Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur university act 2005 section 28 other authorities of the university Page 1 of about 1,841 results (0.152 seconds)

T.M.A. Pai Foundation and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC355; 2003(51)BLJR158; JT2002(9)SC1; 2003(1)KarLJ1; (2002)8SCC481; (2002)3UPLBEC2817

..... up for consideration again before this court in the d.a.v. college case 1971 (supp.) scr 688. some of the provisions of the guru nanak university act established after the reorganization of the state of punjab in 1969 provided for the manner in which the governing body was to be constituted; the body was to ..... (1).109. in state of kerala, etc. v. very rev. mother provincial, etc. 0065/1970 : [1971]1scr734 the challenge was to various provisions of the kerala university act, 1969, whose provisions effected private colleges, particularly those founded by minority communities in the state of kerala. the said provisions, inter alia, sought to provide for the manner in ..... it was open to all sections of the people. the question, therefore, was whether the college could claim the protection of section 48-b of the bihar universities act read with article 30(1) of the constitution, only if it proved that the educational institution was furthering the rights mentioned in article 29(1). section 48-b .....

indore Development Authority Engineers' Association Vs. State of Madhy ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(4)MPLJ45

..... that there can be no doubt whatever that dr. jawatkar continued to be employee of jawaharlal nehru university and his employment could not be transferred by the jawaharlal nehru university to the manipur university without his consent notwithstanding any statutory provision to that effect whether in the manipur university act or elsewhere. the supreme court observed that the contract of service entered into by dr. k.s ..... . jawatkar was a contract with jawaharlal nehru university and no law can convert that contract into a contract between .....

Dr. S.D. Kapoor Vs. the Chancellor, Jai NaraIn Vyas University and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1997Raj217; 1997(1)WLC218; 1996(2)WLN328

..... : (1990 lab ic 1229) where the question before the supreme court was whether before exercising the power under section 31(8)(a) of u.p. state university act. 1973. the chancellor was required toobscrve the principle of natural justice. holding the power of appointment as of administrative nature the court held that the chancellor was not ..... that power of the chancellor to nominate a member of syndicate under clause (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 16 of jai narain vyas university jodhpur act, 1962 thereinafter referred as act no. 17 of 1962) stands exhausted with nomination of the petitioner.3. it is averred in the writ petition that under sub-section (2) ..... passed by the chancellor in the present case in exercise of his subjective satisfaction has been passed for good cause in the interest of the respondent university and he has acted fairly in passing the impugned order. the chancellor has not exercised his power arbitrarily. suffice it to say that principle of natural justice is not .....

Dr Dibyendu Mazumder Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... the dental college, that it is an unaided private college which is at liberty to do whatever it likes, runs counter to the scheme of jharkhand state universities act, 2000. 14. one of the contentions is, that once the vice chancellor made the appointment it became functus officio and had no power to review its ..... have been appointed by negotiation and not upon recommendation of the commission. this practice has been adopted since inception which, even assuming that section 57a of jharkhand universities act, 2000 is attracted in the present case, on account of contrary practice in derogation to provision under section 57a, would render section 57a obsolete. to fortify this ..... by the state government and which was more in the nature of a nomination rather, an appointment, was in the teeth of the statutory provisions under jharkhand universities act, 2000, in particular, sections 57a and 58. petitioner's election as member of dci under section 3(d) has been challenged on the 3 ground that .....

Dr. Anil Kumar Chandna Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2012(8)MLJ534

..... he has not attended any faculty meeting in the year 2010 after he was appointed, as also in the year 2011. 17. under section 13(3) of the annamalai university act, in case of any emergency which, in the opinion of the vice-chancellor, requires that immediate action should be taken, he may take such action and shall immediately ..... to represent as member in the dci for a period upto 31.03.2013. the power was exercised by vice chancellor under section 13(3) of the annamalai university act and the decision was also placed before the senate on 22.10.2011 as per the requirements and it was ratified by the senate. the dci accordingly informed r5 ..... be validly appointed and nominated to hold office of dci. the power exercised by the vice chancellor under section 13(3) of the annamalai university act has been ratified by the competent body of the university and the petitioner cannot question the same. the contention raised by the respondents is well founded. the petitioner has not made out any case .....

Jawaharlal Nehru University Vs. Dr. K.S. Jawatkar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1989SC1577; [1989(59)FLR190]; JT1989(2)SC538; 1989LabIC1526; (1989)IILLJ586SC; 1989(1)SCALE1438; 1989Supp(1)SCC679; [1989]3SCR273; 1989(3)SLJ48(SC); 1989(2)LC463(SC)

..... the center to the manipur university, and the manipur university and the manipur government requested the jawaharlal nehru university for transferring the center accordingly. the jawaharlal nehru university by its resolution dated 3 february, 1981 accepted the proposal and authorised the vice-chancellor to transfer the center to the manipur university the date for transfer was fixed as i april, 1981. meanwhile, the manipur legislature passed the manipur university act, 1984, which was ..... no doubt whatever that he was and continues to be, an employee of the appellant university. there is also no doubt that his employment could not be transferred by the appellant university to the manipur university without his consent notwithstanding any statutory provision to that effect whether in the manipur university act or elsewhere. the contract of service entered into by the respondent was a contract with .....

Nizam Sugars Officers Welfare Association and Others Vs. Government of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD538; 1998(6)ALT507

..... no doubt whatever that he was, and continues to be, an employee of the appellant university. there is also no doubt that his employment could not be transferred by the appellant university to the manipur university without his consent, notwithstanding any statutory provision to that effect whether in the manipur university act or elsewhere. the contract of service entered into by the respondent was contract with the ..... appellant university and no law can convert that contract into a contract between the respondent and the .....

All India Itdc Workers Union and ors. Vs. Itdc and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC301; JT2006(9)SC585; 2006(11)SCALE375; (2006)10SCC66; 2006AIRSCW6102

..... imphal and appointed the respondent as assistant professor on a regular basis and also confirmed him w.e.f. 29.08.1979. in 1981, the university decided to transfer the center to the manipur university. under section 1(4) of the manipur university act, 1980, the governor of manipur made an order which provided for transfer of the members of the faculties of the center to the ..... manipur university. the question was whether the transfer of the center resulted in transfer of the respondent's service to the manipur university. answering in negative and rejecting the jawaharlal .....

M. Thirupathi Reddy and others Vs. Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Oilseed ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD1; 2000(3)ALT460

..... no doubt whatever that he was and continues tobe, an employee of the jawaharlal nehru university. there was also no doubt that his employment could not be transferred by the jawaharlal nehru university to the manipur university without his consent, notwithstanding any statutory provision to that effect whether in the manipur university act or elsewhere. the contract of service entered into by the incumbent was a contract ..... with the jawaharlal nehru university and no law can convert that contract into a contract between the incumbent .....

P. Muthu Pandy S/O. V. Paraman, Executive Chief Grade-i, the Grand Ash ...

Court : Karnataka

..... no doubt whatever that he was and continues to be, an employee of the appellant-university. there is also no doubt that his employment could not be transferred by the appellant-university to the manipur university without his consent notwithstanding any statutory provision to that effect whether in the manipur university act or elsewhere. the contract of service entered into by the respondent was a contract with ..... the appellant-university and no law can convert that contract into a contract between the respondent and .....