Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 1 preliminary Page 1 of about 780 results (0.258 seconds)

Liverpool and London S.P. and I Asson. Ltd. Vs. M.V. Sea Success I and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(9)SC218; 2003(10)SCALE1; (2004)9SCC512

..... been placed on the inland vessels act, 1917 (as amended in the year 1977), the merchant shipping act, 1956 (as amended in 1983) and multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (as amended in 2000) and in that view of the matter the pedantic and regressive view should be discouraged specially in the light of ..... from time to time. [see national insurance co. ltd., chandigarh v. nicolletta rohtagi and ors.].71. the multimodal transportation of goods (amendment) act 2000 inter alia provides for responsibilities and liabilities of the multimodal transport operator. by reason of act 44 of 2000 a proviso has been added. section 5 of the said act ..... 5. in section 7 of the principal act, in sub-section (1), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:- 'provided that the multimodal transport operator shall issue the multimodal transport document only after obtaining and during the subsistence of a valid insurance cover.' circulars:72. the insurance association has issued a circular dated 20th .....

Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories Vs. Stalco Freight International Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR134; II(2006)BC459; 2005(6)BomCR829

..... of lading that the court at united arab emirates will have exclusive jurisdiction?5. whether the suit is within the period of limitation under the terms of multimodal transportation of goods act 1993?6. whether the plaintiffs prove that the defendants are liable/responsible to deliver the cargo to the consignee directly despite the fact that the ..... suit. it has been thereafter contended that the suit is barred by law of limitation under the provisions of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993. it has been contended that the contract is governed by the said multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 and, therefore, the suit ought to have been filed within nine months from the accrual of cause ..... it is the case of the plaintiff that the said cargo was stuffed into f.c.l. container bearing no. apls 279834 and in respect of transportation of the said goods, the 2nd respondent issued a bill of lading no. mum/yer/0317 dated 25.3.2001 at mumbai. it is the case of the plaintiffs that .....

S.K. Networks Company Ltd. Vs. Amulya Exports Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2007Bom15; 2007(3)BomCR458

..... reproducing clause 6 of the rules of bill of lading. this act further provides and deals with multimodal transport contract and transport operator and determine also along with other sea act and other acts. the liability and responsibility is of multimodal transport operators for loss of damage to the goods. it further simplifies the procedure with a view to reducing and eliminating interpretation in the continuous ..... of trade, commerce and business at national or international level.23. the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (act 28 of 1993) came into force on 16th october, 1992 which provides for regulation of the multimodal transportation of goods from any place in india to a place outside india, on the basis of multimodal transport contract and for a matter connected there with. this act of 28 of .....

M.V. sea Success I Vs. Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and I ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR537

..... for a vessel. he referred to the inland vessels act, 1917 (amendment in 1977), the merchant shipping act, 1956 (amendment in 1983) and the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 (amendment in 2000) to show the trend of domestic legislation in india towards making insurance compulsory and mandatory for ships and ..... multimodal transport operators and submitted that there is no good reason for holding that insurance is not necessary by following restricted view of english courts. mr. pratap submitted that the provisions of 1999 ..... durban in the context of ranking of claims against a fund comprising of sale proceeds of the vessel m.v. 'emrald transporter.'16. article 1(k) of 1952 brussels arrest convention which incorporates 'goods or materials wherever supplied to a ship for her operation or maintenance' as a maritime claim came to be considered by .....

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2001Cal213,(2001)2CALLT445(HC)

..... namely indian law will apply. the learned counsel submitted that in so far as indian law is concerned, namely the indian carriage of goods by sea act, 1925 has been amended by multi modal transportation of goods act, 1993 [hereinafter called. cgsa]. relying on clause 3(c) of article iii of cgsa of 1925, the learned counsel submitted ..... 'however, proof to the contrary shall not be admissible if the bill of ladinghas been transferred to a third party acting in good faith' has come by way of amendment to cgsa by the multi modal transportation of goods act, 1993 [act 28 of' 1993]. 28. before dealing with the rival submissions, this court proposes first to deal with ..... that after receiving the goods in his charge, the carrier or the master or the agent of the carrier shall, on demand of the shipper, .....

Punjab Metal Works (P) Ltd. Vs. Pareekh Marine Agencies Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... dispute arising hereunder or in connection herewith shall be determined by the courts in seoul and no other courts . (iv) contract of carriage is governed by the provisions of the multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993 which has an overriding effect over all other enactments. (v) the complaint has been filed well beyond the period of nine months, as prescribed by the ..... multimodal transportation of goods act and is therefore barred by limitation. (vi) the entire claim under the petition has arisen under the combined transport document issued admittedly by the principal of the op, cho yang co. ltd., who has, since 11th september, 2001, been .....

M/S Rare Earth Overseas Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... that a provision as in section 103 of the railways act, is also to be found in the carriage of goods by road act, 2007, multimodal transportation of goods act, 1993, the carriage by air act, 1972 and the carriage of goods by sea act, 1925. the supreme court in nath bros. exim international ltd. vs. best roadways ltd. (2000 ..... petitioner, executing an export order placed by its foreign client based at ukraine, had on 9th april, 2010 deposited goods with the warehouse of the respondent situated at export warehouse, icd, tughlakabad, new delhi in order to transport the goods through the respondent to port of loading in the ships at mumbai port; (iii) that as per the ..... practice, the petitioner had also deposited the invoice shipping bills for export and packing list showing the value of the goods deposited as rs.6,06,282.75 paise; .....

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Another, Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1238; AIR1995Delhi323; II(1995)BC42; [1998]92CompCas849(Delhi)

..... the bill concerns the consignment of lubricated oil sent by first defendant at delhi to its customer defendant no. 2 at lucknow through the third defendant, a transporter. the bill is not honoured by the second defendant when presented for the first time. there is a great deal of correspondence between the bank, the ..... first and second defendants, and ultimately the bank instructs the third defendant, the transporter, to re-book the consignment to delhi. the third defendant informs the bank that the goods are lying undelivered at its u.p. border office, and the third defendant makes a claim against the bank for ..... rs. 'y' on account of transportation charges, demurrage/storage charges. the transporter also raises its counter-claim against defendants 1 and 2. various .....

Assam Leather Industry Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... minute in english typing.10.staff car driver-holding analogous post or peons with five years regular service with experience of driving cars/ van and having licence from transport authority.' 76. no such notification was produced before me, save and except the note from registrar. learned counsel could not throw any light regardingsource of this ..... is to find out whether the legislation squarely falls in one or the other entry. if a particular legislation is covered by any specific entry well and good. if it does not, the second question would be is it beyond the legislative competence of parliament in undertaking this exercise it is quite often known ..... company' as follows : ''banking company' means any company which transacts the business of banking in india. explanation.--any company which is engaged in the manufacture of goods or carries on any trade and which accepts deposits of money from the public merely for the purpose of financing its business as such manufacturer or trader shall .....

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

..... to say.-- (a)... (b)... (c) proposals for designation of areas for open spaces, playgrounds, stadia, zoological gardens, green belts, nature reserves, sanctuaries and dairies; (d) transport and communications, such as roads, high-ways, park-ways, railways, water-ways, canals and air ports, including their extension and development; (e) water supply, drainage, sewerage, ..... permitted to reduce the amenities under the d.c. regulations without adequately and fully compensating the residents/purchasers of the regular part of the structure for good reasons to be recorded in writing by the commissioner. (e) that the final order allowing retention must reflect application of mind as regards the ' ..... development plan. the d'souza committee report on the draft development plan 1981 to 2001 inter alia stated as follows:4.03 nearly as good an example of the perverse effect of unrealistic standards is the first development plan's excessive freeze of land under reservations for amenities that could .....