Meritable - Judgment Search Results

Merit Magnum Constructions Vs. Nand Kumar Anant Vaity and Others

Court: Mumbai

and (d) In passing the impugned judgment and order, the learned Single Judge has virtually delved into the merits of the defence pleas raised by Defendant No4.1 and proceeded to return findings thereon. This is impermissible at

Merit Scada Automation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sanmar Industrial Systems Ltd. an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2005Mad19; II(2005)BC170; 2004(5)CTC81

temporary injunction, viz., prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of the first respondent/plaintiff-Company. Finding no merits, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.11163 of 2004 is also dismissed. -

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

113, is valid in law? 4.1. The learned Counsel Shri K.V.S. Bhaskara Rao, on behalf of the M/s. Merit Enterprises, appellant assessee submitted THAT: (a)The charging section for block assessment is Section 158BA(2) of the Income-tax Act,

State of A.P. and ors. Vs. Merit Enterprises and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1998)8SCC749

it is futile for it to be contending that the High Court travelled beyond its jurisdiction. Otherwise, on merit of the matter regarding ownership, nothing has been suggested to us whereupon we could be persuaded to take

Khursheed Anwar Mohammad Ali and Others Vs. Merit Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

P.C. : 1. The Notice of Motion is taken out by the Plaintiffs in a passing off suit, claiming appointment of Court Receiver for taking possession and control of the impugned goods and seeking a temporary...

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Merit Industries

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1979]43STC142(All)

C.S.P. Singh, J.1. The assessee deals in leather, leather belt and leather cutting. Leather belts were brought to tax at the rate of 6 per cent on the footing that they fall within the ambit of...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Merit Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(184)ELT197Tri(Chennai)

in favour of the importers and is relevant to the cases. In view of these, we find no merit in the Revenue's appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are rejected.

“9. After Having Heard Both the Sides I Find No Merit in Any of the ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

provisions with his valuable help and after considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, there is no merit in the instant petition in this context.9. Ex facie, the solitary argument of learned counsel that the impugned

for the Reasons Aforesaid I Find No Merit in This Second Appeal. Vs. B ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

reported to be inside Abadi Deh and far away from khaSr.No.1182. For the reasons aforesaid, I find no merit in this second appeal. Concurrent finding recorded by both the courts below to decree the suit of the

Plaintiffs Is Without Merits and Same Stands Dismissed.” Vs. Jinder ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the said suit cannot be consolidated with the other suit and the application of the plaintiffs is without merits and same stands dismissed.”. Khan Md.Firoz 2014.02.21 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document