Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mizoram university act 2000 section 5 powers of the university Sorted by: old Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 3 results (0.503 seconds)

Suresh Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR274(Jhr)]

..... the nature sought by shri venugopal would be in clear transgression of the provisions of the university act and the regulations of the university. we cannot by our fiat direct the university to disobey the statute to which it owes its existence and the regulations made by the university itself. we cannot imagine anything more destructive of the rule of law than a direction by ..... the said provisi6n, learned additional government advocate submits that in view of the said provisions under the state act, the state government has competence to direct the examining authorities like the karnataka state secondary education examination board or the university established under the karnataka state universities act, 1976 to conduct examination for students of unaffiliated institutions/colleges. in my opinion, such a stand raised .....

Dilip Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(2)BLJR1059; [2005(2)JCR293(Jhr)]

..... under 'kameshwar stngh darbhanga sanskrit vishvidyalaya act, 1960 (bihar act 6 of 1960)'. subsequently, 'bihar state universities act, 1976' covered almost all the universities, situated within the territory of the state of bihar, except patna university, rajendra agriculture university and birsa agriculture university, for which separate acts were passed. under section 3 of the 'bihar state universities act, 1976, 'the establishment and incorporation of the universities' within the territory of the then ..... that the deputy director (secondary education), bihar, patna, having distorted the fact, had sent wrong information to the secretary, school examination board, patna by the aforesaid letter dated 29th march, 2000.the government of bihar through its education department while issued resolution no. 394 dated llth april, 1983, the subject was shown as 'regarding recognition of examination, conducted by sampurnand sanskrit .....

Upendra Nath Mahto Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... schedule shall apply to the administration and control of the scheduled areas and scheduled tribes in any state other than the states of assam, meghalaya, tripura and mizoram. 5 9. it would be apposite to refer to relevant provision of fifth schedule (part c) of the constitution of india, which are reproduced herein below ..... counter affidavit filed by the union of india. learned counsel for the petitioner has advanced his 7 argument on the power of judicial review by referring to 2000(1) scc168(para9) wherein the hon ble apex court has held inclusion of caste in the list of backward class cannot be done mechanically and without ..... in the constitution of india but have become well established. they embody principles followed in declaring (excluded) and partially excluded size in the government of india, act 1935 schedule b of recommendation of the excluded and partially excluded areas, subcommittee of constitution of assembly in the scheduled areas and scheduled tribe commission, 1961. the .....

Vishnu Kumar Bansal and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... presently residing at db 90a, lig dda flats, hari nagar, po & ps hari nagar new delhi 110064 7. ravindar kumar, s/o late shri sohan lal, presently residing at mizoram bhawan, q. no.2, chankyapuri, po & ps chankyapuri, new delhi 8. sushil minz, s/o late shri benedick minz, presently residing at block 22, q.no.601, ..... approached this court.2. facts leading to filing of this writ petition are, hereinafter, set out in detail. on formation of the state of jharkhand on 15.11.2000, a camp office of the chief minister was established at new delhi. separate offices for the resident commissioner and the chief executive officer were also established at jharkhand bhawan ..... the 16 appellants can never be categorised as an irregular appointment. the initial appointment of the appellants is made in accordance with the statutory procedure contemplated under the act. the decision to resort to such a procedure was taken at the highest level of the state by conscious choice as already noticed by us. 17. the .....