Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur university act 2005 section 28 other authorities of the university Page 5 of about 1,841 results (0.988 seconds)

Dr. Neeraj Kumar and Another Vs. V.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... eligible for admissible in ph.d. course in the transferee department considering their basic qualifications. petitioner no.1 filed an application under the right to information act, 2005 seeking information pertaining to the policy for transfer of students in ph.d. course. in response thereto, vide communication dated 3.1.2011, the institute ..... tikoo, incharge, department of pharmacology & toxicology 08. dr. s. d. seth, icmr member c.w.p. no.18789 of 2011 [12]. 09. prof. c. kokate, vice chancellor, kle university, belgaum member 10. prof. h. s. nigah, prof. (mech. engg.) (retd.), p.e.c., chandigarh member 11. prof. bikash medhi, dept. of pharmacology, pgi, chandigarh member ..... k. bhutani, hod, deptt. of natural products member 04. prof. k.p.r. kartha, prof., deptt. of medicinal chemistry member 05. prof. s. s. bari, registrar, panjab university, chandigarh member 06. prof. harmel s. nigah, prof. (mech. engg.) (retd.), p.e.c., chandigarh member 07. prof. b. b. tondon, h. no.3052, sector 19 .....

M/S s.ghosh & Associates vs.delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

..... by the arbitrator in the impugned order. mr sharma, learned counsel for the appellant referred to the decision 8. of the supreme court in mallikarjun v. gulbarga university: (2004) 1 scc372and on the strength of the said decision contended that clause 16 of the agreement must be construed as an arbitration clause since all the necessary ..... by arbitration. arb. a. (comm.) 7/2017 page 6 of 7 in this regard, it is also relevant to refer to section 7(4) of the act 17. which expressly provides that arbitration agreement would be in writing if it is contained in an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunications, which ..... notice. the learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.4. the appellant has filed the present appeal under section 37(2) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter the act ) impugning the order dated 06.02.2017 (incorrectly dated as 06.01.2017) passed by the arbitrator holding that an arbitration agreement does not exist between .....

Ramjee Singh vs.the Union of India Through Its Secretary, Department o ...

Court : Delhi

..... under clause (b) of that sub-section, if he ceases to be a member of the faculty or department (by whatever name called) of indian medicine of the university concerned. (3) a casual vacancy in the central council shall be filled by election or nomination, as the case may be, and the person elected or nominated ..... hold the field for completing such an action. the courts in the process of interpretation can supply the lacuna, which would help to achieve the object of the act and the legislative intent and make the provisions effective and operative.39. neither the government, nor the central council can abjure their obligation to complete the election ..... the reasons afore-recorded, we partially allow this public interest litigation, with the above observations and the following directions:-"(a) section 7 of the indian medicine central council act, 1970 or any part thereof is neither ultra vires nor violative of articles 14 and/or 16 of the constitution of india. (b) we hereby mandate that the .....

The Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC992

..... citizens under article 29(2) which was being enjoyed by all the citizens since very inception of university were sought to be impaired by 1981 amendment act. it is admitted fact that prior to 2005 in the admission policy the aligarh muslim university never prescribed. any quota for muslim candidates and all citizens had right under article 29(2) to ..... do accept. we only note that after 1956 and the passing of the university grants commission act a university can only be set up by the appropriate legislature; on the basis of yashpal's case, which was given to us by dr. dhawan. and paragraph 59 thereof 2005, 5 scc 420, the safest way to go about it. would be ..... g. courses in fact prior to 2005 apart from 25% admission under all india quota 75% seats were filled up by examination conducted by aligarh muslim university. the petitioners have also claimed in the writ petition that section 2(i) and section 5(2)(c) as inserted by aligarh muslim university amendment act 1981 (act no. 62 of 1981) be .....

Manubhai Paragji Vashi Vs. University of Bombay and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1993Bom197; 1993(3)BomCR364; (1993)95BOMLR855; 1993(2)MhLj1197

..... rule of propriety or the norm laid down in the impugned ruling has clear nexus with the provisions contained in section 18(1) of the university act: the chancellor is the head of the university. the chancellor is entitled to issue the necessary ruling in the meeting of the senate or by a letter or in the form of ..... authority to issue the said ruling and the said ruling is not referable to any of the provisions contained in the bombay university act 1974. the said ruling expressly refers to s. 18(1) of the bombay university act 1974 and prescribes a norm of propriety to the effect that appearance by a member of the senate or executive council ..... following ruling on the subject referred to him:-- 'according to the provision of s. 18 of the bombay university act, 1974 it is the duty of every authority and officer of the university to ensure that the interests of the university are duly safeguarded. a member of the senate or executive council has the advantage of looking into certain papers .....

Dr. S.C. Barat and anr. Vs. Hari Vinayak Pataskar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962MP73

..... mishra, as the vice-chancellor and for the issue of suitable directions to the chancellor for the appointment of the vice-chancellor of the university in accordance with section 11 of the jabalpur university act, 1956.2. the material facts are that the term of the respondent no. 3, pt. kunjilal dubey, as the vice-chancellor was ..... that question is final; that the right canvassed by the petitioners is not a common law right but a right created under the university act and, therefore, the remedy as provided in the act is exclusive; and that the petitioners are guilty of delay and laches and are not, therefore entitled to invoke the powers of this ..... in the subject-matter. one of the petitioners here is a member of the executive council and the other of the academic council, the university is a corporate body constituted under the university act and clearly all the members of the court, the executive council, the academic council and even the registered graduates are all equally interested .....

Vidyasagar Vs. Kerala Agricultural University

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2005Ker35; 2004(3)KLT838

..... direction, declaring that the petitioner is entitled to continue as a member of the executive committee of the kerala agricultural university till 17.6.2005 by virtue of section 15(1) of the kerala agricultural university act, (ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, restraining the respondents from ..... terminating the membership of the petitioner from the executive committee before 17.6.2005 otherwise than in accordance with section 15(1) of the kerala agricultural university act, (iii) to issue such other and further reliefs as may be prayed for from time to time. the learned ..... the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, we do not find any merit in this writ appeal.5. section 11 of the kerala agricultural university act is extracted hereunder:11. reconstruction of the general council (1) the general council shall be reconstituted every three years. (2) every member of the .....

N.M. Rajguru Vs. Gujarat University and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1984)1GLR349

..... 14 seats stood stayed this court's order could not have been taken as permitting such election to be held. of course, it could very well be said that the university acted in all good faith believing that it could proceed with the election to 28 seats because only election to the 14 seats have been stayed. the good faith of the ..... 1 and 2. but still we have posed it in this manner only because it was contended by counsel for the respondents that statute 10(3) as well as the university act envisages only a proper commencement of the election for 42 seats and that once it is so commenced it could be continued even for a lesser number of seats. shri ..... the petitioner come to the court earlier.15. now we may pose the questions that arise for decision in this case. they are:(1) under the provisions of the gujarat university act and the statutes made thereunder could the election have been validly held for some only of the 42 seats in the teachers' constituency or should the election have been held .....

Dr. Ishwari Prasad Vs. Registrar, University of Allahabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1955All131

..... question is i think this: does the section impose on the chancellor the duty of deciding the dispute referred to him in accordance with the provisions of the university act and the statutes made thereunder, or has he to consider the matter from the point of view of policy and expediency? the section enacts that the chancellor ..... authority on the chancellor to decide the matter in dispute impose on him either specifically or by necessary implication the duty to act judicially?8. it is therefore necessary to examine the relative provisions of the allahabad university act, 1921. there is however only one section which requires consideration, section 42, which reads thus :'42. if any ..... science until the 13-3-1954, on which date he retired from the service of the university. he was also a member of the academic council of the university and, as such, was under head (vi) of section 17 of the allahabad university act, 1921, an 'ex officio' member of the court, which is the supreme governing body .....

East Punjab University, Solan Vs. Tarlok Nath

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1953P& H3

..... with the fundamental principles of judicial procedure.'but this dictum will not be applicable because by the combined elfect of sections 20, 31 and 33 of the east punjab university act and the regulations made tnereunder, i.e., the regulation 6 of chapter iii of part ii and regulation 13 of part iv the jurisdiction to decide whether a ..... no. 13 in part iv of the regulations.10. it is perhaps convenient at this stage to set out the various provisions of the east punjab university act, 1947, as amended by the act of 1948 and the ordinance of 1949. section 20 prescribes the constitution of the syndicate and its powers. sub-section (1) of this section provides ..... that of the privy council by courts in india.42. a review of all these cases leads to the conclusion that if the regulations under which the university acted were 'intra vires' and the university did act in accordance with those regulation's, then this court has no jurisdiction to interfere with the decision which was arrived at by the .....