Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur university act 2005 section 28 other authorities of the university Court: delhi Page 1 of about 327 results (0.117 seconds)

Shyam Lal College Vs. Vice Chancellor, Delhi University

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ667

..... respondent shri a.k. nigam has submitted as follows:(a) the delhi university act, 1922 gives power to the university to frame statutes and ordinances on being affiliated to the university and on being admitted to the privileges of the university, a college is fully bound by the university act, ordinances, statutes, rules and regulations.(b) the right guaranteed under article ..... 4. the brief facts of this case are as follows:(a) in the year 1922 the delhi university act, 1922(hereinafter referred to as the `act') came into force and in exercise of the power under section 30 of the act the impugned clause 7 of the ordinance was framed.(b) on 29th may, 1964 late shri ..... of clause 7(2) of the ordinance xviii made under the delhi university act, 1922(hereinafter referred to as `the act') in exercise of the powers under section 30 of the said act read with the amendment approved by executive council (e.c.) of the delhi university, respondent no. 1 dated 10th february, 2004 and statute 30(1)( .....

Swami Vivekanand Subharti University vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the governor on september 04, 2008.7. the said section does not make a distinction between the universities. there is no distinction in the said act between private or other universities. the requirement is that it should be a university established by law.8. the stand taken by the respondent union of india that they have not notified ..... of the court, from amongst the members of the dental faculty of the university or in case the university has no dental faculty, from amongst the members of the medical faculty thereof 5. in terms of section 3(d) of the act , from each university, established by law in the states and which grant recognized dental qualification, one ..... that case, there was a distinction made by the statute in university and the deemed university. however, such a distinction is not made by the dentist act, 1948 insofar as the representation to the dental council of india is concerned. in terms of section 3(d), every university established by law in the state and, which grants a .....

M Rajamannar vs.vice Chancellor Ignou and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... filed on behalf of respondent no.2 i.e. ministry of 15. hrd, it is submitted that the ignou being a central university enjoys the full functional autonomy as envisaged under ignou, act, l985. the university takes all its decision including appointments/promotion etc. of its faculty and non-faculty members with the approval of its bom, which is ..... promotion.7. learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondent no.1 knew very well that according to ignou act, 1985 respondent no.2 has no-vital role in day to day functioning of university including recruitments. however, respondent no.1 rejected the case of petitioner on the view of respondent no.2.8. it ..... 2012 was only a view/comment on petitioner promotion w.e.f. 06.03.2005 and stated that it has no role in day to day functions of university and it is respondent no.1 who takes suitable action/decision in appointments in university under the ignou act, 1985. however, vide letter dated 27.05.2016 the respondent no.2 .....

Ramjee Singh vs.the Union of India Through Its Secretary, Department o ...

Court : Delhi

..... under clause (b) of that sub-section, if he ceases to be a member of the faculty or department (by whatever name called) of indian medicine of the university concerned. (3) a casual vacancy in the central council shall be filled by election or nomination, as the case may be, and the person elected or nominated ..... hold the field for completing such an action. the courts in the process of interpretation can supply the lacuna, which would help to achieve the object of the act and the legislative intent and make the provisions effective and operative.39. neither the government, nor the central council can abjure their obligation to complete the election ..... the reasons afore-recorded, we partially allow this public interest litigation, with the above observations and the following directions:-"(a) section 7 of the indian medicine central council act, 1970 or any part thereof is neither ultra vires nor violative of articles 14 and/or 16 of the constitution of india. (b) we hereby mandate that the .....

M/S s.ghosh & Associates vs.delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

..... by the arbitrator in the impugned order. mr sharma, learned counsel for the appellant referred to the decision 8. of the supreme court in mallikarjun v. gulbarga university: (2004) 1 scc372and on the strength of the said decision contended that clause 16 of the agreement must be construed as an arbitration clause since all the necessary ..... by arbitration. arb. a. (comm.) 7/2017 page 6 of 7 in this regard, it is also relevant to refer to section 7(4) of the act 17. which expressly provides that arbitration agreement would be in writing if it is contained in an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunications, which ..... notice. the learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.4. the appellant has filed the present appeal under section 37(2) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereafter the act ) impugning the order dated 06.02.2017 (incorrectly dated as 06.01.2017) passed by the arbitrator holding that an arbitration agreement does not exist between .....

Dr. V.K. Agrawal Vs. University of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

..... additional statutes or amend or repeal the statutes. thus seen, the statutes are of the own making of the executive council of the university and section 41 of the university act empowers the vice-chancellor to decide the question whether a person is eligible under the statutes to be a member of the executive council and ..... of office of its members is not prescribed in the university act but has been left to be prescribed by the statutes. though the statutes of the university are set out in the schedule to the university act (see section 29(1)) but section 29(2) of the university act empowers the executive council to, from time to time, ..... orders of educational authorities should be minimal. the executive council of the university, of which the petitioner seeks membership, vide section 21 of the university act, is the executive body of the university and in such capacity is concerned with the running of the university and just like the courts have abstained from interfering with the running .....

Prakash Chandra Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 116(2005)DLT472; 2005(80)DRJ191; 2006(2)SLJ102(Delhi)

..... are involved, was directory in nature and cannot prevail over statute 16, which has been notified under section 26 of the guru gobind singh indraprastha university act, 1998. the statute 16 is as under:-'each of the selection committees for appointment to the posts of professors, readers, lecturers and other academic ..... posts. coming to the second submission, there is merit in submission of the respondent's counsel that guru gobind singh indraprastha university having been created under the indraprastha vishwa vidhalaya act, 1998 is bound by the statute creating it and its provisions. mr. goel submits that appendix-v, which contains the composition ..... be notified as regulations. the said letter, carried as an attachment, ugc notification on revision of pay scales, minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers in universities & colleges and other measures for the maintenance of standards, 1998. the said notification provided with regard to the selection committees as under:-5.0.0 .....

B.D. Wadhwa and ors. Vs. Hardyal Devgun and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi678

..... delhi administration. (13) we shall now deal with the statutory aspect of the matter. the delhi university was constituted by the delhi university act, 1922 (act no. viii of 1922), hereinafter referred to as 'the act'. sections 28 to 32 of the act provided for the making of statutes, ordinances and regulations and their content. the composition of executive council ..... governing body shall consist of 15 members and the powers and duties of the governing body shall be as laid down in the delhi university act, 1922 and the statutes, ordinances and regulations of the university of delhi us for the time being being in force. (12) further, rule 2 of the rules framed by the two societies ..... agree with the learned single .judge when he says that 'an office held under an ordinance or statute framed under the delhi university act is, thereforee, as 'statutory' as would be an office held under the act itself. the governing body is itself a creation of statute 30(1)(c) (i). in our opinion, the member of .....

Somaya Gupta vs.jawaharlal Nehru University and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... created or any casual vacancy shall be filled by fresh nomination in accordance with the provisions of this section. 7. the executive council of the university has acted in accordance with the aforesaid regulations in constitution of the icc. it is also relevant to note that 22 members of the executive council were ..... of sexual harassment under the act. the petitioner also w.p.(c) 7915/2018 page 1 of 14 ..... at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) act, 2013 (hereafter the act ).2. the petitioner claims that the icc is biased as it was constituted by the executive committee of the jawaharlal nehru university (hereafter the university ) which includes the vice chancellor and rector-i of the university against whom the petitioner has made a complaint .....

Avinash Kumar vs.university of Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... future of the candidates concerned, as evaluation of ll.m. dissertations, is not directed by any guidelines, rules or regulations. if this is the position, the university has necessarily to act with promptitude and frame, forthwith, appropriate regulations, providing for evaluation of dissertations of ll.m. students, pursuing their ll.m. courses under its aegis. else, there ..... the dissertation of ll.m. without having any experience of teaching ll.m course and research experience. 20. to these, the response, in the counter affidavit of the university, is as under : 5. that in furtherance to the aforesaid reason, the... petitioner has also challenged the appointment of respondent no.5 as his examiner for evaluating ..... of mala fides levelled by an aggrieved w.p.(c) 3033/2018 page 6 of 19 party. the court in ajit kumar nag v. indian oil corpn. ltd.[(2005) 7 scc764:2005. scc (l&s) 1020]. observed thus: (scc p. 790, para56) burden is very heavy . 56. it is well settled that the burden of proving .....