Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 1 preliminary Court: mumbai Page 2 of about 61 results (0.114 seconds)

Nov 02 2001 (HC)

Mangesh Janardhan Mohite (President) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR660; 2002(5)BomCR653

..... at 4 f.s.i. this is because every steep vertical rise will lead to extreme pressure on the horizontal services. all facilities like water, electric supply, transportation, fire-fighting etc. will come under severe pressure. this is also because these buildings are supposed to come up in the highly congested are of south bombay. ..... unfortunately party to this happening. they are also the suffers. for that matter, their expectations were not unjust in any manner. they expect a quick and good construction and they were apprehensive that the same will not be provided by mhada. government should take care of these apprehensions when this new construction comes up. ..... repair board that certain commitment had been made in the earlier public interest litigation, that 133 more tenements would become available in the present scheme and that good number of steps, including calling of tenders for the construction of the transit building, had already been taken. inspite of this, the vice-president of mhada .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1992 (HC)

Commercial Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1993]201ITR348(Bom)

..... was responsible even when bulk supplies were made directly to the consumer. the distributor had to pay against documents of dispatch of goods. the goods were consigned to the consumer's place and the transport documents were taken in the name of 'self' and endorsed to the distributor. if the documents were not retired within the ..... no person could acquire or purchase coal from a colliery except under an authorisation from the central government. a question arose as to when the colliery supplied goods directly to the purchaser, karsandas, through the agents by, billing them and then ratilal vadilal made sales to karsandas with commission, whether there was a second ..... time set, the distributor was made to bear insurance charges for goods. the distributor was otherwise entitled to a rebate. in the matter of construction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1994 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gangavarapur Padmawati and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996ACJ45

..... the hirer of the vehicle carried free of charge or a police officer in uniform travelling on duty may be carried in a goods vehicle, the total number of persons so carried (i) in light transport goods vehicle having registered laden weight less than 990 kg., not more than one; (ii) in any other light ..... transport goods vehicle, not more than three; (iii) in any goods vehicle other than light transport vehicle, not more than seven.(2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), ..... but subject to the provisions of sub-rules (4) and (5) a regional transport authority may by an order in writing permit that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1996 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gajanan S/O Rambhau Mohite

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR73

..... reward, or(b) for organised racing and speed testing, or(c) for a purpose not allowed by the permit under which the vehicle is used, where the vehicle is a transport vehicle, or(d) without side-car being attached where the vehicle is a motor cycle, or (ii) a condition excluding driving by a named person or persons or by any ..... case, the tractor und trolly were carrying the marriage party. the tractor and trolly were insured for the purposes of agricultural operations and as per rules for carrying of own goods only. the specific column in the motor policy speaks:carrying on or engaged in the business or occupation agri. foresty & as per rule carriage of own ..... goods only of and no other for the purpose of this insurance.in the case of oriental fire and general insurance co. ltd., goa (cited supra), considering various provisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2015 (HC)

Riddhisiddhi Bullions Limited and Others Vs. Union of India, through C ...

Court : Mumbai

..... 2014, the petitioners submitted various details to the office of the respondent no.3 with documentary evidence of time and negotiation, and delivery of shipment for further transportation to india. it was placed on record that the consignments covered vide the subject two bills of entry, were cleared by the customs authorities after verification and ..... then by sub-section (4) of section 3 it is stated that no permit or licence shall be necessary for the import or export of any goods nor any goods shall be prohibited for import or export, except as may be required under the act of 1992, or rules or orders made thereunder. section 5 says ..... central government for the development and regulation of foreign trade, by, inter alia, making provisions for prohibiting, restricting or otherwise regulating the import or export of goods. section 5 of the act permits central government to formulate and notify foreign trade policy, and also to amend the same by issuing notifications in the official .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2016 (HC)

Creative Tours and Travels (India) Private Limited Vs. Intellectual Pr ...

Court : Mumbai

..... accordingly, issued a registration certificate. the petitioner claims that they have all the licenses and authorizations and, equally, they are claiming accreditations from the international air transport association (iata). they are also claiming that they had a sub-registration under the bombay shops and establishments act, 1948. the predecessor and, equally, the ..... provision contemplates applications by different proprietors for registration of trade marks which are identical or nearly resemble each other in respect of the same goods or description of goods. the competition there contemplated is amongst proprietors whose marks are not on the register and is not limited to cases in which a ..... that compliance therewith would involve undue complexity and that the addition or antedating, as the case may be, would not affect any substantial quantity of goods or services and would not substantially prejudice the rights of any person. (2) a proposal so to amend the register shall be brought to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2016 (HC)

Anil (Vidyarthi) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra Represented by t ...

Court : Mumbai

..... size at the lowest level on a rational basis keeping in mind the size of population, the needs of social and economic development, availability of resources, the transport and communication facilities, convenience of administration and other relevant factors. ... what is further forgotten is that over the years, not only the population in the ..... it is common knowledge that the needs of the people change with the development in the economic, scientific and technological fields as also with the developments in transport and communication. with them, the concept of self-sufficiency and the means, mode and range of self-governance also change. what is more, the units of ..... provisions and which ensure purity and sanctity of the election process concluded, whether directly or directly, are inserted so as to uphold larger public interest and public good. it must be remembered that by part ixa the municipalities have been given a constitutional status. articles 243-p, 243-q and 243-r all ensure .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2003 (TRI)

The Icici Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit, Special Range 36

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... of the asset has been given in favour of rseb which is normally given. rseb has been made liable to the assessee for any loss or damage occurring during transportation, delivery, etc. which is contrary to the legal position that a lessee would be liable for the loss only while the asset is in his possession. since the ..... 19(2), only then can the set of rules prescribed for the purpose in sections 20 to 24 can be applied. section 2(14) defines "specific" goods or "ascertained" goods as goods which have been identified and agreed upon by the parties. in the assessee's case, the two high efficiency boilers have been identified and agreed upon by ..... by itself decide the issue. the decisive issue is whether there was an intention on the part of the parties to really convey and require the property in the goods. their intention is to be gathered from surrounding circumstances. these would include the negotiations held between the parties in the initial stages and during the pre-documentation period .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2014 (HC)

Perma Container (Uk) Line Limited and Another Vs. Perma Container Line ...

Court : Mumbai

..... facts for the purpose of deciding these two petitions are as under:- 2. the claimant company is registered under the laws of england, united kingdom and carries on business of transporting cargo in containers. respondent is a company registered under the provisions of the indian companies act, 1956. the respondent was registered on 6th july, 2004 with an authorised share capital ..... , as we now see, was not the case that he had to meet. he never had a fair chance to meet that case. 24. accordingly, i find that there is good ground for applying the provision that recognition or enforcement of the award may be refused. mr flannery has emphasised that the provision says may , and submitted that this court has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2003 (TRI)

Mid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)87ITD537(Mum.)

..... of the asset has been given in favour of rseb which is normally given. rseb has been made liable to the assessee for any loss of damage occurring during transportation, delivery, etc. which is contrary to the legal position that a lessee would be liable for the loss only while the asset is in his possession. since the ..... 19(2), only then can the set of rules prescribed for the purpose in sections 20 to 24 can be applied. section 2(14) defines "specific" goods or "ascertained" goods as goods which have been identified and agreed upon by the parties. in the assessee's case, the two high efficiency boilers have been identified and agreed upon by ..... by itself decide the issue. the decisive issue is whether there was an intention on the part of the parties to really convey and acquire the property in the goods. their intention is to be gathered from surrounding circumstances. these would include the negotiations held between the parties in the initial stages and during the pre-documentation period .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //