Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-12-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h March, 2018 Pronounced on:12. h April, 2018 CS(COMM) 712/2018 VIOR(INTERNATIONAL) LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through : Ms.Vaishali Mittal and Ms.Vrinda Gambhir, Advocates. versus MAXYCON HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through : None being ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed this suit for restraining the defendants from infringement of Indian Patent No.221536; infringement of copyright in the literary work; dilution & tarnishment of brand image of the plaintiffs; malicious falsehood; delivery up; rendition of accounts; damages etc against the defendants.2. At the outset, it is to be noted during pendency of the suit, vide order dated 22.12.2015 the suit against defendant No.1 was not pressed and the none appeared on behalf of the defendant No.2 despite service. The proceedings were treated as ex parte against sole remaining defendant. Subseq...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-11-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:11. 04.2018 RC.REV. 74/2017 and CM No.6184/2017(stay) SUNDER SINGH TALWAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Brij Bhushan Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocate Versus KAMAL CHAND DUGAR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Jain, and Mr.Manu Jain, Mr.Sachin Mr.Ankit Mr.Sarvesh Rai Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the eviction order and judgment dated 09.08.2016 passed by the court of Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC). By the impugned order, the ARC dismissed the application for leave to defend under Section 25B of the DRC Act and passed an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. The respondent/landlord filed the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-10-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3020 OF2018THE ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S.N. RAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.2995 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.2994 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.2996 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.2997 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2998-3014 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2954-2989 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.3015 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.3016 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3018-3019 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.2990 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.3017 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.2991 OF2018Civil Appeal No.3020 of 2018 & Ors. Page 1 of 18 CIVIL APPEAL No.2992 OF2018A N D CIVIL APPEAL No.2993 OF2018JUDGMENT A.K.SIKRI, J.Appellant No.1, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, is a public sector undertaking incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. Appellant Nos. 2 and 3 are its office bearers. The main object of the appellant-Corporation is to develop industria...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-07-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1195/2015 Date of Decision:-"7th April, 2018 MOBIN @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP ..... Respondent SI Kawaljeet Singh, PS Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C. HARI SHANKAR, J1 The impugned judgment, dated 11th August, 2015, convicts the appellant, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC), for committing the murder of Akash, and sentences him to imprisonment for life, along with fine of 5,000/-, with six months simple imprisonment default sentence. It also extends, to the appellant, the benefit under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Cr.P.C).2. The case of the prosecution, as contained in the charge sheet, Crl Appeal 1195 of 2015 Page 1 of 67 dated 27th March, 2014, submitted by the prosecution to the Court o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 434/2002 PASHUPATI NATH SHAH (Deceased by LR) Through: Mr. D.K.Mathur, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State ..... Respondent $~5 * + STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER0404.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 2nd March 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.175/1996 arising from FIR No.107/1995, registered at Police Station (PS) Dabri, convicting the Appellant for the offences under Sections 376 and 302 IPC. The appeal is also against the order on sentence dated 10th April 2002 whereby for the offence under Section 376 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for one month; and for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-04-2018
$~13 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5902/2012 & CM APPL. 12151/2012 % Date of decision :4. h April, 2018 JAGJIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. K.C. Mittal, Mr. Amit Prakash and Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Shahi and Mr. Harsh Pandit, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Jagjit Singh, Ms. Preet Singh and Mr. Narayan Dev Parashar, Advs. for Railways. Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander and Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advs. for FSSAI/R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This petition was filed by the writ petitioner on 11th September, 2012 seeking the following prayers : W.P.(C)No.5902/2012 Page 1 of 9 2. a. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to immediately issue notifications in compliance of Section 30, 36, 37, 43, 44, 45, 68, 70 & 90 of FSS Act 2006 for...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 2 + ASHOK KUMAR @ JHABRU CRL.A. 305/2002 ...Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal with Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State... RESPONDENTSTATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER0204.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 2nd January 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.24/1998 arising out of FIR No.298/1997 registered at Police Station (PS) Chanakya Puri, convicting the Appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence of the same date sentencing him to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. The charge against the Appellant was that at around 12.45 pm on 28th September 1997, near Service Road, Bapu Dham Telephone Depot, Jhuggi, Indira Camp, the Appellant murdered the dece...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-28-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)8293 OF2018[Arising out of D. No.15103/2017]. Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis . Petitioner Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice .Respondents Vs. S.A.BOBDE & L.NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.ORDER1 Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated on 30.1.1948; about 70 years ago. 9 accused were tried for the conspiracy and murder of Gandhiji. After trial the judgment was delivered by Learned Special Judge, Delhi on 10.02.1949 convicting seven accused and acquitting one. Accused Nathuram Godse and Narayan Apte were given death sentence, four of the accused were given life sentence and remaining one was given a sentence of seven years of Imprisonment. The conviction was challenged in Punjab High Court in Appeal, High Court vide judgment dated 21.06.1949 upheld the conviction for five of the accused persons and acquitted two of the accused persons. None of the accused are alive today.2. The petitioner who describes...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-28-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.470 OF2018(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.)NO.9393 OF2017 KRISHNAKANT TAMRAKAR APPELLANT THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VERSUS ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. Leave granted. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 3rd May, 2017 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in CRA No.1823 of 2009 whereby prayer for bail, pending disposal of criminal appeal against life sentence has been declined though the appellant has been in custody for more than ten years.2. The appellant stands convicted under Sections 148, 302/149 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, apart from other sentences. According to the prosecution, on 23rd June, 2005 at 11.30 A.M., the appellant along with the co-accused caused the murder of one Shahid. In view of evidence in support of the 1 charge, the trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellant. The appellant applied for bail pending conside...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12th March, 2018 Decided on:23. d March, 2018 CRL.A. 245/2017 ... Appellant Through: Mr.Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State ....Respondent + INNOCENT NWAYO THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR versus JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 The Appellant, a Nigerian national, is challenging the impugned judgment dated 23rd July, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, West District, Delhi (ASJ) in SC No.40/3/14 arising out of FIR No.236/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Uttam Nagar convicting him for the offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence of the same date whereby he, for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC was sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.10,000/-; and in default of payment of fine to undergo six months simple i...
Tag this Judgment!