Meaning - Judgment Search Results

Technology Development Board a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Te ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2007(4)KarLJ601

..... companies act 1956 1 of 1956 and banking company within the meaning of section 5 c of the banking regulation act 1949 10 ..... action although there is no statutory definition of negligence ordinary it would mean omission of duty caused either by omission to do something which ..... driver and owner would be jointly liable this however would not means that they are joint tort feasors in the strict sense of .....

Shakharamseth Employees Union a Registered and Recognised Union in Pal ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR239

..... in subject to the title being approved by our solicitors he must be taken to mean what he says that is to make a condition that solicitors of his own selection ..... person to whom a shop has been sold in clause 21 of rule 5 34 means a person whose bid has been provisionally accepted it is not possible to accept this .....

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, a Company Incorporated Under ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR736; 2008(1)ARBLR166(Bom); 2008(1)BomCR89; (2007)109BOMLR2440; 2008(2)MhLj542

..... as follows in paragraph 19 19 would therefore an award which is perverse or malafide meaning thereby suffering from legal malafides or arbitrary be allowed to be executed arbitrariness and malafides ..... 31st march 1996 and admittedly by that time 80 of the work was completed it means he had carried on that work and that too much beyond the agreed period of .....

Mukund Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Indian Companies Act, ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(2)ARBLR25(Bom); III(2005)BC95; 2005(2)BomCR21

..... contain an arbitration clause he submitted that if the offer is vague and no precise meaning could be attributed to it then it cannot be said that the parties were at ..... india council for technical education aicte is now well settled but that certainly does not mean that role of the state government and for that matter the university is without any .....

icici Bank Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 19 ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2005(105)FLR570]; (2005)IILLJ700Bom

r m s khandeparkar j 1 rule by consent the rule is made returnable forthwith heard the learned advocates for...

Bharat M. N(Sic) Vs. Mr. Satish Ashok Sabni(Sic) and National Stock Ex ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR936; 2003(3)ARBLR427(Bom); 2003(6)BomCR257; 2003(4)MhLj259

orderf i rebello j 1 by the present petition the petitioner impugns the award dated october 10 2001 whereby the...

Donaldson Vs. Means

Court: US Supreme Court

..... hobson of london in favor of t armstrong and indorsed successively by armstrong and by means the defendant that the bills were presented and noted for non acceptance on the 24th ..... it was proved that the father showed this letter to means as soon as possible after it was received and means repeatedly promised to remit the amount of the bills but the .....

Means Vs. Bank of Randall

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at randall in that state against c g means w w means and c h means co partners as c g means sons to recover 6 700 4 protest fees ..... of cattle which lyons desired to buy but he did not have the means lyons in company with patterson applied to bramwell the cashier and agent of ..... 146 u s 620 1892 u s supreme court means v bank of randall 146 u s 620 1892 means v bank of randall no 63 submitted december .....

Means Vs. Dowd

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of north carolina dismissing a bill brought by paul b means assignee in bankruptcy of charles g montgomery and charles d ..... the firm of montgomery dowd were adjudicated bankrupts and the appellant means was duly appointed their assignee in bankruptcy very soon afterwards ..... is for failing or insolvent debtors who have any considerable means on band and especially in cases where a mercantile business .....

Means Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... u s 469 u s 1058 1984 469 u s 1058 alvin means v united states no 83 6866 marvin roth v united states no 84 605 supreme .....