Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Sorted by: recent Year: 2015 Page 51 of about 504 results (0.004 seconds)

Jan 07 2015 (HC)

The Management of National Aerospace Laboratories Vs. Engineering & Ge ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2015

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7h DAY OF JANUARY2015R PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL.R.B. W.P. No.9974/2006 (L-TER) BETWEEN: The Management of National Aerospace Laboratories, Kodihalli Campus, BANGALORE 560 017 by its Director. (By Sri S.N.Murthy, Sr.counsel a/w Sri G.Lakshmeesh Rao, Adv.) AND :1. Engineering & General Workers Union, No.2, Mill Corner, Sampige Road, Malleshwaram, BANGALORE 560 003 by its Secretary.2. The Managing Director ...PETITIONER M/s. NALTECH Pvt. Ltd. T.S.Building, Kodihalli, BANGALORE 560 017 (By Sri V.R.Datar a/w Sri K.B.Narayana Swamy, Advs. for M/s. M.C.Narasimhan Associates, Advs. for caveator/R-1; Sri Ramchandran, Adv. for M.R.C.Ravi, Adv. for R-2) ...RESPONDENTS - 2 - This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the award dated 30.12.2005 passed by the Court of Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in Industrial Disp...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2015 (HC)

the Fertiliser Association of India Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 4898/2013 & CM No.11109/2013 THE FERTILISER ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Kaveta Wadia & Mr Shashank Tripathi. For the Respondents : Mr Saqib. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is an association of fertilizer manufacturers/importers and has filed the present petition impugning:1. 1 Clauses 5 & 6 of the Office Memorandum (hereafter OM) dated 03.05.2013 (hereafter OM-1) whereby the fertilizer manufacturers/importers were directed to reduce the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of other grades of Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers to the extent of the amount mentioned in the OM-1. The fertilizer manufacturers/importers were further warned that action would be taken against the entities who did not comply with the pric...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2015 (HC)

the Fertiliser Association of India Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 4898/2013 & CM No.11109/2013 THE FERTILISER ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Kaveta Wadia & Mr Shashank Tripathi. For the Respondents : Mr Saqib. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is an association of fertilizer manufacturers/importers and has filed the present petition impugning:1. 1 Clauses 5 & 6 of the Office Memorandum (hereafter OM) dated 03.05.2013 (hereafter OM-1) whereby the fertilizer manufacturers/importers were directed to reduce the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of other grades of Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers to the extent of the amount mentioned in the OM-1. The fertilizer manufacturers/importers were further warned that action would be taken against the entities who did not comply with the pric...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (SC)

Union of India and Anr. Vs. Purushottam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7133 OF2008UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ......APPELLANTS Versus PURUSHOTTAM .....RESPONDENT JUDGMENT VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J.1 The Respondent herein, No.7773409X Havildar (Military Police) Purushottam, was enrolled in the Corps of Military Police, on 7th June 1983. On 27th November 2001, while the Respondent was posted to 916 Provost Unit (General Reserve Engineer Force, or GREF), he was detailed as a member of Mobile Squad and was tasked to carry out checks of various Gref detachments located on the Udhampur-Srinagar highway. On completion of duty, the Squad Commander reported the following activities of the Respondent: a) He had demanded Rs. 15000 from the Commander 367 RM Platoon (Kanbal) against surplus construction stores held with the platoon; b) he had taken 100 litres of HSD (high speed diesel) with barrel from Superintendent BR-I HL Meena of 367 Platoon, Gund Detachment and thereafter had sold it along wit...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //