Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... to the respondent to file a fresh complaint for challenging the order of dismissal dated 10.07.2010 and the time spent in litigation post dismissal be considered as a good ground for condonation of delay. 17. the petitioner/ corporation has no objection in the light of the law that the respondent cannot be rendered remedyless and can challenge the dismissal ..... of thirty days from today, time spent by the respondent/ employee before the industrial court from 20.09.2010 till the decision in this petition, shall be considered as a good ground for condonation of delay on an application which the respondent shall file along with the complaint. 20. in the light of the above, this writ petition is partly allowed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... of section 61. 8. in this connection, we may take notice of the view expressed by a learned single judge of the madras high, court in south arcot cooperative motor transport society, ltd. (for ex-servicemen) v. syed batcha and others (2) where dealing with an industrial claim, the learned judge held: "therefore, in regard to an industrial claim, like the ..... transfer, (1) rules relating to departmental enquiry against employees for misconduct, (11) probationary period and confirmation, (12) working hours and overtime allowance, (13) age of retirement,, (14) security, (15) common good fund, (16) service conditions and (17) promotions. the second and the third issues both related to the question whether the transfers of some employees of two of the banks, the .....
Tag this Judgment!