Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Date of Decision: March 31 2014 Vs. Date of Decision: March 31, 2014

Date of Decision: March 31 2014 vs Date of Decision: March 31, 2014

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Mar 31, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1136108

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Date of Decision: March 31 2014

Respondent

Date of Decision: March 31, 2014

Excerpt

.....imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a fine of rs.500/- each under section 186 ipc; rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of rs.1,000/- each under section 332 ipc and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of rs.500/- each under section 353 ipc. feeling aggrieved against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the applicants-appellants filed an appeal malhotra mamta 2014.04.01 11:45 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh criminal misc. no.10138 of 2014 -2- which has been admitted by this court vide order dated 26.03.2014. perusal of the record shows that the applicants- appellants have been granted bail till 06.04.2014 by the trial court. fine has already been paid. the appeal is not likely to mature for hearing in the near future. therefore, in the facts and circumstances, the criminal miscellaneous application is allowed and the sentence of imprisonment of applicants-appellants during the pendency of appeal shall remain suspended and they are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate/duty magistrate, yamuna nagar. march 31, 2014 (inderjit singh) mamta judge malhotra mamta 2014.04.01 11:45 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.

No.10138 of 2014 in Criminal Appeal No.S-1371-SB of 2014 Date of decision: March 31, 2014 Nathi Ram and another ...Applicants-Appellants Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH Present: Mr.Satish Chaudhary, Advocate, for the applicants-appellants.

Mr.Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Prayer in the present application is for suspension of sentence of applicants-appellants Nathi Ram and Amrika during the pendency of appeal.

Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide judgment of conviction dated 05.03.2014 and order of sentence dated 06.03.2014, passed in case FIR No.79 dated 12.04.2013, held the applicants-appellants guilty for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 186, 332 and 353 IPC and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each under Section 186 IPC; rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each under Section 332 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each under Section 353 IPC.

Feeling aggrieved against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the applicants-appellants filed an appeal Malhotra Mamta 2014.04.01 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Criminal Misc.

No.10138 of 2014 -2- which has been admitted by this Court vide order dated 26.03.2014.

Perusal of the record shows that the applicants- appellants have been granted bail till 06.04.2014 by the trial Court.

Fine has already been paid.

The appeal is not likely to mature for hearing in the near future.

Therefore, in the facts and circumstances, the criminal miscellaneous application is allowed and the sentence of imprisonment of applicants-appellants during the pendency of appeal shall remain suspended and they are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar.

March 31, 2014 (INDERJIT SINGH) mamta JUDGE Malhotra Mamta 2014.04.01 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial