Mutt - Judgment Search Results

Raghavendra Swamy Mutt Vs. Uttaradi Mutt

Court: Supreme Court of India

of suit property subject to the right of the defendant Mutt to perform Adradhanas and Poojas of the Vrindavanas at Navavrindavanagatti.4.

Uttaradi Mutt Vs. Raghavendra Swamy Mutt

Court: Supreme Court of India

of SLP(C) No.229 of 2018) Uttaradi Mutt :Versus: Raghavendra Swamy Mutt …..Appellant(s) ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal arises from

Sri Raghavendraswamy Mutt Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

respondent No.2, Superintendent of Police- respondent No.3 and Shri Uttaradi Mutt- respondent No.4 seeking for the aforesaid reliefs. 4.2. It is

Shri Uttaradi Mutt Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

One of the writ petitions filed by Shri Raghavendra Swamy Mutt has been dismissed with an observation that there is nothing

Sri Pushpagiri Mutt, by Its Peedathipathi Sri Vidya Nrusimha Bharathy ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)1MLJ54

by the plaintiff-Mutt, viz. 'Sri Pushpagiri Mutt, Cuddappah'. The plaintiff Mutt has to be represented by some person. Instead of filing

Chinna Jeeyangar Mutt, Thirupathi Vs. C.V. Purushotham and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1974AP175

re-entry. The lease was for necessity and benefit to the mutt. Prior to the lease the mutt was not deriving any

Sri. Admar Mutt Rep By Its Manager Vs. Smt. Yashoda W/o Late G Anantha ...

Court: Karnataka

Form No.7 applicant Anantha Bhatta was an employee/cook of the Mutt and he was given residential accommodation. It is pertinent to

Sri Raghavendraswami Mutt at Nanjangud Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1963AP292

remembered that Section 76 was struck down in the Sirur Mutt's case : [1954]1SCR1005 because of lack of legislative competence of

Pushpagiri Mutt Vs. C. Indiramma

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2003AP379; 2003(4)ALD267; 2003(4)ALT348

the plaintiff and the amount is lying with the defendant Mutt It is no doubt true that specifically the alternative relief

Sri Krishnapur Mutt, Udipi and anr. Vs. P. Gopalakrishnayya and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1967Kant65; AIR1967Mys65

B-1 said to be a Yadast granted by the plaintiff Mutt to the respondent's grandfather Venkappiah, in which it is noted