Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Feb-20-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (PIL) No. 4715 OF2013Court On Its Own Motion Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others WITH W.P (PIL) No. 6822 OF2013Mridushila Murmu wife of Sikandar Tudu r/o village Bhetatola PO & PS Maheshpur District Pakuar Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Health Medical Education & Family Member at Nepal House, PO & PS Doranda, Distt. Ranchi 3.The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Jharkhand at Namkum, PO & PS Namkum, Distt. Ranchi 4.The Mission Director, NRHM at Namkum PO & PS Namkum, Distt. Ranchi 5.The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical officer, Pakur, PO PS & Distt. Pakur 6.The Dy. Commissioner, Pakur, PO PS & Distt. Pakur 7.Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Circular Road, Ranchi ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Appellant/Petitioner : Mr.Sumeet Gadodia, Amicus Curiae (In W.P (PIL) No. 4715/2013) For the Appellant/Petitioner : Mr.K.K.O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-20-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :20. 02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN Crl.A.(MD)No.354 of 2007 A.Kumaran .. Appellant/Single Accused Vs. State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Melur, Crime No.1390 of 2005, Madurai District. .. Respondent/Complainant Criminal appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence dated 05.09.2006 passed in Sessions Case No.109 of 2006 by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Madurai. For Appellant : Mr.A.K.Azhagarsamy Legal Aid Counsel For Respondent : Mr.K.S.Duraipandian Addl.Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by A.SELVAM, J.) This Criminal Appeal has been directed against the convictions and sentences dated 05.09.2006 passed in Sessions Case No.109 of 2006 by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Madurai.2. The crux of the case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant by name Jeyalakshmi is the wife o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-20-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.11.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.NOs.16270 to 16285, 16293 to 16301 and 16303 to 16309 of 2009, W.P.NOs.16363 to 16376 of 2009 and M.P.NO.1 to 1 OF2009Balasubramaniam .Petitioner in W.P.No.16270 of 2009 R.Palaniammal .Petitioner in W.P.No.16271 of 2009 S.Sandiyagu .Petitioner in W.P.No.16272 of 2009 N.Arjunan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16273,16309 of 2009 S.M.Simon .Petitioner in W.P.No.16274 of 2009 M.Baskar .Petitioner in W.P.No.16275 of 2009 R.L.Dhanapal .Petitioner in W.P.No.16276,16278, 16296,16297,16303, 16304 of 2009 Ranganathan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16277 of 2009 V.Amul Anand .Petitioner in W.P.No.16279 of 2009 Iyanan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16280 of 2009 V.D.Sridharan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16281 of 2009 Vanaja Kumari .Petitioner in W.P.No.16282 of 2009 N.Balaraman .Petitioner in W.P.No.16283 of 2009 K.Vijayan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16284 of 2009 N.Velu .Petitioner in W.P.No.16285 of 2009 Rukya Bai .Petitioner in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-20-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.11.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.NOs.15954, 12597, 13368, 13839 and 13840 of 2009 22691 to 22695 of 2008, 14583, 13908 to 13911 and 16769 of 2009 and 20729 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1,2,2,2 and 2 of 2009 2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,2,3,4,4,5,5,4,6,6,7 and 7 of 2008,2,2,2,2,2,2,3 of 2009 and 2,3 and 4 of 2008 W.P.NO.15954 OF2009 The Tamilnadu Physical Education Teachers Directors Association, Chennai (Reg.No.69/2008).represented by its South Chennai Secretary, No.11,Sivaraman Street, Triplicane, Chennai-600 005.Petitioner versus 1.M/s.Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE).represented by its Assistant Secretary, Regional Office, Chennai New No.3 (Old No.1630-A) J-Block, Anna Nagar (W).16th Main Road, Chennai-600 040. 2.M/s.Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE).represented by its Chairman, Secretary and Chief Vigilance Officer, CBSE HeadquarteRs.No.2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110 092. 3.M/s.Department of Schoo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-20-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.11.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.NOs.16270 to 16285, 16293 to 16301 and 16303 to 16309 of 2009, W.P.NOs.16363 to 16376 of 2009 and M.P.NO.1 to 1 OF2009Balasubramaniam .Petitioner in W.P.No.16270 of 2009 R.Palaniammal .Petitioner in W.P.No.16271 of 2009 S.Sandiyagu .Petitioner in W.P.No.16272 of 2009 N.Arjunan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16273,16309 of 2009 S.M.Simon .Petitioner in W.P.No.16274 of 2009 M.Baskar .Petitioner in W.P.No.16275 of 2009 R.L.Dhanapal .Petitioner in W.P.No.16276,16278, 16296,16297,16303, 16304 of 2009 Ranganathan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16277 of 2009 V.Amul Anand .Petitioner in W.P.No.16279 of 2009 Iyanan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16280 of 2009 V.D.Sridharan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16281 of 2009 Vanaja Kumari .Petitioner in W.P.No.16282 of 2009 N.Balaraman .Petitioner in W.P.No.16283 of 2009 K.Vijayan .Petitioner in W.P.No.16284 of 2009 N.Velu .Petitioner in W.P.No.16285 of 2009 Rukya Bai .Petitioner in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 19, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.77/2014 LT.R.P.YADAV Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated September 24, 2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal rejecting MA No.277/2012 and MA No.478/2012 wherein prayer made by the writ petitioner was to be permitted to examine Lt.CommanderV.K.Lekhi and Lt.Commander S.Gantyat on oath; and that the respondents be directed to produce the investigation reports of the said persons submitted in terms of Regulation 149 of Part II (Statutory) Regulations for the Navy.2. Briefly encapsulated, the facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition are that in the month of March 2001, the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2015
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1704/2014 Date of decision:19. h February, 2015 KARAN @ VICKY ..... Appellant Through Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP along with Inspector Subodh Kumar, ATO, Patel Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Appellant-Karan @ Vicky by the impugned judgment dated 11 th September, 2014 stands convicted for offences under Sections 147/148 and Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) in a charge sheet arising out of FIR No.182/2007, Police Station Patel Nagar. By order on sentence dated 11th September, 2014, the appellant-Karan has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 149, IPC. In default of payment of fine, the appellant is required to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: February 19, 2015 I.A. No.18151/2012 & I.A. No.19804/2013 in CS(OS) 3000/2012 LAVERANA GMBH & CO KG ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Manav Kumar, Adv. versus MAC PERSONAL CARE PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.S.K.Bansal, Adv. with Mr.Ajay Amitabh Suman & Mr.Vikas Khera, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining passing off, damages, delivery up etc. against the defendants with regard to trade name/trademark LAVERA in relation to natural cosmetics and other body care products. Along with the suit, plaintiff also filed an application being I.A. 18151/2012 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.2. The defendant No.1 is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of cosmetics, creams for hair/skin/oral/ personal care products etc. Defendant nos. 2 and 3 are...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:18. 02.2015 CS(OS) 1309/2012 INTERNATIONAL HISPACOL S.A Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Amit Bansal, Mr. Saurabh Bindal, Ms.Madhu Sweta and Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocates. versus CASTMASTER ENTERPRISE PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vineet Jhanji, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(oral) I.A.No.1455/2014 1 This is an application filed by the defendant under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) seeking reference of their disputes (subject matter of the suit) to Arbitration. Submission is that the parties are governed by Part-II and under Section 45 of the said Act where there is an international commercial arbitration {within the meaning of Section 2 (f) of the said Act} therefore proceedings before this Court cannot continue. 2 Application has been opposed. 3 Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-18-2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.02.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Appeal (MD)No.305 of 2007 Karuppiah ..Appellant/ Sole Accused versus State through The Inspector of Police, Melavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. (Cr.No.138 of 2006) ..Respondent/ Complainant Prayer Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment passed in C.C.No.587 of 2006, dated 26.06.2007, by the learned Special District and Sessions Judge for EC Act and NDPS Act Cases, Madurai. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Jeyasingh (No appearance) ^For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Amicus Curiae : Mr.S.Balaji :JUDGMENT The appellant is the sole accused in C.C.No.587 of 2006 on the file of the Special Court for E.C.Act and NDPS Act Cases, Madurai and he stood charged and tried for the commission of the offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, (i...
Tag this Judgment!