Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-06-2018
$~ * R-67 + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 835/2014 MANOJ @ LEKHRAJ Date of Decision:6. h February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR STATE Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP with Insp. Raj Kumar, I.O. ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 19th April 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II (North-West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.38 of 2013 arising out of FIR No.262 of 2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Mangol Puri convicting the Appellant, Manoj @ Lekhraj, for the offence under Section 120B read with Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 28th April 2014 whereby for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life and a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs and in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-01-2018
$~ * 12 + 13 + 14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2002 KISHAN LAL Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 215/2002 KALU @ VIJAY PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 604/2003 RAJENDER @ RAJU @ GANJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Aman Crl A Nos. 89 and 215 of 2002 and 604 of 2003 page 1 of 14 Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT0102.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th January 200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-01-2018
$~ * 12 + 13 + 14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2002 KISHAN LAL Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 215/2002 KALU @ VIJAY PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 604/2003 RAJENDER @ RAJU @ GANJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Aman Crl A Nos. 89 and 215 of 2002 and 604 of 2003 page 1 of 14 Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT0102.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th January 200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-01-2018
$~ * 12 + 13 + 14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 89/2002 KISHAN LAL Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent With CRL.A. 215/2002 KALU @ VIJAY PAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Verma, Ms. Vaishali Soni, Mr. Honey Khanna, and Ms. Sanya Sud, Advocates. STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent CRL.A. 604/2003 RAJENDER @ RAJU @ GANJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr. Aman Crl A Nos. 89 and 215 of 2002 and 604 of 2003 page 1 of 14 Chaudhary, Advocates. versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP ..... Respondent JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT0102.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th January 200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-29-2018
$~ * + STATE + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.434/2000 Reserved on: January 5, 2018 Decided on: January 29, 2018 DILBAGH SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vikas Walia, Mr.Sumit Misra, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A.463/2000 PRATEEK Through: Mr. Mohd. Shahrukh Hussain, ..... Appellant STATE Advocate Versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 7th July 2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Delhi in Crl.A. 434/2000 & Crl.A. 463/2000 Page 1 of 28 Sessions Case No.103 of 1998 arising out of FIR No.71 of 1998 registered at Police Station (PS) Nangloi convicting the Appellants for the offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 8th July 2000 of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-29-2018
$~ * + STATE + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.434/2000 Reserved on: January 5, 2018 Decided on: January 29, 2018 DILBAGH SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vikas Walia, Mr.Sumit Misra, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A.463/2000 PRATEEK Through: Mr. Mohd. Shahrukh Hussain, ..... Appellant STATE Advocate Versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 7th July 2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Delhi in Crl.A. 434/2000 & Crl.A. 463/2000 Page 1 of 28 Sessions Case No.103 of 1998 arising out of FIR No.71 of 1998 registered at Police Station (PS) Nangloi convicting the Appellants for the offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 8th July 2000 of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-18-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:08. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:18. h January, 2018 ARB.P. 684/2017 INDERJIT BADHWAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Jagdish Sagar, Advocate. versus M/S TARA PRESS & INDIA RESEARCH PRESS ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.L.Mahajan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 11 (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. Undisputedly, the petitioner and respondent had entered into a publishing agreement dated 23.11.2001 whereby the petitioner assigned certain rights in respect of the literary work written by the petitioner. The copy of the publishing agreement is annexed with the petition and clause No.26 thereof notes as under:-"the case of any disputes or 26. In the parties differences arising between hereto relating to this Agreement or any matter arising incidental th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAT.APP.(F.C.) 92/2017 and CM APPL. 19737/2017 Reserved on:12. 10.2017 Date of decision:12. 01.2018 IN THE MATTER OF: ABHIMANYU PORIA * + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Mr.Yash Prakash, Mr. Hrishikesh Jha and Mr. Abhay Narula, Advocates RAJBIR SINGH AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jinendra Jain, Ms. Noopur Dubey, Ms. Aishwarya Laxmi and Mr. Chirag, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA HIMA KOHLI, J.1. In this appeal, the appellant/father has challenged an order dated 29.04.2017 passed by the learned Family Court, North, Rohini, Delhi, disposing of an application moved by him under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1890), seeking the interim custody of his minor daughter, Baby Smridi Singh, aged 7 years and 9 months, as on date and arrayed as respon...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h November, 2017, Date of decision:8. h January, 2018 + OMP3912015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Gunjan S. Jain, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus MAPEX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun K. Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Chandwani, Mr.Ashish Joshi and Mr. Sameer Chandwani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.For detailed order, kindly refer to the judgment delivered today in OMP No.384/2015 titled Mapex Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Highways Authority of India. JANUARY8 2018 RN/rv NAVIN CHAWLA, J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP3842015 Reserved on:7. h November, 2017, Date of decision:8. h January, 2018 MAPEX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun K. Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Chandwani, Mr.Ashish Joshi and Mr. Sameer Chandwani, Advocates versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Gu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP3842015 Reserved on:7. h November, 2017, Date of decision:8. h January, 2018 MAPEX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun K. Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Chandwani, Mr.Ashish Joshi and Mr. Sameer Chandwani, Advocates versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Gunjan S. Jain, Advocate ..... Respondent + OMP3912015 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Ms. Gunjan S. Jain, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus MAPEX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun K. Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Chandwani, Mr.Ashish Joshi and Mr. Sameer Chandwani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA OMP Nos.384 & 391/2015 Page 1 1. The above petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the award dated 17th March, 2015 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Arbitrators.2. MAPEX ...
Tag this Judgment!