Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mizoram university act 2000 section 5 powers of the university Sorted by: old Court: guwahati Page 1 of about 7 results (0.041 seconds)

Sep 07 1989 (HC)

Heramba Kumar Sarma and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... sought to have the nineteenth amendment declared unconstitutional. in massachusetts v. mellon, (1922) 67 law ed 1078, the challenge of the federal maternity act was not entertained although made by the commonwealth on behalf of all its citizens. 6. the court will not pass upon the constitutionality of a ..... section 37 which authorises the central. government to provide by order for removal of doubts or difficulties in giving effect to the provisions of the act, in our judgment, delegates legislative power which is not permissible. condition of the applicability of section 37 is the arising of the doubt or ..... university, and two boards -- assam state higher secondary council and central board of secondary education. these two institutions are the bodies which hold examination for higher secondary education. applicants from these institutions are for 85% seats. besides candidates from nehu can apply, candidates from meghalaya can apply, candidates from arunachal pradesh can apply and mizoram .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2001 (HC)

Pachhunga University College and anr. Vs. North Eastern Hill Universit ...

Court : Guwahati

..... the relevant clauses from the deed of agreement: 'and whereas the jurisdiction of the university extends to the states of meghalaya, nagaland and the union territories of arunachal pradesh and mizoram (vide section 1 (2) of north eastern hill university act, 1973, hereinafter referred to asthe act) ; and whereas the university has expressed the possibility and desirability of having a constituent college at, aizawl as a ..... pace-setting institution and also a university campus for opening university departments at aizawl to meet the aspirations and the logs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2003 (HC)

Pup Thangchhuana and anr. Vs. the North Eastern Hill University and or ...

Court : Guwahati

..... any further, it needs to be noted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the mizoram university act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') came into force with effect from 20.4.2000, which was the date of publication of the act aforementioned in the official gazette. sections 6, 7 and 33 of the act read as under :'6. on and from the commencement of this ..... of the petitioners before this court, at the time of hearing, are incorrect. what he has submitted is that with the coming into force of the 2000 act, the petitioners have become employees of the mizoram university and if they are found fit for being giving reliefs, then, the same may be done without adversely affecting the promotion of the private respondents.10. upon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2003 (HC)

State of Mizoram and anr. Vs. Vatech Escher Wiss Flovel Ltd.

Court : Guwahati

..... action as suggested by it. referring to the impugned judgment and order, the learned advocate general, mizoram, submitted that the learned single judge having concluded that there was no material to hold that the state respondents had acted irrationally by not allowing the respondent-writ petitioner to participate and that there was nothing to infer ..... that of m/s jyoti limited for settlement of the contract, relating to execution of the project. the learned counsel strenuously urged that as per the universally accepted, norms relating to two pails bids system any modification in the techno commercial offer was bound to have a bearing on the financial offer and, therefore ..... prevalent facts interference by way of judicial review is not contemplated.14. the apex court in air india limited v. cochin international airport limited, and ors., (2000) 2 scc 617, paragraph 7 whereof has been extracted in its extenso by the learned single judge had, inter alia, observed that the state can choose its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2005 (HC)

Hrangthanmawii Vs. Lai Autonomous District Council and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... a person other than her. it is the contention of the petitioner that though the academic qualification for the post of aeo is a graduate of a recognized university, the dpc recommended the respondent no. 5, who is merely a matriculate, for the said post. the council-respondents accepted the recommendation and thereupon promoted the respondent ..... prays for quashing the orders promoting the respondent nos. 4 and 5 to the posts of assistant education officer in the office of the lai autonomous district council, mizoram and for directing the respondents-council to 'remote her to the said post w.e.f 10.4.2002.2. to appreciate the controversy involved in the writ ..... not arise). the dpc reconsidered the matter and again recommended the promotion of the petitioner vide the proceeding dated 11.7.2002. the recommendation was not again not acted upon. thereupon, the petitioner filed another representation to the council-respondents on 29.1.2003, when no action was taken, this writ petition was filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2007 (HC)

Pachhunga University College Teachers' Association and Anr. Vs. North ...

Court : Guwahati

..... (1) of the mizoram university act, every person who immediately before the commencement of the act was holding or discharging the duties of any post or ..... now let us see the status of the pucta, after formation of the mizoram university at aizawl vis-a-vis the agreement dated 19.4.79, referred to above. the central government enacting the mizoram university act, 2000 established central university known as mizoram university at aizawl w.e.f. 2.7.01. in terms of section 33 ..... is difficult to accept in view of the discussion held hereinabove relating to recruitment of lecturers of the pachhunga college, after establishment of the mizoram university act.18. the agreement in question was arrived at by the competent authorities having jurisdiction and power to make such agreement and the said jurisdictional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2013 (HC)

The President, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi and ...

Court : Guwahati

..... .m., dr. verma went to the toilet. while returning to the meeting room he met a winter school trainee, dr. robin gogoi, (scientist, assam agricultural university, jorhat) in the corridor and started exchanging pleasantries with him. all of sudden dr. sarveshwar dayal and dr.(mrs.) yash gupta waylaid dr. verma in the corridor ..... while working as scientist(ss), national research centre for mushroom, solan, dr.(mrs.) yash gupta created an embarrassing and intolerable situation by indulging herself in an act of gross indiscipline and violence by instigating and provoking dr. sarveshwar dayal, scientist(ss), who had physically assaulted dr. r.n. verma, ex-director of ..... is also not identical. for example, in a criminal trial, the court invariably proceeds on the presumption that accomplice evidence is suspect and shall not be acted upon without an independent corroboration in material particulars. an enquiry officer is not bound by any such rule. in a criminal proceeding, proof is required beyond .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2014 (HC)

Punal Kumar Das, Barpeta and Others Vs. The State of Assam, Represente ...

Court : Guwahati

..... referred to in the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no.11, as per the provisions of section 5 of the karnataka state universities act, 2000, the benefit of the distance mode of education is permissible and in fact, the university has been offering the same by obtaining the institutional recognition in 2007-2008, the bsc(it), m.sc(it) and b.sc(itim ..... , the petitioners having obtained the degree in 2012, the same is valid in the eye of law. 25. section 55 of the karnataka state university act, 2000, providing for jurisdiction, admission to privileges etc lays down that the act shall be exercised in the university area and no educational institution beyond the said area shall be associated with or admitted to any privileges of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 2014 (HC)

H. Lalropianga and Others Vs. Mizoram University and Others

Court : Guwahati

..... the recommendation for the appointment of ldcs. being aggrieved with the actions of the respondents in cancelling their recommendation for appointment to the post of ldc in the mizoram university, the petitioners have filed the present writ petition. 2. heard mr. a. r. malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as mr. ..... appointments. thereafter, the respondents had issued offer of appointment to each of the petitioners to the post of lower division clerk in the ministerial service of mizoram university, aizawl by offer letter dated 26.6.2013. all the petitioners accordingly submitted their acceptance letter to the offer of appointment made by the respondents. ..... , found those complaints to be well founded on a enquiry got made in that regard, we are unable to find that the chandigarh administration had acted either arbitrarily or without bona fide and valid reasons in cancelling such dubious select list. hence, the contentions of the learned counsel for the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 2014 (HC)

H. Lalropianga and Others Vs. Mizoram University and Others

Court : Guwahati

..... the recommendation for the appointment of ldcs. being aggrieved with the actions of the respondents in cancelling their recommendation for appointment to the post of ldc in the mizoram university, the petitioners have filed the present writ petition. 2. heard mr. a. r. malhotra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as mr. ..... appointments. thereafter, the respondents had issued offer of appointment to each of the petitioners to the post of lower division clerk in the ministerial service of mizoram university, aizawl by offer letter dated 26.6.2013. all the petitioners accordingly submitted their acceptance letter to the offer of appointment made by the respondents. ..... , found those complaints to be well founded on a enquiry got made in that regard, we are unable to find that the chandigarh administration had acted either arbitrarily or without bona fide and valid reasons in cancelling such dubious select list. hence, the contentions of the learned counsel for the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //