Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mizoram university act 2000 section 5 powers of the university Sorted by: old Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 4 results (0.103 seconds)

Chhatrapal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2634

..... held that a judgment may not be followed in a given case if it has some distinguishing features.22. in bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mill (p) ltd.. : air2003sc511 , the hon'ble supreme court held that a decision is an ..... j.a.c. saldanna air 1980 sc 327; a.k, roy and am. v. state of punjab and ors. : 1986crilj2037 ; state of mizoram v. biakchhawna : (1995)1scc156 ; j.n. ganatra v. morvi municipality, morvi : air1996sc2520 ; babu verghese and ors., v. bar council of ..... ors. : air1999sc3558 ; haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharashtra and ors. : air2000sc2281 ; delhi administration v. gurdip singh and ors. : (2000)7scc296 ; dhanajaya reddy v. state of karnataka etc. etc., (2001) 4 scc 9 and commissioner of income tax, mumbai v. anjum m ..... , especially when the literal reading produces an intelligible result. the court cannot aid the legislatures defeating phrasing of an act or add or mend, and by construction, make up deficiencies which arc there.'9. similarly, in siddappa vasappa kuri .....

Smt. Kesari Devi W/O Shri Gulab Singh, Chairman, Zila Panchayat Vs. St ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3563; 2005(3)ESC2209

..... u.p. government had framed a code in the shape of guidelines known as the uttar pradesh code of practice on access to information act, 2000. all government departments including local bodies are enjoined with the obligation to provide information to an individual including access to all such material to ensure ..... of maharashtra and ors., : air1999sc152 ; shashikant singh v. tarkeshwar singh, : 2002crilj2806 ; balwant singh and ors. v. anand kumar sharma and ors., : [2003]1scr653 ; bhavnagar university v. palitana sugar mills pvt. ltd. and ors., : air2003sc511 ; and chandrika prasad yadav v. state of bihar and ors., : air2004sc2036 ).75. in rubber house v. excellsior ..... state of bihar and anr. v. j.a.c. saldanna and ors., : 1980crilj98 , a.k. roy and anr. v. state of punjab and ors., : 1986crilj2037 ; state of mizoram v. biakchhawna, : (1995)1scc156 ; j.n. ganatra v. morvi municipality morvi, : air1996sc2520 ; and babu verghese and ors. v. bar council of kerala and ors., : [1999]1scr1121 .....

Prof. Ramesh Chandra, Vice Chancellor Bundelkhand University Vs. State ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3181

..... after examining the statutory provisions applicable therein, the court lime to the following conclusion:the power to appoint a vice chancellor has its source in the university act; investment of that power carries with it the power to determine the employment; but the power is coupled with duty. the power may not be exercised ..... ; state of bihar and ors. v. j.a.c. saldanna and ors. : 1980crilj98 , a.k. roy and anr. v. state of punjab and ors. : 1986crilj2037 ; state of mizoram v. biakchhawna : (1995)1scc156 ; j.n. ganatra v. morvi municipality mcrvi : air1996sc2520 ; babu verghese and ors. v. bar council of kerala and ors. : [1999]1scr1121 and chandra ..... preferred to above. a similar view has been reiterated in haresh dayaram thakur v. state of maharashtra and ors. : air2000sc2281 ; delhi administration v. gurdip singh uban and ors. : (2000)7scc296 ; dhanajaya reddy v. state of karnataka etc. etc. (2001) 4 scc 9; commissioner of income tax, mumbai v. anjum m.h. ghaswala and ors. : [2001] .....

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... they want to bring their arguments to their logical conclusion (thomas hardy in 'far from the mad ding crowd'). balance in nature is necessary for survival of the universe. similarly balance in society is also essential for its survival economic aspect is one of the most important aspects of human society. economic balance will have therefore to ..... aggrieved party in seeking this special remedy and what excuse there is for it.....it is not easy nor is it desirable to lay down any rule for universal application. it may however be stated as a general rule that if there has been unreasonable delay the court ought not ordinarily to lend its aid to ..... petition no.47068 of 2011 (permanand and others vs. state of u.p. and others), the petitioners have challenged the notification dated 18th september, 2000 issued under section 4 of the act proposing to acquire 56.4984 acres land of village chhapraula for planned industrial development. the petitioners claim to be owner and in possession of the plots .....