Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-02-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 3110/2011 & CM65772011 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PRIVATE LIMITED versus ..... Petitioner HATIM ALI & ANR. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 5809/2011 and CM118332011 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PRIVATE LIMITED versus ..... Petitioner ASEEM TAKYAR ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shweta Bharti. For the Respondent : Mr.Y.R. Malhotra in W.P.(C) 3110/2011. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner calls into question rulings of the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) order dated 15.04.2011 impugned in W.P.(C) No.3110/2011 and order dated 08.06.2011 impugned in W.P.(C) No.5809/2011 (hereafter impugned orders) - holding the petitioner to be a Public Authority within the meaning of section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act) and calling upon the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No.531/1998 Judgment reserved on 7th January, 2015 % Judgment delivered on 30th January, 2015 + CRL.A. 531/1998 SHIV KUMAR @ NIGRO Through: Mr.M.L. Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J1 The challenge in the present appeal under section 374 of the Criminal Procedure code is to the judgment dated 02.09.1998 and order on sentence dated 04.09.1998 by which the appellant has been held guilty under section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs 1000 and in default of payment of fine further simple imprisonment for 15 days.2. The brief facts of the case, as noticed by the trial court, are as under:that on 15.05.1995 one Hariender Ram (deceased) boarded bus route No.433 along with Pt Ganga Dayal (PW2) and Bhola Ram (PW4) from Amar Jyoti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 992/2011 Judgment reserved on 6th January, 2015 Judgment produced on 30th January, 2015 % VIKAS alias VICKY alias PONGA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L. Yadav, Advocate versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J1 Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, against the judgment and order on sentence dated 4.6.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge01 (Outer), Rohini, Delhi, by which the appellant has been directed to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.4,000/- and in default of payment of fine Simple Imprisonment for two months for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code; Rigorous Imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine Simple Imprisonment...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h January, 2015 + CRL.A. 1451/2012 VANDANA KUMARI AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena APP along with SI Varun Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 6th October, 2012 in Sessions Case No.67/2011 arising out of FIR No.283/10 u/s 317/304/120B IPC whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC r/w Section 120 B IPC, u/s 317 IPC r/w Section 120B IPC and 120 B IPC and order on sentence dated 24th November, 2012, whereby they were sentenced to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/- each, in default three months SI u/s 304 Part I IPC r/w Section 120 B IPC, 5 years RI u/s 317 IPC r/w 120B IPC and 7 years RI and fine of Rs.5,000/- each u/s 120B IPC in default three months SI, the present appeal has been preferred.2. At the ou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-28-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE28H DAY OF JANUARY20158TH MAGHA, 1936 OP (MAC).No. 1 of 2015 (O) --------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER DATED1612.2014 MADE IN UNNUMBERED O.P. ON THE FILE OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR PETITIONER: -------------------------- E.I.SUGUNAN AGED64YEARS S/O. ITTIKUNJI, RESIDING AT EDAKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE EDATHIRUTHY POST, EDATHIRUTHY VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------- 1. P.M.RIYAS S/O. MUHAMMED, RESIDING AT PADAVALAPPARAMBIL HOUSE CHALINGAD POST KAIPAMANGALAM, KODUNGALLUR THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 681.2. P.C. SANIL, S/O. CHANDRAN, RESIDING AT PUTHUVEETTIL HOUSE KATTOOR POST, MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680702.3. P.B. BIBIN, S/O. P.K. BALAN, RESIDING AT PUTHUVEETTIL HOUSE KARANCHIRA, KATTOOR POST, MUKUNDAPURAM THRISSUR DISTRICT-680702.4. NATIONAL INSURANCE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Jan-28-2015
1. The borrower has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the impugned action of the respondentState Bank of India (for short 'the Bank') of publishing photographs of the petitioners in the newspapers declaring them as defaulter is illegal and without any authority of law; to issue a writ of prohibition prohibiting the Bank from publishing such photographs and from adopting extra legal means of publishing photographs to recover the dues from the petitioners. 2. Petitioner No.1 is a company whereas the petitioners No.2 and 3 are its Directors. The company is engaged in the business of manufacturing of MS CTD Bar, Round, Angle, Channel, Flat, Square, etc. In order to fulfill its working capital, it applied for and was sanctioned cash credit facility to the tune of Rs.275 lacs and SME credit plus to the tune of Rs.25 lacs in December, 2008. A residential house originally mortgaged in another loan account of M/s Mohan Marketi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7011/2012 & CM100562013 M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6800/2013 NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 1663/2012 EI DUPONT INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms Sonu Bhatnagar and Mr Udit Jain for petitioner in W.P.(C) 7011/2012. Mr Tarun Gulati and Ms Vibhooti Malhotra in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1 in W.P.(C) 7011/2012 and W.P.(C) 1663/2012. Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Saakshi Agarwal for R-1 to R-4/UOI in W.P.(C) 1663/2012. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7011/2012 & CM100562013 M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6800/2013 NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 1663/2012 EI DUPONT INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms Sonu Bhatnagar and Mr Udit Jain for petitioner in W.P.(C) 7011/2012. Mr Tarun Gulati and Ms Vibhooti Malhotra in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1 in W.P.(C) 7011/2012 and W.P.(C) 1663/2012. Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Saakshi Agarwal for R-1 to R-4/UOI in W.P.(C) 1663/2012. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2015 W.P.(C) 7011/2012 & CM100562013 M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6800/2013 NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 1663/2012 EI DUPONT INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms Sonu Bhatnagar and Mr Udit Jain for petitioner in W.P.(C) 7011/2012. Mr Tarun Gulati and Ms Vibhooti Malhotra in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1 in W.P.(C) 7011/2012 and W.P.(C) 1663/2012. Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 to R-4 in W.P.(C) 6800/2013. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Saakshi Agarwal for R-1 to R-4/UOI in W.P.(C) 1663/2012. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-23-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE23D DAY OF JANUARY20153RD MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 20695 of 2014 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:-: --------------------------------------------- 1. VATAKARA TALUK PRIVATE BUS OPERATORS ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY GOPALAN NAMBIAR K.K.2. P.K.PAVITHRAN, PULICKOL THAZHAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, VATAKARA. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,VATAKARA (SECRETARY,R.T.A, VATAKARA) VATAKARA PIN - 673 101.2. THE PRINCIPAL, HI-TECH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, NEAR ASHOKA TALKIES VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE - 673 101.3. THE PRINCIPAL, ARABINDO INSTITUTE OF COMMERCE MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY NEAR SYNDICATE BANK, EDODI, VATAKARA PIN - 673 101.4. THE C-APT MULTIMEDIA ACADEMY, IT SAMURAI, NEW BUS STAND, VATAKARA PIN - 673 101.5. VIMS PARA MEDICAL INSTITUTION, VIMS H...
Tag this Judgment!