Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 4330/2012 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4365/2012 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4366/2012 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 6199/2012 M/S BAYER BIOSCIENCE PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7853/2012 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners :Mr R. Parthasarthy and Mr Anil Dutt and Mr Sudarshan S. Shekhawat for petitioner in all matters. For the Respondents :Mr Saqib for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4330/2012. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms Saakshi Agarwal for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4365/2012 & W.P.(C) 4366/2012. Mr Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for R-1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2015 + W.P.(C) 4330/2012 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEED CO. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4365/2012 SUNGRO SEEDS LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 4366/2012 DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 6199/2012 M/S BAYER BIOSCIENCE PVT LTD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR + W.P.(C) 7853/2012 MONSANTO HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners :Mr R. Parthasarthy and Mr Anil Dutt and Mr Sudarshan S. Shekhawat for petitioner in all matters. For the Respondents :Mr Saqib for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4330/2012. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms Saakshi Agarwal for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 4365/2012 & W.P.(C) 4366/2012. Mr Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr Nitya Sharma for R-1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:9. h January, 2015 % + I.A. No.24863/2014 IN CS(OS) 3812/2014 NOVARTIS AG & ANR Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta R.Jha, Ms.Shilpa Arora & Mr.Talha Rahman, Advs. versus CIPLA LTD Through ..... Defendant Mr.P.Chidambaram, Sr. Adv., Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. and Mrs.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Bitika Sharma, Ms.Anusuya Nigam & Mr.Vihan Dang, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of patent no.222346 granted under The Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in favour of plaintiff No.1, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery-up etc. By this order I propose to decide the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.2. Two plaintiffs have filed the present suit against Cipla Ltd. The plaintiff No.1 (the expression include...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:9. h January, 2015 % + I.A. No.24863/2014 IN CS(OS) 3812/2014 NOVARTIS AG & ANR Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta R.Jha, Ms.Shilpa Arora & Mr.Talha Rahman, Advs. versus CIPLA LTD Through ..... Defendant Mr.P.Chidambaram, Sr. Adv., Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. and Mrs.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Bitika Sharma, Ms.Anusuya Nigam & Mr.Vihan Dang, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of patent no.222346 granted under The Patents Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in favour of plaintiff No.1, rendition of accounts/damages, delivery-up etc. By this order I propose to decide the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.2. Two plaintiffs have filed the present suit against Cipla Ltd. The plaintiff No.1 (the expression include...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h January, 2015. + W.P.(C) No.151/2015, CM No.245/2015 CM No.246/2015 (for exemption) (for stay) and EASTERN ECONOMIST LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sanghi & Mr. Salyendra Kumar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms. Nidhi Raman & Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advs. for R-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks declaration of the second proviso to Section 3(a) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act), inter alia providing that only an Officer of the Statutory Authority concerned shall be appointed as an Estate Officer in respect of the public premises controlled by that Authority, as ultra vires. The petition also claims certain other and ancillary reliefs.2. For conspectus of the matter, it may be stated tha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-07-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the award dated 30.12.2005 passed by the Court of Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in Industrial Dispute No.37/2001 vide Annexure-A. ) C.A.V. Judgment : D.H. Waghela, CJ. 1. The petitioner, management of National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), has challenged the award dated 30-12-2005 of the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru in I.D.No.37/2001, directing regularization of services of 24 workmen from the date of reference, with appropriate pay scales. 2. The petitioner is stated to be a constituent unit of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi which is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and actively engaged in research and development work in science and technology area of aerospace. The petitioner is stated to be undertaking sponsored projects of the Government and other public and private institutions on commercial basis. Regular emplo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-07-2015
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7h DAY OF JANUARY2015R PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL.R.B. W.P. No.9974/2006 (L-TER) BETWEEN: The Management of National Aerospace Laboratories, Kodihalli Campus, BANGALORE 560 017 by its Director. (By Sri S.N.Murthy, Sr.counsel a/w Sri G.Lakshmeesh Rao, Adv.) AND :1. Engineering & General Workers Union, No.2, Mill Corner, Sampige Road, Malleshwaram, BANGALORE 560 003 by its Secretary.2. The Managing Director ...PETITIONER M/s. NALTECH Pvt. Ltd. T.S.Building, Kodihalli, BANGALORE 560 017 (By Sri V.R.Datar a/w Sri K.B.Narayana Swamy, Advs. for M/s. M.C.Narasimhan Associates, Advs. for caveator/R-1; Sri Ramchandran, Adv. for M.R.C.Ravi, Adv. for R-2) ...RESPONDENTS - 2 - This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the award dated 30.12.2005 passed by the Court of Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in Industrial Disp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-06-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 4898/2013 & CM No.11109/2013 THE FERTILISER ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Kaveta Wadia & Mr Shashank Tripathi. For the Respondents : Mr Saqib. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is an association of fertilizer manufacturers/importers and has filed the present petition impugning:1. 1 Clauses 5 & 6 of the Office Memorandum (hereafter OM) dated 03.05.2013 (hereafter OM-1) whereby the fertilizer manufacturers/importers were directed to reduce the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of other grades of Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers to the extent of the amount mentioned in the OM-1. The fertilizer manufacturers/importers were further warned that action would be taken against the entities who did not comply with the pric...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-06-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 4898/2013 & CM No.11109/2013 THE FERTILISER ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Kaveta Wadia & Mr Shashank Tripathi. For the Respondents : Mr Saqib. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is an association of fertilizer manufacturers/importers and has filed the present petition impugning:1. 1 Clauses 5 & 6 of the Office Memorandum (hereafter OM) dated 03.05.2013 (hereafter OM-1) whereby the fertilizer manufacturers/importers were directed to reduce the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of other grades of Phosphatic and Potassic (P&K) fertilizers to the extent of the amount mentioned in the OM-1. The fertilizer manufacturers/importers were further warned that action would be taken against the entities who did not comply with the pric...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-05-2015
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7133 OF2008UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ......APPELLANTS Versus PURUSHOTTAM .....RESPONDENT JUDGMENT VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J.1 The Respondent herein, No.7773409X Havildar (Military Police) Purushottam, was enrolled in the Corps of Military Police, on 7th June 1983. On 27th November 2001, while the Respondent was posted to 916 Provost Unit (General Reserve Engineer Force, or GREF), he was detailed as a member of Mobile Squad and was tasked to carry out checks of various Gref detachments located on the Udhampur-Srinagar highway. On completion of duty, the Squad Commander reported the following activities of the Respondent: a) He had demanded Rs. 15000 from the Commander 367 RM Platoon (Kanbal) against surplus construction stores held with the platoon; b) he had taken 100 litres of HSD (high speed diesel) with barrel from Superintendent BR-I HL Meena of 367 Platoon, Gund Detachment and thereafter had sold it along wit...
Tag this Judgment!