Necessary Deposit - Judgment Search Results

Oriental Benefit and Deposit Society Ltd. Vs. Bharat Kumar K. Shah

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2001]103CompCas947(Mad)

already passed, several of the contentions, which he wanted to urge, have become academic and it is not necessary for this court to consider the same. However, he stressed three of the contentions for our consideration.5. The … at 3.31 p.m. on September 14, 1996, practically at the last moment and without being accompanied by a deposit of Rs. 500. It is his further contention that the suit itself was not maintainable.3. The learned judge

Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarnt.Corpn. Vs. Ragupathi Ragavan and O ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

one paisa in the Rupee.” 28. The aforestated Regulation 22 also provides that the Official Liquidator, after making necessary provision for the expenses in relation to the liquidation proceedings and for declaration of dividend, as prescribed in … against the aforestated judgment. Permission was granted to the present appellant and therefore, this appeal.3. The appellant is Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Corporation’). The function of the Corporation is to

Delhi Safe Deposits Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2004)188CTR(Del)602; 110(2004)DLT273; 2004(73)DRJ413; [2004]269ITR66(Delhi)

including deficiencies of capital, shall be paid first out of profits, next out of capital, and, lastly, if necessary, by the partners individually in the proportions in which they were entitled to share profits; (b) the assets … unanswered. 3. The facts relevant to decide the aforesaid questions are as under: 4. The assessed- Delhi Safe Deposits Company Ltd. entered into an agreement of partnership with John Elliot on 15-2-1964. A copy of the agreement

Delhi Safe Deposits Co. Vs. Cit

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2004]136TAXMAN417(Delhi)

including deficiencies of capital, shall be paid first out of profits, next out of capital, and, lastly, if necessary, by the partners individually in the proportions in which they were entitled to share profits;(b) the assets of … and is returned unanswered.3. The facts relevant to decide the aforesaid questions are as under.4. The assessed-Delhi Safe Deposits Company Ltd. entered into an agreement of partnership with John Elliot on 15-2-1964. A copy of the agreement

Blue Peaks Deposits and Advance Ltd. Vs. Madan Sharma

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: I(2005)BC56

learned trial Magistrate dismissed the complaint without going into the fact whether the presence of the complainant was necessary. 7. As observed by the Apex Court in Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. Keshvanand, I (1998) CCR 82

Sahara Deposits and Investments (1) Ltd. Vs. Majidan and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1993IIIAD(Delhi)1088; 1993(27)DRJ398

Usha Mehra, J. (1) This Court had ordered service of respondent by affixation. The affixation was done at the last known address of the respondent. The Process Server has deposed on the summons that there was...

Gujarat Safe Deposit Co. Ltd. Vs. Mustafa Mohmed Dabhi and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1978)19GLR769

proved before them. If the arbitrators or the umpire comply with the requisition and file the award alongwith necessary accompaniments, no application is required to be made to the Court tor the purposes of Section 14 of … arbitrators or the umpire (expression used is 'shall') to file in the co-obligant court the award alongwith the depositions and documents which have been received on record and proved before them. If the arbitrators or the umpire

Calcutta Safe Deposit Co. Ltd. Vs. Ranjit Mathuradas Sampat

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1971Cal78,[1971]41CompCas1063(Cal)

amount from the Special Officer who replied on November 25, 1969 to the effect that he would seek necessary directions from the High Court in that regard and in the meantime he enquired of the bankers to … Mohan Datta, J.1. This is an application for the stay of the winding up proceedings of Calcutta Safe Deposit Co., Ltd. (hereinafter called the said company). The petitioning creditor in the winding up proceedings is one Ranjit

Gujarat Safe Deposit Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1988)26ITD295(Ahd.)

the Tribunal over the true character of the investments this year in which such questions have directly and necessarily arisen in the context of company's claim for its deductibility as a 'bad debt' or allow-ability as a … to the effect that it was not disputed that even in earlier years the company had made short-term deposits and that those were accepted as business deposits and were also taxed as income of the company. The

Madras Deposit and Benefit Society Limited Vs. Oonnamalai Ammal and an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1895)ILR18Mad29

Act, since it purports to create a legal mortgage.2. Nor can the plaintiff company fall back upon the deposit of the title-deeds. There was no antecedent debt to secure which the title-deeds were deposited, and it is