Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-18-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY201529TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 26397 of 2013 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. A.N.S MENON @ A.N.SACHIDANADA MENON, AGED74YEARS, ALLAPPAT HOUSE, ALLAPPAT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI -16.2. V.S.SANKARA NARAYANAN, S/O.A.N.S MENON, AGED45YEARS, ALLAPPAT HOUSE, ALLAPPAT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI -16.3. V.S.SETHUMADHAVAN, S/O.A.N.S.MENON, AGED44YEARS, ALLAPPAT HOUSE, ALLAPPAT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI -16. BY ADVS.SRI.BIJU MARTIN SRI.D.M.NOWFAL SRI.M.M.SALIM RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE KOCHI CORPORATION REPERSENTED BY IT SECRETARY, KOCHI -11.2. A.N.LEELAVATHI @ LEELAMA, W/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN, ALLAPPAT, ALLAPPAT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI- 16. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.JUSTINE(KARIPAT)SC,COCHIN CORPN SRI.P.K.SOYUZ,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.R.JAGADEESH SRI.V.A.VINOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-17-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE APPEAL FROM ITS CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Honble Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Honble Justice Samapti Chatterjee APO428OF2014A.P. 194 OF2011DCM DECOMETAL GMBH VS. ROHIT FERRO TECH LIMITED For the Appellant : Mr. Anindya Mitra, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhrajit Mitra. Sr. Advocate Mr. Soumya Roychowdhury, Advocate Mr. Sandip Dasgupta, Advocate Mr. Ravitej Chillu Muri, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Sr. Advocate Mr. Tilak Bose, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ratnesh Kr. Rai, Advocate Mr.Anumoy Bose, Advocate Ms. Manali Bose, Advocate Heard On :27. 01.2015, 28.01.2015, 29.01.2015, 30.01.2015, 3.02.2015 & 4.02.2015. Judgment On :17. h February, 2015. Samapti Chatterjee, J.The appellant/petitioner filed the instant appeal assailing the order dated 23.07.2014 passed by the Honble Single Judge in A.P. No.194 of 2011. The facts of the case is that the appellant/petitioner is an Austrian C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA MONDAY,THE16H DAY OF FEBRUARY201527TH MAGHA, 1936 LA.App..No. 776 of 2014 () --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN LAR42013 of SUB COURT, PALA DATED2703-2014 APPELLANTS/CLAIMANTS: ------------------------------------ 1. M.K. SHYLA MURIKOLLIL HOUSE, THALAPPALAM KARA, ERATTUPETTA.2. M.K.FAISAL MURIKOLLIL HOUSE, THALAPPALAM KARA, ERATTUPETTA.3. K.M.RESILI MURIKOLLIL HOUSE, THALAPPALAM KARA, ERATTUPETTA.4. M.K.ANAS MURIKOLLIL HOUSE, THALAPPALAM KARA, ERATTUPETTA.5. M.K.NABEEL MURIKOLLIL HOUSE, THALAPPALAM KARA, ERATTUPETTA. BY ADVS.SRI.JAMES KURIAN SRI.SANTHOSH MODAYIL K.C. JOSEPH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOTTAYAM686001.2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD ROADS DIVISION, KOTTAYAM686001. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. ALOYSIUS THOMAS THIS ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:18. 11.2014 Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2015 % + ARB. P. 534/2013 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ....Petitioner Versus KOHINOOR FOODS LIMITED .....Respondent ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner : Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Dhruv Dewan, Mr Rohan Batra & Mr Kostubh Devnani, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan & Ms Tejaswi Shetty, Advocates. CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J Arb. P. 534/2013 & IA No.18102/2014 (u/s 151 CPC) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), seeking a direction for appointment of an arbitrator, albeit on behalf of the respondent. 1.1 The petitioner, relies upon clause 13 (b)(ii) of ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) Master Agreement dated 03.07.2006 [hereafter referred to as the Master Agreement]., as modified by the acco...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-13-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:16. h January, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:13. h February, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 578/2006 ASHOK DOGRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo, Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Manish Shukla and Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K.Mishra, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 16.01.1999 and order on sentence dated 18.01.1999 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, awarding the sentence to the petitioner to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and fine of Rs.3,000/- under Section 498A IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months; sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 406 IPC and upholding the judgment of conviction by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 01.08.2006, the present...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Feb-13-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2593 of 2013 --- Dr. Shambhu Sharan Lal son of late Dineshwar Lal, resident of Dineshwar Villa, C.R.P. Colony, Harmu, P.O. Argora, P.S. Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. ..Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand.2. Sri Jyoti Udai Tete, son of Kristochit Tete, Deputy Superintendent of Vigilance Bureau, Ranchi Region, Ranchi (informant) at Nepal House Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. ..Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandra Kaushal, Advocate For the Vigilance : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. 05/13.02.2015: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State-Vigilance. This application has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of Vigilance P.S. Case no.27 of 2000 (Special Case no.14 of 2000) including the order dated 22.6.2013 whereby and whereunder learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Ranchi has take...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Feb-11-2015
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.6710of2013 M/sVATechWabagLimited,acompanydulyregisteredunderthe provisionsoftheIndianCompaniesActthroughitsManagerLegal Mr.S.T.Balayogeshwaran,sonofShriSiva.Suyambuhavingits registered office at 11, Murray's Gate Road, Alwarpet, P.O. Mylapore, P.S. Teynampet, Town and District Chennai 600018 (Tamil Nadu) andone ofitsworksatandP.O.Bhelatand,P.S. Barwadda,DistrictDhanbad ... Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand,throughtheAdditionalSecretary, DepartmentofDrinkingWaterandSanitation,Ranchi 2.TheSuperintendingEngineer,DrinkingWaterandSanitation Circle,Dhanbad 3.TheExecutiveEngineer,DrinkingWaterandSanitation Circle,Dhanbad 4.M/sAbhayKumarSinha,sonofBrajKishorePrasad, Telipara,Hirapur,Dhanbad ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.Mr.SauravKumar,Advocate Mr.IndrajitSinha,Advocate Ms.SuchitraPandey,Advocate Mr.ArpanMishra,Advocate FortheRespondentState:Mr.RajeshShankar,G.A. Mr.AbhayPraka...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Feb-10-2015
By the Court: This criminal misc. petition under section 482 CrPC has been filed on behalf of the petitioners with a prayer for quashing the FIR No.123/2011 dated 12.11.2011 of Women Police Station, Udaipur. The FIR has been registered at the instance of respondent No.2, who happened to be daughter-in-law of the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and sister-in-law of petitioner No.4. The petitioner No.3 is the husband of petitioner No.4. In the FIR, the respondent No.2 has stated that her marriage was solemnized with Sunil Kumar (hereinafter referred to as 'accused No.1') son of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 on 07.05.2004 in Udaipur. It is further stated in the FIR that at the time of marriage of the respondent No.2 with accused No.1, other accused-persons had informed that he is a Mechanical Engineer working in Delhi and earning a very handsome salary and on believing that statement of the accused-persons, the father of respondent No.2 gifted gold ornaments weighing 30 tolas worth Rs.8,00,000/- and oth...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 307/2011 Reserved on:2. d February, 2015 Decided on:10. h February, 2015 % RAJENDRA KATARIA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Bhachawat, Mr. Manoj Joshi, Advs. versus BALDESH KUMAR KAUSHIK & ORS ..... Respondent Through Ms. Reeta Kaul, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The petitioner impugnes the order dated 8th April, 2011 whereby his application for leave to defend, the eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the DRC Act) has been dismissed.2. Respondent No.1 filed an eviction petition claiming himself to be the co-owner of premises bearing No.699 Chirag Delhi measuring 500 sq. ft. along with respondent Nos. 2 to 6. The said tenanted premises was let out to the petitioner for commercial purpose for running a clinic on a monthly rent of ` 187/- excluding water and electricity charges. It was stated that the respondent No.1 re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-10-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h February, 2015 + CRL.A. 244/2011 MITHU RAI Through: ..... Appellant Mr.D.B.Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Hussain, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 24.09.2010 and order on sentence dated 11.10.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini, Delhi in Session Case No.191/09 arising out of FIR No.447/07, P.S.Adarsh Nagar wherein the appellant was convicted u/s 376(2)(f) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 60 days. He was granted benefit of Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.2. The victim in the instant case is a minor child aged about 5 years at the time of incident, who was subjected to rape by the accus...
Tag this Judgment!