Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mizoram university act 2000 section 5 powers of the university Sorted by: old Page 5 of about 190 results (0.139 seconds)

Dr. Mohammad Afzal Khan Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2002J& K36

..... authority thereto. the said d.n. kaul though a necessary party, is not arrayed as party to the writ.7. the two authorities cited by petition-ers-counsel viz.. marathwada university v. seshrao balwant rao chavan (1989] 3 scc 132 : (air 1989 sc 1582) and naseem bano v. state of u.p., 1993 supp (4) scc 46 : ..... to grant permission shall also be deemed under law to have the power to add, amend/ alter or rescind it. to say that the authority under the act after giving the permission becomes functus officio. irrespective of imperativeness and requirement of a given situation meriting immediate remedial measures and that too in the present day environment ..... of said permission order. the said d.n. kaul was therefore, asked to submit fresh proposal which was processed and considered and after following due procedure under the act and regulation, a decision was taken thereto in december, 1998. it is found that no orders whatsoever have been issued or communicated to concerned including the said d. .....

Dr. R.R. Patil and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant211; ILR2002KAR300; 2003(4)KarLJ331

..... any other person carrying on the activity of imparting education in medicine or engineering leading to a degree conferred by a university established under the karnataka state universities act. 1976 (karnataka act no. 28 of 1976) and any other educational institution, or class of such institution as the government may. by notification. specify;(e) government seats ..... of the orders of hon'ble high court which may be passed in due course.11. subsequently, in a later affidavit dated 11-12-2000 filed by the registrar of the respondent university, he has stated that so far no seats have been allotted to my candidate in medical and dental p.g. courses either in ..... education has a direct impact on maintenance of standards of such education (see: dr. preeti srivastava's case : air1999sc2894 (supra) para 46 & vci's case : [2000]1scr43 (supra) (para 16)(ii) the power to co-ordinate under en-try 66 means harmonising or bringing into proper relation in which all the things so coordinated participate .....

Balubhai G. Makwana Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)4GLR2940

..... the affidavit-in-reply, and i have also considered the authorities relied upon by the respective parties. the supreme court decision in the case of gujarat agricultural university (supra) relied upon by the petitioner does not help the petitioner in this wise that the scheme was framed in that case and it was observed by ..... 3 has also placed reliance on the decision of this court in the case of deputy executive engineer, gujarat maritime board v. hasmukh m. jasani reported in : (2000)1glr367 , wherein certain guidelines were laid down by this court, which are as under:7. ....(i) the nature of appointment, whether for a fixed period or otherwise ..... relevant considerations and made recommendations in the interest of rationalisation. the decision is based on administrative and financial considerations. there is nothing wrong in the societies having acted on the policy decision of the state government. really speaking there was hardly anything left to be done by the d.r.d.a. societies at their .....

Anjuman-e-islamiah, Kurnool Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD501; 2002(3)ALT505

..... the rights conferred in article 30(1).11. in lily kurianv. s.r. lewina, : [1979]1scr820 , in exercise of the powers conferred by the kerala university act 14 of 1957, ordinance 33(4) was framedproviding for an appeal to the vice-chancellor against any order passed by the management in respect of the penalties mentioned ..... public and that the interest justifying interference could only be the interest of the minority concerned.12. the apex court in gandhi faiz-am college v. agra university, : [1975]3scr810 , held as under:'from the aforesaid rulings, it is clear that the minority has not only a fundamental right to establish but also ..... rule 15(3), which imposes the conditions for including the representatives on the selection committee, is also illegal. it is also submitted that when the s.v. university, tirupathi directed the present society to include two of its representatives in the selection committee of lecturers in the osmania college, kurnool, which is established and maintained .....

Mahatama Gandhi National Institute of Medical Sciences Vs. State of Ra ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj884

..... one desirous of starting an institution purely for the purposes of educating the students could do so but sections 22 & 23 of the university grants commission act which prohibits the award of degrees except by a university must be kept in mind.'as regards third question, the apex court (per mohan,j.) held as under:-'76. applying these tests, ..... they did not opt for payment seats obviously because for state medical colleges, student taking admission to mbbs course is required to pay approx. annual fee at rs. 2000/- as against in private medical college like the petitioner institute even of free seat at annual fee of rs. 60,000/- due to hostal accommodation having been ..... for free/merit and payment seats in private medical colleges will be as notified by the state government in view of letter no. mci 34(41)2000-med/dated 30.12.2000.'15. for the present controversy, significant and relevant clause of ordinance 272 is clause v which pertains to interview by admission and allotment of place of .....

Laxman Das Vs. Deoji Mal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj74; 2002(4)WLC297; 2002(4)WLN664

..... ; (air 1998 sc 703), subash chander sharma v. state of punjab, (1999) 5 scc 171 : (air 1999 sc 2076); bharathidasan university v. all india council for technical education (2001) 8 scc 676 : (air 2001 sc 2861); and mor modern co-operative transport society ..... . saldanna, air 1980 sc 326, a. k.roy v. state of punjab, (1986) 4 scc 326 ;(air 1986 sc 2160); state of mizoram v.biakchhawna, (1995) 1 scc 156 : (1995 airscw 1497); j. n. ganatra v. morvi municipality morvi, air 1996 sc 2520; babuverghese ..... original suit relates to eviction of the tenant under the provisions of the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) act, 1950, whatever the judgment and decree to be passed by the learned trial court shall be appealable and the affidavit ..... 8 scc 266 : (air 1999 sc 3558); haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharashtra, (2000) 6 scc 179 : (air 2000 sc 2281); delhi administration v. gurdip singh, (2000) 7 scc 296 : (air 2000 sc 3737); dhananjaya reddy v. state of karnataka, (2001) 4 scc 9 : (air .....

Pup Thangchhuana and anr. Vs. the North Eastern Hill University and or ...

Court : Guwahati

..... any further, it needs to be noted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the mizoram university act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') came into force with effect from 20.4.2000, which was the date of publication of the act aforementioned in the official gazette. sections 6, 7 and 33 of the act read as under :'6. on and from the commencement of this ..... of the petitioners before this court, at the time of hearing, are incorrect. what he has submitted is that with the coming into force of the 2000 act, the petitioners have become employees of the mizoram university and if they are found fit for being giving reliefs, then, the same may be done without adversely affecting the promotion of the private respondents.10. upon .....

State of Mizoram and anr. Vs. Vatech Escher Wiss Flovel Ltd.

Court : Guwahati

..... action as suggested by it. referring to the impugned judgment and order, the learned advocate general, mizoram, submitted that the learned single judge having concluded that there was no material to hold that the state respondents had acted irrationally by not allowing the respondent-writ petitioner to participate and that there was nothing to infer ..... that of m/s jyoti limited for settlement of the contract, relating to execution of the project. the learned counsel strenuously urged that as per the universally accepted, norms relating to two pails bids system any modification in the techno commercial offer was bound to have a bearing on the financial offer and, therefore ..... prevalent facts interference by way of judicial review is not contemplated.14. the apex court in air india limited v. cochin international airport limited, and ors., (2000) 2 scc 617, paragraph 7 whereof has been extracted in its extenso by the learned single judge had, inter alia, observed that the state can choose its .....

Sapthagiri Educational Trust rep. by Its Chairman, M. Jothiprakasam, V ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ358

..... senior counsel contended that ncte did not formulate any regulation on the basis of the judgment in unnikrishnan's case and it was the university grants commission which had formulated regulations in terms of unnikrishnan's case. ncte act had prescribed only norms and standards for teacher education institutions and did not visualise interference with the process of admission.10. mr. n ..... to be examined as against the provisions under all india council for technical education act and it was held that de-recognition by the state government or disaffiliation by the universities on grounds inconsistent with the central act would be inoperative and that the central act should prevail.14. the rights of various types of educational institutions viz., minority and non-minority institutions, aided .....

Chhatrapal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2634

..... held that a judgment may not be followed in a given case if it has some distinguishing features.22. in bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill (p) ltd.. : air2003sc511 , the hon'ble supreme court held that a decision is an ..... j.a.c. saldanna air 1980 sc 327; a.k, roy and am. v. state of punjab and ors. : 1986crilj2037 ; state of mizoram v. biakchhawna : (1995)1scc156 ; j.n. ganatra v. morvi municipality, morvi : air1996sc2520 ; babu verghese and ors., v. bar council of ..... ors. : air1999sc3558 ; haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharashtra and ors. : air2000sc2281 ; delhi administration v. gurdip singh and ors. : (2000)7scc296 ; dhanajaya reddy v. state of karnataka etc. etc., (2001) 4 scc 9 and commissioner of income tax, mumbai v. anjum m ..... , especially when the literal reading produces an intelligible result. the court cannot aid the legislatures defeating phrasing of an act or add or mend, and by construction, make up deficiencies which arc there.'9. similarly, in siddappa vasappa kuri .....