March - Judgment Search Results

Martinsburg and Potomac Railroad Co. Vs. March

Court: US Supreme Court

Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad Co. v. March - 114 U.S. 549 (1885) U.S. Supreme Court Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad Co. v. March, 114 U.S. 549

Date of Decision: March 31 2014 Vs. Date of Decision: March 31, 2014

Court: Punjab and Haryana

AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.10138 of 2014 in Criminal Appeal No.S-1371-SB of 2014 Date of decision: March 31, 2014 Nathi Ram and another ...Applicants-Appellants Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH Present:

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. De Marche Enrico

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2005)197CTR(All)394; [2005]278ITR89(All)

India with M/s J.K. Synthetics Ltd. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act on 25th March, 1985 on a total income of Rs. 1,35,440. The respondent-assessee had claimed that he is not liable to

The Commissioner of Income Tax-xvi Vs. Sh. March Francois Jean Soulacr ...

Court: Delhi

versus SH. PANKAJ SHAH ..... Respondent + ITA 528/2011 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI ..... Appellant versus SH. MARCH FRANCOIS JEAN SOULACROUP ..... Respondent ..Appearance Through: Mr. Rajiv Tyagi with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Gyanendra Sharma and

Date of Decision : March 19 2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.5918 of 2013 Date of Decision : March 19, 2013 Jaswant Singh ...PETITIONER versus State of Punjab and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE

Date of Decision: March 19, 2013 Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5952 OF 201.DATE OF DECISION: March 19, 2013 Sunaina Dhingra .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA

Challenge in This Appeal Is to the Award Dated March 22 Vs. Sheela and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

for respondent No.3 - Insurance Company. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Challenge in this appeal is to the Award dated March 22, 2011 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Palwal (for short `the Tribunal'), whereby, compensation of Rs.6,11,398/- along

Date of Decision: March 13, 2013 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A.NO.389 of 2012 in CWP No.16863 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 13 2013 Rajwinder Singh and another .......Appellants Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI,

Date of Decision:1st March, 2013 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4520 of 2013 Date of Decision:1st March, 2013 Raj Singh & others ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH

Date of Decision:1st March, 2013 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4525 of 2013 Date of Decision:1st March, 2013 Gobind & another ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.