Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur university act 2005 section 28 other authorities of the university Court: chennai Page 1 of about 101 results (0.139 seconds)

Oct 12 2012 (HC)

Dr. Anil Kumar Chandna Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2012(8)MLJ534

..... he has not attended any faculty meeting in the year 2010 after he was appointed, as also in the year 2011. 17. under section 13(3) of the annamalai university act, in case of any emergency which, in the opinion of the vice-chancellor, requires that immediate action should be taken, he may take such action and shall immediately ..... to represent as member in the dci for a period upto 31.03.2013. the power was exercised by vice chancellor under section 13(3) of the annamalai university act and the decision was also placed before the senate on 22.10.2011 as per the requirements and it was ratified by the senate. the dci accordingly informed r5 ..... be validly appointed and nominated to hold office of dci. the power exercised by the vice chancellor under section 13(3) of the annamalai university act has been ratified by the competent body of the university and the petitioner cannot question the same. the contention raised by the respondents is well founded. the petitioner has not made out any case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2004 (HC)

Workmen of Ge Power Controls India (Pvt.) Ltd. Rep. by G.E. Employees ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR960]; (2004)3MLJ221

..... centre of post-graduate studies, imphal to employment in the manipur university, it must be construed as a provision enabling such transfer of employment but only on the assumption that the employee ..... contract of service entered into by the respondent was a contract with the appellant university and no law can convert that contract into a contract between the respondent and the manipur university without simultaneously making it, either expressly or by necessary implication, subject to the respondent's consent. when the manipur university act provides for the transfer of the services of the staff working at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

Indian Oxygen Employees Union, Rep. by Its General Secretary and V. Sr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR100]; (2003)IILLJ222Mad

..... centre at imphal must be understood as employees of the jawaharlal nehru university. the respondent assistant professor continues to be an employee of jawaharlal nehru university. his employment could not be transferred by jawaharlal nehru university to the manipur university without his consent notwithstanding any statutory provision to that effect, whether in the manipur university act or elsewhere. the contract of service of the assistant professor was a ..... simultaneously making it, either expressly or by necessary implication, subject to the assistant professor's consent. when the manipur university act provides for the transfer of the services of the staff working at the centre of post-graduate studies, imphal to employment in the manipur university, it must be construed as a provision enabling such transfer of employment but only on the assumption that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1995 (HC)

Spencer Consumer Products and Service Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Indu ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)IILLJ852Mad

..... assumption that the employee concerned is a consenting party to such transfer, notwithstanding the provision in the manipur university act, that the centre at imphal established by jawaharlal nehru university would become a part of manipur university and the order made by the governor providing that the members of the faculty of the post graduate ..... to be in the employment of the original employer.29. in the case of jawaharlal nehru university v. dr. k.s. jawatkan (1989-ii-llj-586)(sc) : : (1989)iillj586sc it was held that when the manipur university act provided for the transfer of the services of the staff working at the centre of postgraduate studies ..... , imphal, to employment in the manipur university, it must be construed as a provision enabling such transfer of employment but only on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2016 (HC)

A. Jaisankar and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary t ...

Court : Chennai

..... r.suresh kumar, learned standing counsel, while replying to the contention of the petitioners that once they were appointed as per the rules framed under the annamalai university act, after the present annamalai university act 20 of 2013 came to be introduced with effect from 25.9.2013, the status of the persons already appointed under the old rules are protected under ..... probation was also declared satisfactorily and his services were confirmed in the said post on 16.2.2008. in the meanwhile, he joined the m.b.a. degree in 2005 and completed the same in 2008. this m.b.a. qualification was also entered in his service register and thereafter he again joined the course in master of social ..... for the which the petitioner submitted an explanation on 17.7.2013 stating that after passing the b.e.degree in 1995, he joined the m.b.a. degree in 2005 and, although he completed the course in 2007, he could not get through in respect of some papers. however, he completed the m.b.a. degree in may, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2003 (HC)

V. Subramanian and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ349

..... of the judgment observed that, 'there is also no doubt that his employment could not be transferred by the appellant university to the manipur university without his consent, notwithstanding any statutory provision to that effect whether in the manipur university act or elsewhere.' and that ' the position in law is clear, that no employee can be transferred, without his consent ..... less favourable than those applicable immediately before the transfer. 30. it is, therefore, not possible to agree with the submission that section 36 of the anna university act is unconstitutional on the sole ground that transfer of the employee is effected by that provision without his consent. moreover, as noticed in the order of remand ..... these persons were serving in the a.c.t. college for periods ranging from two to twelve years prior to the enactment of the anna university act. what has been stated by the registrar in his affidavit is borne out by the service records which were produced before us. 18. we, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1997 (HC)

V. Kasi Rao Vs. the University of Madras and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)1MLJ572

..... mention above.6. the third respondent has filed a counter affidavit disputing various averments made by the petitioner. it is contended that as per the madras university act, it is the syndicate which has the power to fill up the post of deputy librarian and therefore it is entirely up to them to consider ..... was a research guide to several candidates and he was invited as a subject expert in the field of library science from the kerala university, karnataka university, mysore university and manomaniam sundaranar university. even though he was present during the third respondents interview in the selection committee he kept himself aloof and questions were put to by ..... dated 16.8.1996 calling for the post of deputy librarian. the qualifications prescribed for the post of deputy librarian is 8 years experience as an assistant university librarian/college librarian. a.m. phill/ph. d. degree in library science/information science was said to be desirable. the post advertised was reserved for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2012 (HC)

Madras University Teacher's Association rep. by Its General Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

..... not applicable to elect a person to be nominated as a member of the search committee as the said post is not defined as an authority under the madras university act, 1923 and the statutes. thus, there is no illegality in permitting the proxies to vote during the election held to select a syndicate nominee.10. i have ..... petitioner is not entitled to file this writ petition and if the petitioner is having any grievance it can appeal to the chancellor under section 41 of the madras university act, 1923.8. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reiterated the contentions raised in the affidavit and relied on the statutory provisions by contending that if the ..... constituted, which has to recommend a panel of three names to the chancellor for the appointment of vice-chancellor in accordance with section 11(1)(ii) of the madras university act, 1923, as amended subsequently. the present vice-chancellor has taken charge on 13.10.2009 and his term of office was upto 12.10.2012. therefore a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2010 (HC)

A.Abinash. Vs. the Commissioner of Technical Education, and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... additional advocate general drew the attention of this court to section 22(1)(al), 22(1)(aw), 22(1)(ax) of anna university act. as per which, the university shall (i) conduct the university examinations and approve and publish the results (ii) exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as may be conferred or imposed ..... the constitution of the four member committee is of course challenged but not on the ground that syndicate has no authority to do so under the anna university act, but only on the ground that the committee members having been selected from some of the complainants' colleges is biased and only by accepting the plea ..... basis of the contentions raised on the side of the writ petitioners therein, held that under the relevant provision of anna university act, syndicate is the competent authority to decide about the conduct of the university examinations and to approve and publish the results thereof, under section 22(1)(al) which deals with institution of degrees, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2015 (HC)

Madras University Teachers Association (MUTA), (Regd. No. 37/1977), Ch ...

Court : Chennai

..... a subordinate legislation, having got the assent of the parliament, has got the trappings of a central enactment and hence, will have primacy over the madras university act, 1923. considering the academic excellence required, the minimum qualification prescribed for a member of the search committee cannot be diluted. the decision of the honourable ..... the issues involved, it would be appropriate to refer to the relevant provisions governing the case: sections 11(1) and 11(2) of the madras university act, 1923, prescribes the method by which a vice chancellor can be appointed and it is usefully extracted hereunder: section 11: the vice-chancellor-(1)every ..... 21. i submit that presently he is working as a director, faculty of science and humanities at srm university, chennai, since 2005. he played a major role for various achievements by the said srm university including getting accreditation by naac, and he was instrumental in getting various mous signed with national and multinational .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //