Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 12, 2014 % + CRL.A. 979/2012 HEERA LAL @ HEERA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Shiv Chopra and Ms.Megha, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Rajeev Vimal, PS Kalyan Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Heera Lal is convicted of the offence of robbery and murder of Jagan Singh Chauhan and awarded imprisonment for life.2. The case of prosecution rest on circumstantial evidence in the form of statements of Umesh Chauhan PW-1 and Tushar Chauhan PW-2 having last seen Heera Lal with the deceased on the night of June 07, 2010, recovery of shirt of Heera Lal which was found to be blood stained with human blood of B group origin which tallied with that of deceased and the recovery of weapon of offence an iron r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 11,2014 + CRL.A. 234/2013 SHISH RAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate for the appellant with appellant in J.C. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Mahesh Kumar, PS S.B.Dairy Complainant Smt.Preeti Sharma in person with Mr.Ajay Garg, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. There are seven deadly sins : wrath, avarice, sloth, pride, lust, envy and drunkenness. But in the modern society we find that some of them have contrived to pass themselves off as virtues. For instance avarice has rebaptized itself as thrift and pride as self-respect. Envy claims to be the corner-stone upon which the present eras competitive system is founded. But one out of the seven vices continues to be unfortunate. It remains undisguised and does not even make an atte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 11,2014 + CRL.A. 234/2013 SHISH RAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate for the appellant with appellant in J.C. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Mahesh Kumar, PS S.B.Dairy Complainant Smt.Preeti Sharma in person with Mr.Ajay Garg, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. There are seven deadly sins : wrath, avarice, sloth, pride, lust, envy and drunkenness. But in the modern society we find that some of them have contrived to pass themselves off as virtues. For instance avarice has rebaptized itself as thrift and pride as self-respect. Envy claims to be the corner-stone upon which the present eras competitive system is founded. But one out of the seven vices continues to be unfortunate. It remains undisguised and does not even make an atte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 10, 2014 % + CRL.A.1431/2014 RAKESH @ TONI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Balbir Singh, PTC Jharoda Kalan and SI Mahender Partap, PS Sultan Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has three parts. Under the heading Relevance of Facts Part-I contains sections which guide the court in determining as to which facts would be relevant at a trial to determine the facts in issue. Under the heading On Proof Part-II contains sections which guide the court in determining how relevant facts or facts in issue have to be proved, and which would include documents. It contains provisions concerning presumptions pertaining to documents. Under the heading Production and Effect of Evidence...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 10, 2014 % + CRL.A.1431/2014 RAKESH @ TONI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Balbir Singh, PTC Jharoda Kalan and SI Mahender Partap, PS Sultan Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has three parts. Under the heading Relevance of Facts Part-I contains sections which guide the court in determining as to which facts would be relevant at a trial to determine the facts in issue. Under the heading On Proof Part-II contains sections which guide the court in determining how relevant facts or facts in issue have to be proved, and which would include documents. It contains provisions concerning presumptions pertaining to documents. Under the heading Production and Effect of Evidence...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Tag this Judgment!