Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri Ramdevar Mutt vs Sri Devanayakacharya

Sri Ramdevar Mutt vs Sri Devanayakacharya

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Jun 22, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1521430

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/714/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Ramdevar Mutt

Respondent

Sri Devanayakacharya

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of karnataka at bengalurudated this the 22nd day of june, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice shivashankar amarannavar regular first appeal no. 714 of 2020 (inj) between:1. sri ramdevar muttregistered charitable trust c a site no.1, 1 a cross, iii stage, 4th cross basaveshwaranagar bangalore represented by its mahant swamy ramanujacharya aged about 32 years s/o pandit udaya narayana dixit. …appellant(by smt. champa m, advocate sri madhausudhan adiga b, advocate sri b k vishwanath, advocate) and: digitally signed by lakshminarayana 1. sri devanayakacharya murthy rajashri father name not known to plaintiff location: high court of aged about 80 years karnataka mahanth sri sathyanarayanaswamy temple trust, ittekegudu near mysore zoo mysore-570 010.2. sri ramadevara mutt trust having its registered office at melukote p.o., pandavapura taluk mandya district. and also at -2-sri lakshmi narayana swamy temple no.01, west of chord, 4th block 3rd stage, basaveshwaranagar bangalore-560 079. represented by trustee sri o pratap kumar. …respondents (by sri n kumar, advocate for r1 & r2) this rfa is filed under section 96 order xli rule rule 1 of cpc., against the judgment and decree dated 19.10.2019 passed in os.no.1744/2011 on the file of the xiv additional city civil judge, bengaluru, dismissing the suit for injunction. this appeal, coming on for admission this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr. justice shivashankar amarannavaroral judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant files memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.2. the memo reads thus: “the appellant in the above case prays that this hon’ble court be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as not pressed in the interest of justice.” -3-3. in view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- (shivashankar amarannavar) judge dsp list no.: 2 sl no.: 7

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No. 714 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN:

1. SRI RAMDEVAR MUTT

REGISTERED CHARITABLE TRUST C A SITE No.1, 1 A CROSS, III STAGE, 4TH CROSS BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS MAHANT SWAMY RAMANUJACHARYA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O PANDIT UDAYA NARAYANA DIXIT. …APPELLANT

(BY SMT. CHAMPA M, ADVOCATE SRI MADHAUSUDHAN ADIGA B, ADVOCATE SRI B K VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA 1. SRI DEVANAYAKACHARYA MURTHY RAJASHRI FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO PLAINTIFF Location: HIGH COURT OF AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS KARNATAKA MAHANTH SRI SATHYANARAYANASWAMY TEMPLE TRUST, ITTEKEGUDU NEAR MYSORE ZOO MYSORE-570 010.

2. SRI RAMADEVARA MUTT TRUST HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MELUKOTE P.O., PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. AND ALSO AT -2-

SRI LAKSHMI NARAYANA SWAMY TEMPLE No.01, WEST OF CHORD, 4TH BLOCK 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE-560 079. REPRESENTED BY TRUSTEE SRI O PRATAP KUMAR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 ORDER XLI RULE RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.10.2019 PASSED IN OS.No.1744/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant files memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.

2. The memo reads thus: “The appellant in the above case prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as not pressed in the interest of justice.” -3-

3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial