Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 1 preliminary Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 61 results (0.069 seconds)

Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories Vs. Stalco Freight International Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR134; II(2006)BC459; 2005(6)BomCR829

..... of lading that the court at united arab emirates will have exclusive jurisdiction?5. whether the suit is within the period of limitation under the terms of multimodal transportation of goods act 1993?6. whether the plaintiffs prove that the defendants are liable/responsible to deliver the cargo to the consignee directly despite the fact that the ..... suit. it has been thereafter contended that the suit is barred by law of limitation under the provisions of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993. it has been contended that the contract is governed by the said multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 and, therefore, the suit ought to have been filed within nine months from the accrual of cause ..... it is the case of the plaintiff that the said cargo was stuffed into f.c.l. container bearing no. apls 279834 and in respect of transportation of the said goods, the 2nd respondent issued a bill of lading no. mum/yer/0317 dated 25.3.2001 at mumbai. it is the case of the plaintiffs that .....

S.K. Networks Company Ltd. Vs. Amulya Exports Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2007Bom15; 2007(3)BomCR458

..... reproducing clause 6 of the rules of bill of lading. this act further provides and deals with multimodal transport contract and transport operator and determine also along with other sea act and other acts. the liability and responsibility is of multimodal transport operators for loss of damage to the goods. it further simplifies the procedure with a view to reducing and eliminating interpretation in the continuous ..... of trade, commerce and business at national or international level.23. the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (act 28 of 1993) came into force on 16th october, 1992 which provides for regulation of the multimodal transportation of goods from any place in india to a place outside india, on the basis of multimodal transport contract and for a matter connected there with. this act of 28 of .....

M.V. sea Success I Vs. Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and I ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR537

..... for a vessel. he referred to the inland vessels act, 1917 (amendment in 1977), the merchant shipping act, 1956 (amendment in 1983) and the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (amendment in 2000) to show the trend of domestic legislation in india towards making insurance compulsory and mandatory for ships and ..... multimodal transport operators and submitted that there is no good reason for holding that insurance is not necessary by following restricted view of english courts. mr. pratap submitted that the provisions of 1999 ..... durban in the context of ranking of claims against a fund comprising of sale proceeds of the vessel m.v. 'emrald transporter.'16. article 1(k) of 1952 brussels arrest convention which incorporates 'goods or materials wherever supplied to a ship for her operation or maintenance' as a maritime claim came to be considered by .....

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

..... to say.-- (a)... (b)... (c) proposals for designation of areas for open spaces, playgrounds, stadia, zoological gardens, green belts, nature reserves, sanctuaries and dairies; (d) transport and communications, such as roads, high-ways, park-ways, railways, water-ways, canals and air ports, including their extension and development; (e) water supply, drainage, sewerage, ..... permitted to reduce the amenities under the d.c. regulations without adequately and fully compensating the residents/purchasers of the regular part of the structure for good reasons to be recorded in writing by the commissioner. (e) that the final order allowing retention must reflect application of mind as regards the ' ..... development plan. the d'souza committee report on the draft development plan 1981 to 2001 inter alia stated as follows:4.03 nearly as good an example of the perverse effect of unrealistic standards is the first development plan's excessive freeze of land under reservations for amenities that could .....

Central Warehousing Corporation (a Govt. of India Undertaking) Vs. For ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj658

..... exercising jurisdiction under section 34 of the arbitration act to stay a proceeding pending before it. if authority is necessary for this proposition it may be found in chadha motor transport co. (p) ltd., delhi v. r.n. chopra and basanti cotton mills v. dhingra brothers. the submission that there is no identity of dispute is also ..... property. it is pertinent to note that section 41(1) does not employ the words 'suits and proceedings for recovery of possession of immovable property. there is a good deal of difference between the words 'relating to the recovery of possession' on the one hand and the terminology 'for recovery of possession of any immovable property'. the ..... decisions pressed into service by the petitioners. according to him, the observation of the division bench in the case of p.a. narayanan (supra) is no more a good law, considering the dictum of the apex court in the case of sanwarmal kejriwal (supra) (paras 21 and 22 thereof). he submits that the division bench was .....

Best Food International Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Com ...

Court : Mumbai

..... reliance upon the decision of the american court on which shri devitre placed great emphasis. therein, the american court had before it a case where two bills of lading for transportation of goods from australia to alabama were placed before the court. the claim was a maritime one but partially arising out of a train wreck. a shipment of machinery from australia ..... and nonmaritime contracts. in the case before it the court found that the primary objection is to accomplish the transportation of goods by sea from australia to the eastern coast of the united states. therefore, the things which are principally connected with maritime transportation being involved relying upon some passages brought to the notice of the court that the observations relied upon by .....

Mr. Nusli Neville Wadia Vs. the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Being a ...

Court : Mumbai

..... in the capacity as a persona designata and not as a court. our attention was invited to a judgment of the delhi high court in n.p. berry v. delhi transport corporation and anr. : 15 (1979) dlt 108. the learned division bench of the delhi high court after considering the scheme and the provisions of the public premises eviction act article ..... 329a(g) production, procurement, supply and distribution of food-stuffs (including edible oilseeds and oils) and such other goods as the president may, by public notification, declare to be essential goods for the purpose of this article and control of prices of such goods;'[(h) rent, its regulation and control and tenancy issues including the right, title and interest of landlords and tenants .....

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

..... of relevance to us, deals with the allotment or reservation of land for roads, open spaces, gardens, recreation grounds, schools, markets, green belts and dairies, transport facilities and public purposes of all kinds. sections 19 and 20 are more or less on the earlier pattern, dealing with the disputed ownership and right of entry ..... in the bill having common physical social and economic problems so that certain matters such as distribution of population and industries, roads and highways, preservation of good agricultural lands, reservation of green belts and preservation of areas of natural scenery, etc., can be dealt with and planned comprehensively on a regional level. ..... by the law and judiciary department. on a careful conspectus of the facts, we are unable to uphold the contention of mr. venugopal that 'public good' has been advanced by the illegal action of the state government.91. another issue which needs attention while considering whether public interest has been advanced, is .....

Shri Chandrahas D. Chodankar Vs. the State of Goa (Through the Secreta ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR164; 2008(6)BomCR789; (2008)110BOMLR2621; 2009(2)MhLj56

..... 1999 modified the punishment of dismissal from service and substituted it by compulsory retirement.3. at the relevant time, the petitioner was serving as asst. director of transport, transport department of government of goa. he joined the services in 1975 as assistant motor vehicle inspector on ad hoc basis and thereafter was promoted on 16.11.1984 ..... the rival contentions, firstly, it is necessary to consider the factual position.23. it is undisputed before us that the petitioner was working as assistant director of transport, directorate of transport, government of goa and at the relevant time he was posted at mapusa. further, it is undisputed that he was the 'registering authority' within the ..... disciplinary action can be taken in the following cases:i) where the officer had acted in a manner as would reflect on his reputation for integrity or good faith or devotion to duty;ii) if there is prima facie material to show recklessness or misconduct in the discharge of his duty;iii) if he had .....

Geetanjali Woollen Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M.V. X-press Annapurna and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR31

..... of taking over of liability and that till and until the said liability is discharged, the plaintiff will not be entitled to obtain a bill of lading for the goods put on transport by sea being the suit consignment. this issue has also been raised by the defendant no. 1 and 4 and defendant no. 2 while contesting the matter on ..... were prepared and were cleared by the customs authorities at bombay and consequently the said two containers were handed over to the defendant no. 3 for the purpose of transportation of the said goods and the 3rd defendant issued three mate receipts bearing no. 2905, 2906 and 2907 all dated 1.4.1998. according to the 3rd defendant the said mate ..... are supplied. in the present case we are dealing with different situation. here is the case where the goods are lost by virtue of non-issuacne of bill of lading. the business of the 1st defendant vessel is to transport the goods by sea and normally as a matter of course the ship owner is entitled to book the said cargo .....