defendant versus Through: Ms. Sunita Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit being CS(OS) No.922/2004 is filed by the plaintiff Metro Exporters Pvt. Ltd. The sole defendant in the suit is United India Insurance Co. Ltd. By the suit plaintiff seeks a money decree for a total amount of Rs.79,38,613.02/-, i.e principal amount of Rs.76,70,056/- with interest at 18%. The present suit was originally filed in the Mumbai High Court but was thereafter transferred to this Court in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated 23.1.2004 in CS(OS) No.922/2004 a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.922/2004 16th February, 2018 + % METRO EXPORTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Jayakar, Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Shete, Advocate, Mr. Javaid Muzaffar, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Advocate and Mr. Bharat Bagla, Advocate. Through: Mr. Mohan M. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Defendant versus Through: Ms. Sunita Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit being CS(OS) No.922/2004 is filed by the plaintiff Metro Exporters Pvt. Ltd. The sole defendant in the suit is United India Insurance Co. Ltd. By the suit plaintiff seeks a money decree for a total amount of Rs.79,38,613.02/-, i.e principal amount of Rs.76,70,056/- with interest at 18%. The present suit was originally filed in the Mumbai High Court but was thereafter transferred to this Court in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated 23.1.2004 in CS(OS) No.922/2004 a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Feb-16-2018
CRL.A.No.100167/2014 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018 PRESENT THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100167/2014 ... APPELLANT BETWEEN: MEERSAB S/O DAWALSAB JAKATI AGE:57. YEARS, OCC: KSRTC CLERK R/O. H. No.LIG21 URDU COLONY, AKHOL ROAD, NEAR COURT, NIPPANI DIST: BELAGAVI (BY SRI. NITIN R. BOLABANDI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. MOHAMMADSHIRAJ, S/O BABU KILLEDAR AGE:31. YEARS, OCC: MILITARY SERVICE R/O. GODHGERI, TQ: HUKKERI DIST: BELAGAVI. SMT.BIBIJAN W/O. BABU KILLEDAR AGE:51. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE R/O. GODHGERI, TQ: HUKKERI DIST: BELAGAVI. APPASAB S/O. BABU KILLEDAR AGE:38. YEARS, OCC: NIL R/O. GODHGERI, TQ: HUKKERI DIST: BELAGAVI.2. 3.4.5. CRL.A.No.100167/2014 2 SMT.RESHMA W/O. APPASAB KILLEDAR AGE:27. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE R/O. GODHGERI, TQ: HUKKERI DIST: BELAGAVI. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP: BY ITS HIGH COURT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH. (THROUGH ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-16-2018
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3101-3102 OF2015EX. LT. COL. R.K. RAI APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.These two appeals have been filed by the appellant challenging the orders dated 20.09.2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal Regional Bench at Mumbai rejecting Petitioners O.A. No.25 of 2013 and the order dated 11.06.2014 rejecting the Review Application No.4 of 2014. The brief facts of the case are: The appellant was commissioned in the Regiment of Artillery on 24.12.1982. In the year 1987, while 2 performing the duty of Observation Post Officer, the appellant fell ill, who was treated in Military Hospital, Devlali. Medical Board was held on 21.01.1988, when he was placed on low medical category. Medical Board opined that disability was due to stress and strain of services. On 27.09.2000, the Medical Re-categorization Board assessed the appellants disability as 50%. In the year 200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-16-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.129 OF2018Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI The petitioner, a registered society, has preferred this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking appropriate directions for prohibiting the respondent Nos. 4 to 7 from releasing/screening/publishing feature film, namely, Aiyaary with direct or indirect references to the petitioner society's land/building/membership, for such an action is bound to affect the Right to Life under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. It is also prayed that the said respondents should be commanded to delete all those parts in the ensuing feature film which has direct or indirect references to the society in question. 2 2. It is contended by Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, that the film, which is going to be released, has projec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.922/2004 16th February, 2018 + % METRO EXPORTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Jayakar, Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Shete, Advocate, Mr. Javaid Muzaffar, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Advocate and Mr. Bharat Bagla, Advocate. Through: Mr. Mohan M. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Defendant versus Through: Ms. Sunita Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit being CS(OS) No.922/2004 is filed by the plaintiff Metro Exporters Pvt. Ltd. The sole defendant in the suit is United India Insurance Co. Ltd. By the suit plaintiff seeks a money decree for a total amount of Rs.79,38,613.02/-, i.e principal amount of Rs.76,70,056/- with interest at 18%. The present suit was originally filed in the Mumbai High Court but was thereafter transferred to this Court in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated 23.1.2004 in CS(OS) No.922/2004 a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SPHAERA PHARMA, PTE. LTD AND ANR. Through Mr Rajeshwari M., Advocate. ........ Petitioners $~41 * + W.P.(C) 1469/2018 versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Mr Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr Akshaya Agarwal, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1602.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to respondent No.2 to restore the Indian Patent Application No.3584/DELNP/2015 for examination on merits. The said application has been treated as abandoned as the petitioners had failed and neglected to file the request for examination within the prescribed time.2. The petitioners claim that they are fully integrated drug discovery and development companies and have developed several new compounds useful in treatment of cancer. In order to consolidate its rights in respect of such compounds, the petitioner no.1 (hereafter the petitioner) filed an ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-13-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1162/2017 & CRL.M (B) 2231/2017 NAVAL KISHORE @ BOBBY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Parameshwar, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Ahirao, Advocate. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % ORDER1302.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 12th September, 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts in Sessions Case No.23/2017 arising out FIR No.514/2016 registered at Police Station (PS) Bhalaswa Dairy under Section 302 IPC convicting the Appellant for the said offence and the order on sentence dated 19th September, 2017 sentencing the Appellant to rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. Case of the prosecution 2. The case began with a call being received at the Police Control Ro...
Tag this Judgment!