Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
..... the order of the controller dated 3rd may, 2006 in respect of specification no.191793 filed under patent application number 861/del/2000 on 25th september, 2000 which was opposed under section 25 existed before the patent (amendment) act, 2005 by m/s. newage laminators pvt. ltd. brief facts of the case 2. m/s. shriram institute of industrial ..... research whose credentials and observations are as follows 1. he was awarded the degree of m.sc. (physical chemistry) from the university of delhi in 1979 and was awarded the degree of ph.d. (applied chemistry) from the university of indian school of mines, in 1984. he joined india glycols ltd., kashipur, u.p. and worked as general manager ..... the manner as claimed in claim 1 or any other claim was neither known or used including prior to the date of said application, i.e. 25th september 2000. 47. the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that it is well settled in the patent law that an invention is considered known and/or anticipated only if .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
..... soil scientist, dev. manager 6.) dr. g. mustanhana reddy, dharwad, karnataka senior scientist, agricultural research station, dharwad university 7.) dr. jitendra yadav, hissar, haryana senior researcher, haryana agricultural university 8.) dr. sandeep bhakar, hissar, haryana haryana agricultural university 9.) dr. mrs. s. suryakumari, guntur, andhra pradesh senior scientist (hort) horticultural research station 10.) dr. sanjay ..... and 13 as originally filed. as mentioned previously, the composition of application no.40/mum/2007 is an agricultural composition while that of 655/mum/2000 is fungicidal composition. therefore, no one who has any skill in the art would even dream of using a fungicidal composition as a plant ..... the controller also did not allow the amendment relating to disclaimer up to 82% of the sulphur as it was not allowable u/s 59 of the act. 11. we have gone through the papers and the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant. 12. the original claims are : 1.) .....
Tag this Judgment!